Antonio Messina, Guia Margherita Matronola, Maurizio Cecconi
{"title":"脓毒性休克危重患者个体化输液优化及降压治疗","authors":"Antonio Messina, Guia Margherita Matronola, Maurizio Cecconi","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an updated and practical overview of individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation strategies in critically ill patients with septic shock, integrating the most recent evidence and recommendations on fluid responsiveness and fluid stewardship.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging evidence reinforces the importance of dynamic, patient-tailored fluid management strategies over standardized protocols. Trials such as ANDROMEDA, CLASSIC, have highlighted the need for fluid responsiveness assessment, restricted fluid strategies, and early vasopressor use. The concept of fluid stewardship, structured across four phases - resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation - has gained recognition as a rational approach to avoid fluid overload and improve outcomes. Recent ESICM guidelines also stress the use of balanced crystalloids and individualized volume targets.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Septic shock fluid therapy is evolving from a one-size-fits-all model toward individualized, phase-based management. By incorporating hemodynamic monitoring, dynamic reassessment, and structured clinical phases, fluid administration can be better tailored to each patient's evolving condition. This review emphasizes the critical role of personalized approaches in each phase of fluid therapy and highlights how fluid stewardship may enhance recovery and reduce complications associated with fluid overload.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"582-590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation in critically ill patients with septic shock.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Messina, Guia Margherita Matronola, Maurizio Cecconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an updated and practical overview of individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation strategies in critically ill patients with septic shock, integrating the most recent evidence and recommendations on fluid responsiveness and fluid stewardship.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging evidence reinforces the importance of dynamic, patient-tailored fluid management strategies over standardized protocols. Trials such as ANDROMEDA, CLASSIC, have highlighted the need for fluid responsiveness assessment, restricted fluid strategies, and early vasopressor use. The concept of fluid stewardship, structured across four phases - resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation - has gained recognition as a rational approach to avoid fluid overload and improve outcomes. Recent ESICM guidelines also stress the use of balanced crystalloids and individualized volume targets.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Septic shock fluid therapy is evolving from a one-size-fits-all model toward individualized, phase-based management. By incorporating hemodynamic monitoring, dynamic reassessment, and structured clinical phases, fluid administration can be better tailored to each patient's evolving condition. This review emphasizes the critical role of personalized approaches in each phase of fluid therapy and highlights how fluid stewardship may enhance recovery and reduce complications associated with fluid overload.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"582-590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation in critically ill patients with septic shock.
Purpose of review: To provide an updated and practical overview of individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation strategies in critically ill patients with septic shock, integrating the most recent evidence and recommendations on fluid responsiveness and fluid stewardship.
Recent findings: Emerging evidence reinforces the importance of dynamic, patient-tailored fluid management strategies over standardized protocols. Trials such as ANDROMEDA, CLASSIC, have highlighted the need for fluid responsiveness assessment, restricted fluid strategies, and early vasopressor use. The concept of fluid stewardship, structured across four phases - resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation - has gained recognition as a rational approach to avoid fluid overload and improve outcomes. Recent ESICM guidelines also stress the use of balanced crystalloids and individualized volume targets.
Summary: Septic shock fluid therapy is evolving from a one-size-fits-all model toward individualized, phase-based management. By incorporating hemodynamic monitoring, dynamic reassessment, and structured clinical phases, fluid administration can be better tailored to each patient's evolving condition. This review emphasizes the critical role of personalized approaches in each phase of fluid therapy and highlights how fluid stewardship may enhance recovery and reduce complications associated with fluid overload.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.