Tassia Kate Oswald, Stan Papoulias, Julie Williams, Jayati Das-Munshi
{"title":"“这就像一个十字绣……所有连接在一起,但不是一个很好的模式”:对严重精神疾病患者对身体健康不平等的看法的定性研究","authors":"Tassia Kate Oswald, Stan Papoulias, Julie Williams, Jayati Das-Munshi","doi":"10.1111/hex.70367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population and face a range of challenges with their healthcare. This study aimed to explore the interplay of issues across system, service, social and individual levels that impact healthcare experiences and outcomes from the perspective of people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative study was conducted. Fifteen individuals participated through focus groups and interviews (mean age = 55 years; range = 39–74 years). Participants were secondary mental health service users living with comorbid SMI and physical health condition(s) in South East London, the United Kingdom. Data were analysed through a process of inductive thematic analysis with reflexive elements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven themes were generated, demonstrating the interplay of system, service, social and individual-level issues. The first two focused on prevailing issues described by participants, including ‘systemic barriers to effective and equitable social and health care’ and ‘interpersonal stigma exacerbating inequalities’. The third and fourth themes described the consequences of these issues: ‘services turning to medication in response to multiple constraints’ and ‘inequities limiting individual actions’. Themes 5 and 6 centred on creating equitable conditions for people with SMI and physical healthcare needs, including ‘the role of informal and formal social supports’ and ‘patient perspectives on what works in health services’. The seventh cross-cutting theme described the ‘intertwined nature of mental and physical health’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights systemic barriers and interpersonal stigma as sources of inequality for people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. The findings highlight the need for investment in social and healthcare roles, services and systems which can be responsive to compounding risks experienced by these individuals. Both physical and mental health needs, and their interactions, should be considered, along with the cumulative impact of poor socio-economic conditions and stressors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>A service user steering group, comprising five people with lived experience of SMI, was convened to support the study. The group met to inform the development of research questions, topic guides and participant materials, support the interpretation of findings, and provide input on the paper.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70367","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It Is Like a Cross-Stitch … All Joined Together But Not Making a Very Nice Pattern’: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on Physical Health Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness\",\"authors\":\"Tassia Kate Oswald, Stan Papoulias, Julie Williams, Jayati Das-Munshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population and face a range of challenges with their healthcare. This study aimed to explore the interplay of issues across system, service, social and individual levels that impact healthcare experiences and outcomes from the perspective of people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative study was conducted. Fifteen individuals participated through focus groups and interviews (mean age = 55 years; range = 39–74 years). Participants were secondary mental health service users living with comorbid SMI and physical health condition(s) in South East London, the United Kingdom. Data were analysed through a process of inductive thematic analysis with reflexive elements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seven themes were generated, demonstrating the interplay of system, service, social and individual-level issues. The first two focused on prevailing issues described by participants, including ‘systemic barriers to effective and equitable social and health care’ and ‘interpersonal stigma exacerbating inequalities’. The third and fourth themes described the consequences of these issues: ‘services turning to medication in response to multiple constraints’ and ‘inequities limiting individual actions’. Themes 5 and 6 centred on creating equitable conditions for people with SMI and physical healthcare needs, including ‘the role of informal and formal social supports’ and ‘patient perspectives on what works in health services’. The seventh cross-cutting theme described the ‘intertwined nature of mental and physical health’.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights systemic barriers and interpersonal stigma as sources of inequality for people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. The findings highlight the need for investment in social and healthcare roles, services and systems which can be responsive to compounding risks experienced by these individuals. Both physical and mental health needs, and their interactions, should be considered, along with the cumulative impact of poor socio-economic conditions and stressors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>A service user steering group, comprising five people with lived experience of SMI, was convened to support the study. The group met to inform the development of research questions, topic guides and participant materials, support the interpretation of findings, and provide input on the paper.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70367\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70367\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘It Is Like a Cross-Stitch … All Joined Together But Not Making a Very Nice Pattern’: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on Physical Health Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness
Background
People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population and face a range of challenges with their healthcare. This study aimed to explore the interplay of issues across system, service, social and individual levels that impact healthcare experiences and outcomes from the perspective of people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs.
Methods
A qualitative study was conducted. Fifteen individuals participated through focus groups and interviews (mean age = 55 years; range = 39–74 years). Participants were secondary mental health service users living with comorbid SMI and physical health condition(s) in South East London, the United Kingdom. Data were analysed through a process of inductive thematic analysis with reflexive elements.
Results
Seven themes were generated, demonstrating the interplay of system, service, social and individual-level issues. The first two focused on prevailing issues described by participants, including ‘systemic barriers to effective and equitable social and health care’ and ‘interpersonal stigma exacerbating inequalities’. The third and fourth themes described the consequences of these issues: ‘services turning to medication in response to multiple constraints’ and ‘inequities limiting individual actions’. Themes 5 and 6 centred on creating equitable conditions for people with SMI and physical healthcare needs, including ‘the role of informal and formal social supports’ and ‘patient perspectives on what works in health services’. The seventh cross-cutting theme described the ‘intertwined nature of mental and physical health’.
Implications
This study highlights systemic barriers and interpersonal stigma as sources of inequality for people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. The findings highlight the need for investment in social and healthcare roles, services and systems which can be responsive to compounding risks experienced by these individuals. Both physical and mental health needs, and their interactions, should be considered, along with the cumulative impact of poor socio-economic conditions and stressors.
Patient or Public Contribution
A service user steering group, comprising five people with lived experience of SMI, was convened to support the study. The group met to inform the development of research questions, topic guides and participant materials, support the interpretation of findings, and provide input on the paper.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.