德国正畸患者骨骼错牙合的自动分类。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Eva Paddenberg-Schubert, Kareem Midlej, Sebastian Krohn, Erika Kuchler, Nezar Watted, Peter Proff, Fuad A Iraqi
{"title":"德国正畸患者骨骼错牙合的自动分类。","authors":"Eva Paddenberg-Schubert, Kareem Midlej, Sebastian Krohn, Erika Kuchler, Nezar Watted, Peter Proff, Fuad A Iraqi","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06485-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Precisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and deep-learning models for diagnosing their skeletal class based on the gold-standard individualised ANB of Panagiotidis and Witt.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Orthodontic patients treated in Germany contributed to the study population. Pre-treatment cephalometric parameters, sex, and age served as input variables. Machine-learning models performed were linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB), and multi class logistic regression (MCLR). Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1277 German patients presented skeletal class I (48.79%), II (27.56%) and III (23.64%). The best machine-learning model, which considered all input parameters, was RF with 100% accuracy, with Calculated_ANB being the most important (0.429). The model with Calculated_ANB only achieved 100% accuracy (KNN), but ANB alone was inappropriate (71-76% accuracy). The ANN with all parameters and Calculated_ANB achieved 95.31% and 100% validation-accuracy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine- and deep-learning methods can correctly determine an individual's skeletal class. Calculated_ANB was the most important among all input parameters, which, therefore, requires precise determination.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The AI methods introduced may help to establish digital and automated workflows in cephalometric diagnostics, which could contribute to the relief of the orthodontic practitioner.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 8","pages":"396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Paddenberg-Schubert, Kareem Midlej, Sebastian Krohn, Erika Kuchler, Nezar Watted, Peter Proff, Fuad A Iraqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06485-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Precisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and deep-learning models for diagnosing their skeletal class based on the gold-standard individualised ANB of Panagiotidis and Witt.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Orthodontic patients treated in Germany contributed to the study population. Pre-treatment cephalometric parameters, sex, and age served as input variables. Machine-learning models performed were linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB), and multi class logistic regression (MCLR). Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1277 German patients presented skeletal class I (48.79%), II (27.56%) and III (23.64%). The best machine-learning model, which considered all input parameters, was RF with 100% accuracy, with Calculated_ANB being the most important (0.429). The model with Calculated_ANB only achieved 100% accuracy (KNN), but ANB alone was inappropriate (71-76% accuracy). The ANN with all parameters and Calculated_ANB achieved 95.31% and 100% validation-accuracy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine- and deep-learning methods can correctly determine an individual's skeletal class. Calculated_ANB was the most important among all input parameters, which, therefore, requires precise determination.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The AI methods introduced may help to establish digital and automated workflows in cephalometric diagnostics, which could contribute to the relief of the orthodontic practitioner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 8\",\"pages\":\"396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06485-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06485-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准确诊断骨骼分类是正确正畸治疗的必要条件。人工智能(AI)可以提高诊断过程中的效率,并有助于自动化工作流程。到目前为止,还没有人工智能驱动的程序可以区分德国正畸患者的I、II和III类骨骼。这项前瞻性横断面研究旨在开发机器和深度学习模型,用于基于Panagiotidis和Witt的黄金标准个性化ANB来诊断它们的骨骼类别。材料和方法:在德国接受治疗的正畸患者是研究人群的一部分。治疗前头测量参数、性别和年龄作为输入变量。所使用的机器学习模型包括线性判别分析(LDA)、随机森林(RF)、决策树(DT)、k近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、高斯naïve贝叶斯(NB)和多类逻辑回归(MCLR)。在此基础上建立了人工神经网络(ANN)。结果:1277例德国患者分为骨骼I类(48.79%)、II类(27.56%)和III类(23.64%)。考虑所有输入参数的最佳机器学习模型是RF,准确率为100%,其中Calculated_ANB最重要(0.429)。使用Calculated_ANB的模型只能达到100%的准确率(KNN),而单独使用ANB是不合适的(71-76%的准确率)。带有所有参数的人工神经网络和Calculated_ANB的验证准确率分别达到95.31%和100%。结论:机器和深度学习方法可以正确地确定个体的骨骼类别。Calculated_ANB是所有输入参数中最重要的,因此需要精确确定。临床意义:引入的人工智能方法可能有助于建立数字化和自动化的头部测量诊断工作流程,这可能有助于减轻正畸医生的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Objectives: Precisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and deep-learning models for diagnosing their skeletal class based on the gold-standard individualised ANB of Panagiotidis and Witt.

Materials and methods: Orthodontic patients treated in Germany contributed to the study population. Pre-treatment cephalometric parameters, sex, and age served as input variables. Machine-learning models performed were linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB), and multi class logistic regression (MCLR). Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) was conducted.

Results: 1277 German patients presented skeletal class I (48.79%), II (27.56%) and III (23.64%). The best machine-learning model, which considered all input parameters, was RF with 100% accuracy, with Calculated_ANB being the most important (0.429). The model with Calculated_ANB only achieved 100% accuracy (KNN), but ANB alone was inappropriate (71-76% accuracy). The ANN with all parameters and Calculated_ANB achieved 95.31% and 100% validation-accuracy, respectively.

Conclusions: Machine- and deep-learning methods can correctly determine an individual's skeletal class. Calculated_ANB was the most important among all input parameters, which, therefore, requires precise determination.

Clinical relevance: The AI methods introduced may help to establish digital and automated workflows in cephalometric diagnostics, which could contribute to the relief of the orthodontic practitioner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信