“这就像一个十字绣……所有连接在一起,但不是一个很好的模式”:对严重精神疾病患者对身体健康不平等的看法的定性研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tassia Kate Oswald, Stan Papoulias, Julie Williams, Jayati Das-Munshi
{"title":"“这就像一个十字绣……所有连接在一起,但不是一个很好的模式”:对严重精神疾病患者对身体健康不平等的看法的定性研究","authors":"Tassia Kate Oswald,&nbsp;Stan Papoulias,&nbsp;Julie Williams,&nbsp;Jayati Das-Munshi","doi":"10.1111/hex.70367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population and face a range of challenges with their healthcare. This study aimed to explore the interplay of issues across system, service, social and individual levels that impact healthcare experiences and outcomes from the perspective of people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative study was conducted. Fifteen individuals participated through focus groups and interviews (mean age = 55 years; range = 39–74 years). Participants were secondary mental health service users living with comorbid SMI and physical health condition(s) in South East London, the United Kingdom. Data were analysed through a process of inductive thematic analysis with reflexive elements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven themes were generated, demonstrating the interplay of system, service, social and individual-level issues. The first two focused on prevailing issues described by participants, including ‘systemic barriers to effective and equitable social and health care’ and ‘interpersonal stigma exacerbating inequalities’. The third and fourth themes described the consequences of these issues: ‘services turning to medication in response to multiple constraints’ and ‘inequities limiting individual actions’. Themes 5 and 6 centred on creating equitable conditions for people with SMI and physical healthcare needs, including ‘the role of informal and formal social supports’ and ‘patient perspectives on what works in health services’. The seventh cross-cutting theme described the ‘intertwined nature of mental and physical health’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights systemic barriers and interpersonal stigma as sources of inequality for people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. The findings highlight the need for investment in social and healthcare roles, services and systems which can be responsive to compounding risks experienced by these individuals. Both physical and mental health needs, and their interactions, should be considered, along with the cumulative impact of poor socio-economic conditions and stressors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>A service user steering group, comprising five people with lived experience of SMI, was convened to support the study. The group met to inform the development of research questions, topic guides and participant materials, support the interpretation of findings, and provide input on the paper.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70367","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It Is Like a Cross-Stitch … All Joined Together But Not Making a Very Nice Pattern’: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on Physical Health Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness\",\"authors\":\"Tassia Kate Oswald,&nbsp;Stan Papoulias,&nbsp;Julie Williams,&nbsp;Jayati Das-Munshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population and face a range of challenges with their healthcare. This study aimed to explore the interplay of issues across system, service, social and individual levels that impact healthcare experiences and outcomes from the perspective of people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative study was conducted. Fifteen individuals participated through focus groups and interviews (mean age = 55 years; range = 39–74 years). Participants were secondary mental health service users living with comorbid SMI and physical health condition(s) in South East London, the United Kingdom. Data were analysed through a process of inductive thematic analysis with reflexive elements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seven themes were generated, demonstrating the interplay of system, service, social and individual-level issues. The first two focused on prevailing issues described by participants, including ‘systemic barriers to effective and equitable social and health care’ and ‘interpersonal stigma exacerbating inequalities’. The third and fourth themes described the consequences of these issues: ‘services turning to medication in response to multiple constraints’ and ‘inequities limiting individual actions’. Themes 5 and 6 centred on creating equitable conditions for people with SMI and physical healthcare needs, including ‘the role of informal and formal social supports’ and ‘patient perspectives on what works in health services’. The seventh cross-cutting theme described the ‘intertwined nature of mental and physical health’.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights systemic barriers and interpersonal stigma as sources of inequality for people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. The findings highlight the need for investment in social and healthcare roles, services and systems which can be responsive to compounding risks experienced by these individuals. Both physical and mental health needs, and their interactions, should be considered, along with the cumulative impact of poor socio-economic conditions and stressors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>A service user steering group, comprising five people with lived experience of SMI, was convened to support the study. The group met to inform the development of research questions, topic guides and participant materials, support the interpretation of findings, and provide input on the paper.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70367\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70367\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度精神疾病(SMI)患者的身体健康状况比一般人群差,在医疗保健方面面临一系列挑战。本研究旨在探讨系统、服务、社会和个人层面的问题对共病重度精神障碍患者的医疗体验和结果的影响。方法采用定性研究方法。15个人通过焦点小组和访谈参与(平均年龄= 55岁;年龄范围= 39-74岁)。参与者是居住在英国伦敦东南部的二级精神卫生服务使用者,他们同时患有重度精神障碍和身体健康状况。数据是通过一个带有反身元素的归纳主题分析过程来分析的。结果产生了七个主题,展示了制度、服务、社会和个人层面问题的相互作用。前两个侧重于参与者描述的普遍问题,包括“有效和公平的社会和卫生保健的系统性障碍”和“人际耻辱加剧了不平等”。第三和第四个主题描述了这些问题的后果:“服务转向药物以应对多重限制”和“限制个人行动的不公平”。主题5和主题6的重点是为重度精神病人和有身体保健需求的人创造公平的条件,包括“非正式和正式社会支持的作用”和“患者对保健服务有效措施的看法”。第七个跨领域主题描述了“身心健康相互交织的本质”。本研究强调了系统障碍和人际耻辱是伴有重度精神障碍和身体健康需求的人不平等的来源。研究结果强调,需要对社会和医疗保健角色、服务和系统进行投资,以应对这些人所经历的复杂风险。应考虑到身心健康需求及其相互作用,以及不良社会经济条件和压力因素的累积影响。为支持这项研究,召集了一个服务用户指导小组,该小组由5名有重度精神障碍生活经历的人组成。该小组开会的目的是为研究问题、主题指南和参与者材料的发展提供信息,支持对研究结果的解释,并为论文提供意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

‘It Is Like a Cross-Stitch … All Joined Together But Not Making a Very Nice Pattern’: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on Physical Health Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness

‘It Is Like a Cross-Stitch … All Joined Together But Not Making a Very Nice Pattern’: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on Physical Health Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness

Background

People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population and face a range of challenges with their healthcare. This study aimed to explore the interplay of issues across system, service, social and individual levels that impact healthcare experiences and outcomes from the perspective of people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted. Fifteen individuals participated through focus groups and interviews (mean age = 55 years; range = 39–74 years). Participants were secondary mental health service users living with comorbid SMI and physical health condition(s) in South East London, the United Kingdom. Data were analysed through a process of inductive thematic analysis with reflexive elements.

Results

Seven themes were generated, demonstrating the interplay of system, service, social and individual-level issues. The first two focused on prevailing issues described by participants, including ‘systemic barriers to effective and equitable social and health care’ and ‘interpersonal stigma exacerbating inequalities’. The third and fourth themes described the consequences of these issues: ‘services turning to medication in response to multiple constraints’ and ‘inequities limiting individual actions’. Themes 5 and 6 centred on creating equitable conditions for people with SMI and physical healthcare needs, including ‘the role of informal and formal social supports’ and ‘patient perspectives on what works in health services’. The seventh cross-cutting theme described the ‘intertwined nature of mental and physical health’.

Implications

This study highlights systemic barriers and interpersonal stigma as sources of inequality for people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. The findings highlight the need for investment in social and healthcare roles, services and systems which can be responsive to compounding risks experienced by these individuals. Both physical and mental health needs, and their interactions, should be considered, along with the cumulative impact of poor socio-economic conditions and stressors.

Patient or Public Contribution

A service user steering group, comprising five people with lived experience of SMI, was convened to support the study. The group met to inform the development of research questions, topic guides and participant materials, support the interpretation of findings, and provide input on the paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信