主导土地覆盖变化对全球森林变化轨迹的影响

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Aman Gupta, Maarten B Eppinga, Reinhard Furrer, Maria J Santos
{"title":"主导土地覆盖变化对全球森林变化轨迹的影响","authors":"Aman Gupta, Maarten B Eppinga, Reinhard Furrer, Maria J Santos","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02245-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Land-cover transitions from forest to non-forest land-covers have led to substantial loss and fragmentation of global forests. While average rates of forest change are well studied, less attention has been paid to spatio-temporal trajectories of forest loss and recovery. These trajectories likely differ by land-cover transition types, and may be constrained by the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest land-cover. In this study, we distinguish between abrupt and gradual forest change trajectories, evaluating how they vary across land-cover transitions and how initial non-forest land-cover conditions mediate the amount and rate of forest change. To this end, we use annual global land-cover maps (1992-2020) from the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative. We find that the expansion of croplands and bare lands drive forest loss, while transitions from wetlands, shrublands and grasslands are key contributors to forest gain. Forest loss rates were lower when the non-forest land-cover was initially fragmented, except for settlements and bare land, where fragmentation accelerated loss. Conversely, forest gain was highest in wetlands and shrublands, though increased fragmentation generally reduced the amount and rate of forest gain. Our results show that the amount and rate of forest change are associated with the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest, transition land-cover. This insight may improve our ability to link remotely-sensed land-cover changes to the underlying drivers of global forest change.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Dominant Land-Cover Transitions in Shaping Trajectories of Global Forest Change.\",\"authors\":\"Aman Gupta, Maarten B Eppinga, Reinhard Furrer, Maria J Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-025-02245-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Land-cover transitions from forest to non-forest land-covers have led to substantial loss and fragmentation of global forests. While average rates of forest change are well studied, less attention has been paid to spatio-temporal trajectories of forest loss and recovery. These trajectories likely differ by land-cover transition types, and may be constrained by the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest land-cover. In this study, we distinguish between abrupt and gradual forest change trajectories, evaluating how they vary across land-cover transitions and how initial non-forest land-cover conditions mediate the amount and rate of forest change. To this end, we use annual global land-cover maps (1992-2020) from the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative. We find that the expansion of croplands and bare lands drive forest loss, while transitions from wetlands, shrublands and grasslands are key contributors to forest gain. Forest loss rates were lower when the non-forest land-cover was initially fragmented, except for settlements and bare land, where fragmentation accelerated loss. Conversely, forest gain was highest in wetlands and shrublands, though increased fragmentation generally reduced the amount and rate of forest gain. Our results show that the amount and rate of forest change are associated with the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest, transition land-cover. This insight may improve our ability to link remotely-sensed land-cover changes to the underlying drivers of global forest change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02245-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02245-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地覆盖从森林向非森林土地覆盖的转变导致了全球森林的大量损失和破碎化。虽然对森林变化的平均速率进行了充分的研究,但对森林损失和恢复的时空轨迹的关注较少。这些轨迹可能因土地覆盖过渡类型而异,并可能受到非森林土地覆盖的初始数量和空间安排的限制。在这项研究中,我们区分了突然和渐进的森林变化轨迹,评估了它们如何在土地覆盖转变中变化,以及初始非森林土地覆盖条件如何调节森林变化的数量和速度。为此,我们使用了欧洲空间局气候变化倡议的年度全球土地覆盖地图(1992-2020)。我们发现,农田和裸地的扩张导致了森林的减少,而湿地、灌丛和草原的过渡是森林增加的关键因素。当非森林土地覆盖最初破碎化时,森林损失率较低,但住区和裸地的破碎化加速了损失。相反,湿地和灌丛的森林收益最高,尽管破碎化程度的增加通常会降低森林收益的数量和速率。研究结果表明,森林变化的数量和速率与非森林过渡性土地覆盖的初始数量和空间分布有关。这一见解可能会提高我们将遥感到的土地覆盖变化与全球森林变化的潜在驱动因素联系起来的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Dominant Land-Cover Transitions in Shaping Trajectories of Global Forest Change.

Land-cover transitions from forest to non-forest land-covers have led to substantial loss and fragmentation of global forests. While average rates of forest change are well studied, less attention has been paid to spatio-temporal trajectories of forest loss and recovery. These trajectories likely differ by land-cover transition types, and may be constrained by the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest land-cover. In this study, we distinguish between abrupt and gradual forest change trajectories, evaluating how they vary across land-cover transitions and how initial non-forest land-cover conditions mediate the amount and rate of forest change. To this end, we use annual global land-cover maps (1992-2020) from the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative. We find that the expansion of croplands and bare lands drive forest loss, while transitions from wetlands, shrublands and grasslands are key contributors to forest gain. Forest loss rates were lower when the non-forest land-cover was initially fragmented, except for settlements and bare land, where fragmentation accelerated loss. Conversely, forest gain was highest in wetlands and shrublands, though increased fragmentation generally reduced the amount and rate of forest gain. Our results show that the amount and rate of forest change are associated with the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest, transition land-cover. This insight may improve our ability to link remotely-sensed land-cover changes to the underlying drivers of global forest change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信