2003-2019年芬兰蔬菜作物农药生态毒性影响特征及减少影响建议

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kati Räsänen , Irene Vänninen , Sirpa Kurppa , Jussi V.K. Kukkonen , Peter Fantke
{"title":"2003-2019年芬兰蔬菜作物农药生态毒性影响特征及减少影响建议","authors":"Kati Räsänen ,&nbsp;Irene Vänninen ,&nbsp;Sirpa Kurppa ,&nbsp;Jussi V.K. Kukkonen ,&nbsp;Peter Fantke","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Information on crop-specific pesticide use and environmental impact over time is currently limited. We used longitudinal data, covering 57 pesticides applied to carrot, potato, swede and fresh pea on more than 100 farms in southwestern Finland in 2003–2019. We combined these data with results from mass balance models to estimate emission fractions and characterization factors combining fate, exposure and effects to derive potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts.</div><div>Impacts varied across crops and pesticides and are dominated by a few substances. Spray frequencies and quantities across pesticides varied over the period considered, differing up to five orders of magnitude across crops. Combined with ecotoxicity potentials, this leads to differences in ecotoxicity impacts per hectare-year of more than seven orders of magnitude, ranging from 0.0005 PAF m<sup>3</sup> d (Potentially Affected Fraction of species, PAF, integrated over exposure volume and time) for carrot to 16,000 PAF m<sup>3</sup> d for potato. The three most ecotoxic pesticides in our study (lambda-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, alpha-cypermethrin) rank among the top 1 % in USEtox, while other pesticides are at least a factor of 10 less ecotoxic, with potencies ranging over six orders of magnitude.</div><div>Following our approach, pesticides can be ranked in terms of their environmental impact and the most hazardous pesticides identified for possible replacement with less harmful alternatives. This can inform pesticide substitution and other impact reduction measures in Finland, highlights that pesticide use alone is insufficient to indicate impacts, and has the potential to be applied to other pesticides, crops and regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"522 ","pages":"Article 146247"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing ecotoxicity impacts of pesticides applied to vegetable crops in Finland during 2003–2019 and recommendations for impact reduction\",\"authors\":\"Kati Räsänen ,&nbsp;Irene Vänninen ,&nbsp;Sirpa Kurppa ,&nbsp;Jussi V.K. Kukkonen ,&nbsp;Peter Fantke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Information on crop-specific pesticide use and environmental impact over time is currently limited. We used longitudinal data, covering 57 pesticides applied to carrot, potato, swede and fresh pea on more than 100 farms in southwestern Finland in 2003–2019. We combined these data with results from mass balance models to estimate emission fractions and characterization factors combining fate, exposure and effects to derive potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts.</div><div>Impacts varied across crops and pesticides and are dominated by a few substances. Spray frequencies and quantities across pesticides varied over the period considered, differing up to five orders of magnitude across crops. Combined with ecotoxicity potentials, this leads to differences in ecotoxicity impacts per hectare-year of more than seven orders of magnitude, ranging from 0.0005 PAF m<sup>3</sup> d (Potentially Affected Fraction of species, PAF, integrated over exposure volume and time) for carrot to 16,000 PAF m<sup>3</sup> d for potato. The three most ecotoxic pesticides in our study (lambda-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, alpha-cypermethrin) rank among the top 1 % in USEtox, while other pesticides are at least a factor of 10 less ecotoxic, with potencies ranging over six orders of magnitude.</div><div>Following our approach, pesticides can be ranked in terms of their environmental impact and the most hazardous pesticides identified for possible replacement with less harmful alternatives. This can inform pesticide substitution and other impact reduction measures in Finland, highlights that pesticide use alone is insufficient to indicate impacts, and has the potential to be applied to other pesticides, crops and regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"522 \",\"pages\":\"Article 146247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625015975\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625015975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于特定作物农药使用和长期环境影响的信息有限。我们使用了纵向数据,涵盖了2003-2019年在芬兰西南部100多个农场对胡萝卜、土豆、瑞典和新鲜豌豆使用的57种农药。我们将这些数据与质量平衡模型的结果相结合,以估计排放分数和结合命运、暴露和影响的表征因子,从而得出潜在的淡水生态毒性影响。影响因作物和农药而异,并由少数几种物质主导。在研究期间,各种农药的喷洒频率和数量各不相同,不同作物之间的差异可达5个数量级。结合生态毒性潜力,这导致每公顷年生态毒性影响的差异超过7个数量级,从胡萝卜的0.0005 PAF m3 d(物种潜在影响分数,PAF,综合暴露量和时间)到马铃薯的16,000 PAF m3 d。在我们的研究中,三种最具生态毒性的农药(高效氯氰菊酯、高效氯氰菊酯、高效氯氰菊酯)在USEtox中排名前1%,而其他农药的生态毒性至少低10倍,效价在6个数量级以上。按照我们的方法,农药可以根据其对环境的影响进行排名,并确定可能用危害较小的替代品替代最危险的农药。这可以为芬兰的农药替代和其他减少影响措施提供信息,突出表明仅使用农药不足以表明影响,并有可能应用于其他农药、作物和地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characterizing ecotoxicity impacts of pesticides applied to vegetable crops in Finland during 2003–2019 and recommendations for impact reduction

Characterizing ecotoxicity impacts of pesticides applied to vegetable crops in Finland during 2003–2019 and recommendations for impact reduction
Information on crop-specific pesticide use and environmental impact over time is currently limited. We used longitudinal data, covering 57 pesticides applied to carrot, potato, swede and fresh pea on more than 100 farms in southwestern Finland in 2003–2019. We combined these data with results from mass balance models to estimate emission fractions and characterization factors combining fate, exposure and effects to derive potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts.
Impacts varied across crops and pesticides and are dominated by a few substances. Spray frequencies and quantities across pesticides varied over the period considered, differing up to five orders of magnitude across crops. Combined with ecotoxicity potentials, this leads to differences in ecotoxicity impacts per hectare-year of more than seven orders of magnitude, ranging from 0.0005 PAF m3 d (Potentially Affected Fraction of species, PAF, integrated over exposure volume and time) for carrot to 16,000 PAF m3 d for potato. The three most ecotoxic pesticides in our study (lambda-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, alpha-cypermethrin) rank among the top 1 % in USEtox, while other pesticides are at least a factor of 10 less ecotoxic, with potencies ranging over six orders of magnitude.
Following our approach, pesticides can be ranked in terms of their environmental impact and the most hazardous pesticides identified for possible replacement with less harmful alternatives. This can inform pesticide substitution and other impact reduction measures in Finland, highlights that pesticide use alone is insufficient to indicate impacts, and has the potential to be applied to other pesticides, crops and regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信