{"title":"从生态和经济贡献的角度探讨城市家庭碳不平等:基于夜间灯光数据的经验证据","authors":"Yiwen Zhao , Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing and optimizing household carbon emissions has become an essential part of climate policy. Integrating a just transition into climate action holds profound significance for achieving sustainable development. In this study, nighttime light data are used to calculate household carbon emissions in 284 Chinese cities from 2000 to 2022. The equality of household carbon emissions is investigated in relation to income levels and ecological carrying capacity, revealing the underlying driving factors. The results indicate that household carbon emissions have been continuously increasing. Approximately 18 % of cities demonstrate a greater economic contribution, whereas 50 % of cities show a greater contribution to the ecological carrying capacity. The Gini coefficient between income levels and household carbon emissions demonstrated equality prior to 2017, whereas the Gini coefficient between the ecological carrying capacity and household carbon emissions indicated inequality. Some cities in the eastern and central regions in China bear the burden of economic contribution inequality, whereas cities in the northeastern and western regions bear the burden of ecological carrying capacity contribution inequality. Population density, economic growth, internet penetration, the industrial structure, and openness exert heterogeneous impacts on the inequality of household carbon emissions. It is recommended that carbon inclusion mechanisms be formulated for different income groups, fine-tuned household carbon emissions regulation and data stratification management be promoted, ecological compensation mechanisms be improved, and regional synergistic governance capacity and information-sharing mechanisms be upgraded. These measures aim to achieve the dual benefits of poverty alleviation and emission reduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 108754"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring urban household carbon inequality in terms of ecological and economic contributions: Empirical evidence based on nighttime light data\",\"authors\":\"Yiwen Zhao , Yi Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Managing and optimizing household carbon emissions has become an essential part of climate policy. Integrating a just transition into climate action holds profound significance for achieving sustainable development. In this study, nighttime light data are used to calculate household carbon emissions in 284 Chinese cities from 2000 to 2022. The equality of household carbon emissions is investigated in relation to income levels and ecological carrying capacity, revealing the underlying driving factors. The results indicate that household carbon emissions have been continuously increasing. Approximately 18 % of cities demonstrate a greater economic contribution, whereas 50 % of cities show a greater contribution to the ecological carrying capacity. The Gini coefficient between income levels and household carbon emissions demonstrated equality prior to 2017, whereas the Gini coefficient between the ecological carrying capacity and household carbon emissions indicated inequality. Some cities in the eastern and central regions in China bear the burden of economic contribution inequality, whereas cities in the northeastern and western regions bear the burden of ecological carrying capacity contribution inequality. Population density, economic growth, internet penetration, the industrial structure, and openness exert heterogeneous impacts on the inequality of household carbon emissions. It is recommended that carbon inclusion mechanisms be formulated for different income groups, fine-tuned household carbon emissions regulation and data stratification management be promoted, ecological compensation mechanisms be improved, and regional synergistic governance capacity and information-sharing mechanisms be upgraded. These measures aim to achieve the dual benefits of poverty alleviation and emission reduction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092500237X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092500237X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring urban household carbon inequality in terms of ecological and economic contributions: Empirical evidence based on nighttime light data
Managing and optimizing household carbon emissions has become an essential part of climate policy. Integrating a just transition into climate action holds profound significance for achieving sustainable development. In this study, nighttime light data are used to calculate household carbon emissions in 284 Chinese cities from 2000 to 2022. The equality of household carbon emissions is investigated in relation to income levels and ecological carrying capacity, revealing the underlying driving factors. The results indicate that household carbon emissions have been continuously increasing. Approximately 18 % of cities demonstrate a greater economic contribution, whereas 50 % of cities show a greater contribution to the ecological carrying capacity. The Gini coefficient between income levels and household carbon emissions demonstrated equality prior to 2017, whereas the Gini coefficient between the ecological carrying capacity and household carbon emissions indicated inequality. Some cities in the eastern and central regions in China bear the burden of economic contribution inequality, whereas cities in the northeastern and western regions bear the burden of ecological carrying capacity contribution inequality. Population density, economic growth, internet penetration, the industrial structure, and openness exert heterogeneous impacts on the inequality of household carbon emissions. It is recommended that carbon inclusion mechanisms be formulated for different income groups, fine-tuned household carbon emissions regulation and data stratification management be promoted, ecological compensation mechanisms be improved, and regional synergistic governance capacity and information-sharing mechanisms be upgraded. These measures aim to achieve the dual benefits of poverty alleviation and emission reduction.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.