鸟类和节肢动物对除草剂和放牧的反应:入侵植物管理的权衡和时间滞后

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70355
Jaime J. Coon, Scott B. Maresh Nelson, Rachel C. Daughtridge, Diane M. Debinski, Walter H. Schacht, James R. Miller
{"title":"鸟类和节肢动物对除草剂和放牧的反应:入侵植物管理的权衡和时间滞后","authors":"Jaime J. Coon,&nbsp;Scott B. Maresh Nelson,&nbsp;Rachel C. Daughtridge,&nbsp;Diane M. Debinski,&nbsp;Walter H. Schacht,&nbsp;James R. Miller","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing ecologically harmful plant species requires an understanding of the impacts of complex spatial and temporal disturbances on ecological communities. Actions aimed at controlling non-native plants can have dynamic effects on patterns of succession, with lag effects and trade-offs possible. In grasslands, invasive plants can be reduced using intensive grazing during the peak growth of target species or applying herbicide when non-target plants are dormant. It is unclear how combining herbicide with grazing impacts fauna and whether there are lag effects as ecosystem recovery occurs. Using landscape-scale experiments, we studied how these techniques affect multiple trophic levels several years after management disturbance, focusing on grassland birds (2015–2018) and their arthropod prey (2015–2017). Our large study patches (<i>n</i> = 54, mean size = 10 ha) were invaded by tall fescue (<i>Schedonorus arundinaceus</i>), an ecologically harmful non-native grass. We first conducted a large-scale controlled experiment on a subset of 21 patches, which were grouped spatially into threes and treated with (1) herbicide (glyphosate), (2) herbicide and native seeding, or (3) no treatment (control). When examining the entire sample of 54 patches, we were able to explore the interactive effects of herbicide and (1) intensive-early stocking (double-stocking cattle April–June), (2) season-long stocking (moderate stocking April–September), or (3) no grazing. Birds and arthropods were monitored for 3–4 years post-treatment, allowing us to examine temporal shifts after these management disturbances. In our experiment, we found that herbicide-treated patches, in comparison with controls, had an increased abundance of several native bird species and arthropod orders in Year 2 or 3 after treatment, with some negative responses in Year 1. These lag times indicate that applying herbicide over broad areas without providing refugia may have short-term negative consequences, especially for arthropods. When examining the interactive effects of treatments, we found that herbicide in conjunction with grazing resulted in declines for several disturbance-sensitive bird species. Improved understanding of lag effects, trade-offs, and taxon-specific responses to treatment combinations can inform restoration that limits deleterious effects of treatments on native wildlife.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70355","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bird and arthropod response to herbicide and grazing: Trade-offs and time lags in invasive plant management\",\"authors\":\"Jaime J. Coon,&nbsp;Scott B. Maresh Nelson,&nbsp;Rachel C. Daughtridge,&nbsp;Diane M. Debinski,&nbsp;Walter H. Schacht,&nbsp;James R. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Managing ecologically harmful plant species requires an understanding of the impacts of complex spatial and temporal disturbances on ecological communities. Actions aimed at controlling non-native plants can have dynamic effects on patterns of succession, with lag effects and trade-offs possible. In grasslands, invasive plants can be reduced using intensive grazing during the peak growth of target species or applying herbicide when non-target plants are dormant. It is unclear how combining herbicide with grazing impacts fauna and whether there are lag effects as ecosystem recovery occurs. Using landscape-scale experiments, we studied how these techniques affect multiple trophic levels several years after management disturbance, focusing on grassland birds (2015–2018) and their arthropod prey (2015–2017). Our large study patches (<i>n</i> = 54, mean size = 10 ha) were invaded by tall fescue (<i>Schedonorus arundinaceus</i>), an ecologically harmful non-native grass. We first conducted a large-scale controlled experiment on a subset of 21 patches, which were grouped spatially into threes and treated with (1) herbicide (glyphosate), (2) herbicide and native seeding, or (3) no treatment (control). When examining the entire sample of 54 patches, we were able to explore the interactive effects of herbicide and (1) intensive-early stocking (double-stocking cattle April–June), (2) season-long stocking (moderate stocking April–September), or (3) no grazing. Birds and arthropods were monitored for 3–4 years post-treatment, allowing us to examine temporal shifts after these management disturbances. In our experiment, we found that herbicide-treated patches, in comparison with controls, had an increased abundance of several native bird species and arthropod orders in Year 2 or 3 after treatment, with some negative responses in Year 1. These lag times indicate that applying herbicide over broad areas without providing refugia may have short-term negative consequences, especially for arthropods. When examining the interactive effects of treatments, we found that herbicide in conjunction with grazing resulted in declines for several disturbance-sensitive bird species. Improved understanding of lag effects, trade-offs, and taxon-specific responses to treatment combinations can inform restoration that limits deleterious effects of treatments on native wildlife.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70355\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70355\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管理对生态有害的植物物种需要了解复杂的时空干扰对生态群落的影响。旨在控制非本地植物的行动可能对演替模式产生动态影响,并可能产生滞后效应和权衡。在草地上,可以在目标植物生长高峰时采用集约放牧或在非目标植物休眠时施用除草剂来减少入侵植物。目前还不清楚除草剂与放牧结合对动物群的影响,以及在生态系统恢复过程中是否存在滞后效应。通过景观尺度的实验,我们研究了这些技术在管理干扰几年后对多种营养水平的影响,重点是草原鸟类(2015-2018)及其节肢动物猎物(2015-2017)。我们的大型研究斑块(n = 54,平均面积= 10 ha)被高羊茅(Schedonorus arundinaceus)入侵,这是一种生态有害的非本地草。首先,我们在21个斑块上进行了大规模的对照实验,将这些斑块在空间上分为3个,分别使用(1)除草剂(草甘膦)、(2)除草剂和本地播种以及(3)不使用除草剂(对照)。通过对54个样地的调查,我们能够探索除草剂与(1)密集-早期放养(4 - 6月双放养)、(2)季节长放养(4 - 9月中度放养)或(3)不放牧的相互作用效应。治疗后对鸟类和节肢动物进行了3-4年的监测,使我们能够检查这些管理干扰后的时间变化。在我们的实验中,我们发现,与对照相比,除草剂处理后的斑块,在处理后的第2年或第3年,几种本地鸟类和节肢动物的丰度增加,在第1年出现了一些负反应。这些滞后时间表明,在大面积施用除草剂而不提供避难所可能会产生短期的负面影响,特别是对节肢动物。在检查处理的相互作用时,我们发现除草剂与放牧结合导致几种干扰敏感的鸟类数量下降。更好地了解滞后效应、权衡和分类群对处理组合的特异性反应,可以为限制处理对本地野生动物的有害影响的恢复提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bird and arthropod response to herbicide and grazing: Trade-offs and time lags in invasive plant management

Bird and arthropod response to herbicide and grazing: Trade-offs and time lags in invasive plant management

Bird and arthropod response to herbicide and grazing: Trade-offs and time lags in invasive plant management

Bird and arthropod response to herbicide and grazing: Trade-offs and time lags in invasive plant management

Bird and arthropod response to herbicide and grazing: Trade-offs and time lags in invasive plant management

Bird and arthropod response to herbicide and grazing: Trade-offs and time lags in invasive plant management

Managing ecologically harmful plant species requires an understanding of the impacts of complex spatial and temporal disturbances on ecological communities. Actions aimed at controlling non-native plants can have dynamic effects on patterns of succession, with lag effects and trade-offs possible. In grasslands, invasive plants can be reduced using intensive grazing during the peak growth of target species or applying herbicide when non-target plants are dormant. It is unclear how combining herbicide with grazing impacts fauna and whether there are lag effects as ecosystem recovery occurs. Using landscape-scale experiments, we studied how these techniques affect multiple trophic levels several years after management disturbance, focusing on grassland birds (2015–2018) and their arthropod prey (2015–2017). Our large study patches (n = 54, mean size = 10 ha) were invaded by tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), an ecologically harmful non-native grass. We first conducted a large-scale controlled experiment on a subset of 21 patches, which were grouped spatially into threes and treated with (1) herbicide (glyphosate), (2) herbicide and native seeding, or (3) no treatment (control). When examining the entire sample of 54 patches, we were able to explore the interactive effects of herbicide and (1) intensive-early stocking (double-stocking cattle April–June), (2) season-long stocking (moderate stocking April–September), or (3) no grazing. Birds and arthropods were monitored for 3–4 years post-treatment, allowing us to examine temporal shifts after these management disturbances. In our experiment, we found that herbicide-treated patches, in comparison with controls, had an increased abundance of several native bird species and arthropod orders in Year 2 or 3 after treatment, with some negative responses in Year 1. These lag times indicate that applying herbicide over broad areas without providing refugia may have short-term negative consequences, especially for arthropods. When examining the interactive effects of treatments, we found that herbicide in conjunction with grazing resulted in declines for several disturbance-sensitive bird species. Improved understanding of lag effects, trade-offs, and taxon-specific responses to treatment combinations can inform restoration that limits deleterious effects of treatments on native wildlife.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信