基于拭子的男性艾滋病毒感染者肛门癌筛查:不同筛查算法的预测结果。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Kirsten Rozemeijer, Fernando Dias Gonçalves Lima, Esther J Kuyvenhoven, Henry J C de Vries, Renske D M Steenbergen, Jan M Prins, Matthijs L Siegenbeek van Heukelom
{"title":"基于拭子的男性艾滋病毒感染者肛门癌筛查:不同筛查算法的预测结果。","authors":"Kirsten Rozemeijer, Fernando Dias Gonçalves Lima, Esther J Kuyvenhoven, Henry J C de Vries, Renske D M Steenbergen, Jan M Prins, Matthijs L Siegenbeek van Heukelom","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Screening for and treatment of anal cancer precursor lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), can prevent anal cancer. Recent guidelines set by the International Anal Neoplasia Society recommend digital anal rectal examination (DARE) and anal swab-based screening of high-risk individuals by means of high-risk (hr)HPV testing or cytology. We used our biobank containing data of more than 600 high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) screened participants (94% men with HIV) to compare the possible screening algorithms. We selected the 298 screening participants in whom anal swabs were successfully tested for hrHPV and cytology, parallel to HRA screening (DARE followed by complete visual inspection by HRA). We compared outcomes of several strategies (single-test, co-testing, two-step testing) with one or two positive tests required for HRA referral, resulting in 20 possible screening algorithms. We also assessed the sensitivity of DARE to detect anal cancer. We found that the percentage of missed HSIL was lowest with hrHPV testing, either alone (14.2%) or combined with cytology (≥ASCUS threshold: 4.4%; HSIL threshold: 8.8%) (co-testing or two-step testing, with ≥1 positive test required for HRA referral). Using these screening algorithms, 61.0 %, 79.0 %, and 63.7% of the participants were referred for HRA. While in some scenarios a small percentage of cancers was missed, all were detected by DARE. Whatever strategy is chosen, screening outcomes will have to be monitored closely to evaluate the program and make adaptations when necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swab-based anal cancer screening in men living with HIV: Projected outcomes for different screening algorithms.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Rozemeijer, Fernando Dias Gonçalves Lima, Esther J Kuyvenhoven, Henry J C de Vries, Renske D M Steenbergen, Jan M Prins, Matthijs L Siegenbeek van Heukelom\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Screening for and treatment of anal cancer precursor lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), can prevent anal cancer. Recent guidelines set by the International Anal Neoplasia Society recommend digital anal rectal examination (DARE) and anal swab-based screening of high-risk individuals by means of high-risk (hr)HPV testing or cytology. We used our biobank containing data of more than 600 high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) screened participants (94% men with HIV) to compare the possible screening algorithms. We selected the 298 screening participants in whom anal swabs were successfully tested for hrHPV and cytology, parallel to HRA screening (DARE followed by complete visual inspection by HRA). We compared outcomes of several strategies (single-test, co-testing, two-step testing) with one or two positive tests required for HRA referral, resulting in 20 possible screening algorithms. We also assessed the sensitivity of DARE to detect anal cancer. We found that the percentage of missed HSIL was lowest with hrHPV testing, either alone (14.2%) or combined with cytology (≥ASCUS threshold: 4.4%; HSIL threshold: 8.8%) (co-testing or two-step testing, with ≥1 positive test required for HRA referral). Using these screening algorithms, 61.0 %, 79.0 %, and 63.7% of the participants were referred for HRA. While in some scenarios a small percentage of cancers was missed, all were detected by DARE. Whatever strategy is chosen, screening outcomes will have to be monitored closely to evaluate the program and make adaptations when necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

筛查和治疗肛门癌的前驱病变,高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL),可以预防肛门癌。国际肛门肿瘤学会最近制定的指南建议通过高危(hr)HPV检测或细胞学对高危人群进行直肠指检(DARE)和肛门拭子筛查。我们使用包含600多名高分辨率肛门镜检查(HRA)筛查参与者(94%的男性HIV感染者)数据的生物库来比较可能的筛查算法。我们选择了298名筛查参与者,他们的肛门拭子成功地检测了hrHPV和细胞学,与HRA筛查平行(DARE之后由HRA进行完整的目视检查)。我们比较了几种策略(单检测、联合检测、两步检测)与HRA转诊所需的一项或两项阳性检测的结果,得出20种可能的筛查算法。我们还评估了DARE检测肛门癌的敏感性。我们发现hrHPV检测漏诊HSIL的比例最低,无论是单独检测(14.2%)还是联合细胞学检查(≥ASCUS阈值:4.4%;HSIL阈值:8.8%)(联合检测或两步检测,HRA转诊需要≥1例阳性检测)。使用这些筛选算法,61.0%、79.0%和63.7%的参与者被推荐进行HRA。虽然在某些情况下,有一小部分癌症被遗漏,但所有癌症都被DARE检测到。无论选择何种策略,都必须密切监测筛查结果,以评估该计划并在必要时进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Swab-based anal cancer screening in men living with HIV: Projected outcomes for different screening algorithms.

Screening for and treatment of anal cancer precursor lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), can prevent anal cancer. Recent guidelines set by the International Anal Neoplasia Society recommend digital anal rectal examination (DARE) and anal swab-based screening of high-risk individuals by means of high-risk (hr)HPV testing or cytology. We used our biobank containing data of more than 600 high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) screened participants (94% men with HIV) to compare the possible screening algorithms. We selected the 298 screening participants in whom anal swabs were successfully tested for hrHPV and cytology, parallel to HRA screening (DARE followed by complete visual inspection by HRA). We compared outcomes of several strategies (single-test, co-testing, two-step testing) with one or two positive tests required for HRA referral, resulting in 20 possible screening algorithms. We also assessed the sensitivity of DARE to detect anal cancer. We found that the percentage of missed HSIL was lowest with hrHPV testing, either alone (14.2%) or combined with cytology (≥ASCUS threshold: 4.4%; HSIL threshold: 8.8%) (co-testing or two-step testing, with ≥1 positive test required for HRA referral). Using these screening algorithms, 61.0 %, 79.0 %, and 63.7% of the participants were referred for HRA. While in some scenarios a small percentage of cancers was missed, all were detected by DARE. Whatever strategy is chosen, screening outcomes will have to be monitored closely to evaluate the program and make adaptations when necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信