脓毒性休克危重患者个体化输液优化及降压治疗

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301
Antonio Messina, Guia Margherita Matronola, Maurizio Cecconi
{"title":"脓毒性休克危重患者个体化输液优化及降压治疗","authors":"Antonio Messina, Guia Margherita Matronola, Maurizio Cecconi","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an updated and practical overview of individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation strategies in critically ill patients with septic shock, integrating the most recent evidence and recommendations on fluid responsiveness and fluid stewardship.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging evidence reinforces the importance of dynamic, patient-tailored fluid management strategies over standardized protocols. Trials such as ANDROMEDA, CLASSIC, have highlighted the need for fluid responsiveness assessment, restricted fluid strategies, and early vasopressor use. The concept of fluid stewardship, structured across four phases - resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation - has gained recognition as a rational approach to avoid fluid overload and improve outcomes. Recent ESICM guidelines also stress the use of balanced crystalloids and individualized volume targets.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Septic shock fluid therapy is evolving from a one-size-fits-all model toward individualized, phase-based management. By incorporating hemodynamic monitoring, dynamic reassessment, and structured clinical phases, fluid administration can be better tailored to each patient's evolving condition. This review emphasizes the critical role of personalized approaches in each phase of fluid therapy and highlights how fluid stewardship may enhance recovery and reduce complications associated with fluid overload.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"582-590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation in critically ill patients with septic shock.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Messina, Guia Margherita Matronola, Maurizio Cecconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an updated and practical overview of individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation strategies in critically ill patients with septic shock, integrating the most recent evidence and recommendations on fluid responsiveness and fluid stewardship.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging evidence reinforces the importance of dynamic, patient-tailored fluid management strategies over standardized protocols. Trials such as ANDROMEDA, CLASSIC, have highlighted the need for fluid responsiveness assessment, restricted fluid strategies, and early vasopressor use. The concept of fluid stewardship, structured across four phases - resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation - has gained recognition as a rational approach to avoid fluid overload and improve outcomes. Recent ESICM guidelines also stress the use of balanced crystalloids and individualized volume targets.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Septic shock fluid therapy is evolving from a one-size-fits-all model toward individualized, phase-based management. By incorporating hemodynamic monitoring, dynamic reassessment, and structured clinical phases, fluid administration can be better tailored to each patient's evolving condition. This review emphasizes the critical role of personalized approaches in each phase of fluid therapy and highlights how fluid stewardship may enhance recovery and reduce complications associated with fluid overload.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"582-590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:综合最新的证据和关于液体反应和液体管理的建议,为脓毒性休克危重患者的个体化液体优化和降压策略提供最新的实用概述。最新发现:新出现的证据强化了动态的、为患者量身定制的流体管理策略比标准化方案的重要性。ANDROMEDA、CLASSIC等试验强调了液体反应性评估、限制性液体策略和早期使用血管加压药物的必要性。流体管理的概念分为四个阶段——复苏、优化、稳定和降级——已被公认为避免流体过载和改善结果的合理方法。最近的ESICM指南也强调使用平衡的晶体和个性化的体积目标。总结:脓毒性休克液治疗正在从一种“一刀切”的模式向个性化的、基于阶段的管理发展。通过结合血流动力学监测、动态再评估和结构化的临床阶段,液体给药可以更好地适应每个患者不断变化的病情。这篇综述强调了个性化方法在液体治疗的每个阶段的关键作用,并强调了液体管理如何提高恢复和减少与液体过载相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation in critically ill patients with septic shock.

Purpose of review: To provide an updated and practical overview of individualized fluid optimization and de-escalation strategies in critically ill patients with septic shock, integrating the most recent evidence and recommendations on fluid responsiveness and fluid stewardship.

Recent findings: Emerging evidence reinforces the importance of dynamic, patient-tailored fluid management strategies over standardized protocols. Trials such as ANDROMEDA, CLASSIC, have highlighted the need for fluid responsiveness assessment, restricted fluid strategies, and early vasopressor use. The concept of fluid stewardship, structured across four phases - resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation - has gained recognition as a rational approach to avoid fluid overload and improve outcomes. Recent ESICM guidelines also stress the use of balanced crystalloids and individualized volume targets.

Summary: Septic shock fluid therapy is evolving from a one-size-fits-all model toward individualized, phase-based management. By incorporating hemodynamic monitoring, dynamic reassessment, and structured clinical phases, fluid administration can be better tailored to each patient's evolving condition. This review emphasizes the critical role of personalized approaches in each phase of fluid therapy and highlights how fluid stewardship may enhance recovery and reduce complications associated with fluid overload.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信