Göran Finnveden, George Kamiya, Vlad C. Coroamă, Pernilla Bergmark, Reid Lifset
{"title":"评估数字化对环境的影响:一个特刊","authors":"Göran Finnveden, George Kamiya, Vlad C. Coroamă, Pernilla Bergmark, Reid Lifset","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital technologies have been transforming societies for decades (Lange et al., <span>2023</span>), with published studies on their environmental impacts dating back to the early 2000s (e.g., Berkhout & Hertin, <span>2001</span>; Fichter, <span>2002</span>; Koomey, <span>2000</span>). The public launch of ChatGPT in late 2022 and the subsequent rise of generative AI has sparked widespread interest in the environmental impacts of AI and wider information and communications technology (ICT) sector (Luers et al., <span>2024</span>). For example, half of all assessments of data center energy use over the past decade have been published since January 2024 (Kamiya & Coroamă, <span>2025</span>).</p><p>Digital technologies are used across economies and societies and result in wide-ranging environmental impacts. These impacts are typically classified into three types or “orders”: first order (direct), second order (indirect), and higher order (structural and behavioral) (Berkhout & Hertin, <span>2004</span>; Hilty & Aebischer, <span>2015</span>). Direct impacts describe the (always detrimental) environmental impacts from raw material extraction, production, use, and waste management of ICT devices and equipment. Indirect effects—which can be both detrimental or beneficial—arise from the use and implementation of digital technologies. Higher-order indirect effects can also be both positive and negative, and include changes to production and consumption patterns, various types of rebound effects, as well as learning and induction effects (Börjesson Rivera et al., <span>2014</span>). Assessing each type of effect requires different data and methodologies.</p><p>Digital technologies and their applications are evolving quickly, making it increasingly challenging to conduct robust environmental assessments on their widespread uses and impacts. A major challenge is the lack of data as well as a lack of established methodologies, particularly when assessing indirect effects (Bergmark et al., <span>2020</span>; Bremer et al., <span>2023</span>; Coroama et al., <span>2020</span>; Masanet et al., <span>2024</span>). Digital technologies are deeply integrated and applied across many sectors, raising challenges in defining system boundaries and allocation of environmental impacts to specific technologies or services.</p><p>This special issue invited papers addressing either direct or indirect environmental impacts of specific or aggregated digital technologies as well as the environmental impact of digitalization at the application, network, sectoral, or macro level. The call for papers specifically welcomed studies addressing methodological challenges and advances in the assessment of environmental impact of the digital economy.</p><p>Table 1 provides an overview of the nine articles included in this special issue, which include methodological papers, case studies, a bibliometric analysis, and a book review. The articles consider both direct and indirect effects, and a range of environmental impact types.</p><p>The papers in this special issue make valuable contributions to the growing literature of environmental impacts of ICT. Further developing and advancing this field of research is critical to keep pace with the spread and impact of digitalization. This compilation indicates trends in the literature, but also some gaps.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 4","pages":"1042-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing environmental impacts of digitalization: A special issue\",\"authors\":\"Göran Finnveden, George Kamiya, Vlad C. Coroamă, Pernilla Bergmark, Reid Lifset\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jiec.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Digital technologies have been transforming societies for decades (Lange et al., <span>2023</span>), with published studies on their environmental impacts dating back to the early 2000s (e.g., Berkhout & Hertin, <span>2001</span>; Fichter, <span>2002</span>; Koomey, <span>2000</span>). The public launch of ChatGPT in late 2022 and the subsequent rise of generative AI has sparked widespread interest in the environmental impacts of AI and wider information and communications technology (ICT) sector (Luers et al., <span>2024</span>). For example, half of all assessments of data center energy use over the past decade have been published since January 2024 (Kamiya & Coroamă, <span>2025</span>).</p><p>Digital technologies are used across economies and societies and result in wide-ranging environmental impacts. These impacts are typically classified into three types or “orders”: first order (direct), second order (indirect), and higher order (structural and behavioral) (Berkhout & Hertin, <span>2004</span>; Hilty & Aebischer, <span>2015</span>). Direct impacts describe the (always detrimental) environmental impacts from raw material extraction, production, use, and waste management of ICT devices and equipment. Indirect effects—which can be both detrimental or beneficial—arise from the use and implementation of digital technologies. Higher-order indirect effects can also be both positive and negative, and include changes to production and consumption patterns, various types of rebound effects, as well as learning and induction effects (Börjesson Rivera et al., <span>2014</span>). Assessing each type of effect requires different data and methodologies.</p><p>Digital technologies and their applications are evolving quickly, making it increasingly challenging to conduct robust environmental assessments on their widespread uses and impacts. A major challenge is the lack of data as well as a lack of established methodologies, particularly when assessing indirect effects (Bergmark et al., <span>2020</span>; Bremer et al., <span>2023</span>; Coroama et al., <span>2020</span>; Masanet et al., <span>2024</span>). Digital technologies are deeply integrated and applied across many sectors, raising challenges in defining system boundaries and allocation of environmental impacts to specific technologies or services.</p><p>This special issue invited papers addressing either direct or indirect environmental impacts of specific or aggregated digital technologies as well as the environmental impact of digitalization at the application, network, sectoral, or macro level. The call for papers specifically welcomed studies addressing methodological challenges and advances in the assessment of environmental impact of the digital economy.</p><p>Table 1 provides an overview of the nine articles included in this special issue, which include methodological papers, case studies, a bibliometric analysis, and a book review. The articles consider both direct and indirect effects, and a range of environmental impact types.</p><p>The papers in this special issue make valuable contributions to the growing literature of environmental impacts of ICT. Further developing and advancing this field of research is critical to keep pace with the spread and impact of digitalization. This compilation indicates trends in the literature, but also some gaps.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"1042-1047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70052\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70052\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
几十年来,数字技术一直在改变社会(Lange et al., 2023),有关其环境影响的已发表研究可以追溯到21世纪初(例如,Berkhout &;Hertin, 2001;费希特,2002;库米,2000)。ChatGPT于2022年底公开推出,以及随后生成式人工智能的兴起,引发了人们对人工智能和更广泛的信息和通信技术(ICT)部门的环境影响的广泛兴趣(Luers等人,2024)。例如,在过去十年中,有一半的数据中心能源使用评估是在2024年1月之后发布的。Coroamă,2025)。数字技术被广泛应用于各个经济体和社会,并对环境产生广泛影响。这些影响通常分为三种类型或“顺序”:一级(直接),二级(间接)和高级(结构和行为)(Berkhout &;Hertin, 2004;Hilty,Aebischer, 2015)。直接影响是指ICT设备和设备的原材料提取、生产、使用和废物管理对环境造成的(通常是有害的)影响。数字技术的使用和实施产生了间接影响,可能是有害的,也可能是有益的。高阶间接效应也可以是积极和消极的,包括生产和消费模式的变化,各种类型的反弹效应,以及学习和诱导效应(Börjesson Rivera et al., 2014)。评估每种影响需要不同的数据和方法。数字技术及其应用正在迅速发展,这使得对其广泛使用和影响进行强有力的环境评估变得越来越具有挑战性。一个主要挑战是缺乏数据以及缺乏既定的方法,特别是在评估间接影响时(Bergmark等人,2020;Bremer et al., 2023;Coroama et al., 2020;Masanet et al., 2024)。数字技术被深度集成并应用于许多部门,在定义系统边界和将环境影响分配给特定技术或服务方面提出了挑战。本期特刊邀请论文讨论具体或综合数字技术对环境的直接或间接影响,以及数字化在应用、网络、部门或宏观层面对环境的影响。论文征集特别欢迎在评估数字经济对环境影响的方法挑战和进展方面的研究。表1提供了本期特刊中包含的九篇文章的概述,其中包括方法学论文、案例研究、文献计量分析和书评。文章考虑了直接和间接影响,以及一系列环境影响类型。本期特刊的论文对日益增长的信息通信技术对环境影响的文献作出了宝贵的贡献。进一步发展和推进这一研究领域对于跟上数字化的传播和影响至关重要。这一汇编表明了文献的趋势,但也有一些差距。作者声明无利益冲突。
Assessing environmental impacts of digitalization: A special issue
Digital technologies have been transforming societies for decades (Lange et al., 2023), with published studies on their environmental impacts dating back to the early 2000s (e.g., Berkhout & Hertin, 2001; Fichter, 2002; Koomey, 2000). The public launch of ChatGPT in late 2022 and the subsequent rise of generative AI has sparked widespread interest in the environmental impacts of AI and wider information and communications technology (ICT) sector (Luers et al., 2024). For example, half of all assessments of data center energy use over the past decade have been published since January 2024 (Kamiya & Coroamă, 2025).
Digital technologies are used across economies and societies and result in wide-ranging environmental impacts. These impacts are typically classified into three types or “orders”: first order (direct), second order (indirect), and higher order (structural and behavioral) (Berkhout & Hertin, 2004; Hilty & Aebischer, 2015). Direct impacts describe the (always detrimental) environmental impacts from raw material extraction, production, use, and waste management of ICT devices and equipment. Indirect effects—which can be both detrimental or beneficial—arise from the use and implementation of digital technologies. Higher-order indirect effects can also be both positive and negative, and include changes to production and consumption patterns, various types of rebound effects, as well as learning and induction effects (Börjesson Rivera et al., 2014). Assessing each type of effect requires different data and methodologies.
Digital technologies and their applications are evolving quickly, making it increasingly challenging to conduct robust environmental assessments on their widespread uses and impacts. A major challenge is the lack of data as well as a lack of established methodologies, particularly when assessing indirect effects (Bergmark et al., 2020; Bremer et al., 2023; Coroama et al., 2020; Masanet et al., 2024). Digital technologies are deeply integrated and applied across many sectors, raising challenges in defining system boundaries and allocation of environmental impacts to specific technologies or services.
This special issue invited papers addressing either direct or indirect environmental impacts of specific or aggregated digital technologies as well as the environmental impact of digitalization at the application, network, sectoral, or macro level. The call for papers specifically welcomed studies addressing methodological challenges and advances in the assessment of environmental impact of the digital economy.
Table 1 provides an overview of the nine articles included in this special issue, which include methodological papers, case studies, a bibliometric analysis, and a book review. The articles consider both direct and indirect effects, and a range of environmental impact types.
The papers in this special issue make valuable contributions to the growing literature of environmental impacts of ICT. Further developing and advancing this field of research is critical to keep pace with the spread and impact of digitalization. This compilation indicates trends in the literature, but also some gaps.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics:
material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'')
technological change
dematerialization and decarbonization
life cycle planning, design and assessment
design for the environment
extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'')
eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'')
product-oriented environmental policy
eco-efficiency
Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.