Matteo Zambon , Federica Mantica , Mafalda Dias , Jonathan Frazer , Manuel Irimia
{"title":"比较转录组学的进化:生物尺度、系统发育跨度和建模框架","authors":"Matteo Zambon , Federica Mantica , Mafalda Dias , Jonathan Frazer , Manuel Irimia","doi":"10.1016/j.gde.2025.102387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comparative transcriptomic studies are key to understanding how molecular evolution drives phenotypic divergence across the tree of life. Here, we discuss three major directions in which the field of comparative transcriptomics is evolving. The first one is enabled by advances in sequencing technologies. Bulk RNA sequencing emerged two decades ago as a key tool to characterize transcriptomic states, enabling evolutionary comparisons at the tissue and organ levels. However, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics are now driving a shift toward a paradigm centered around cell types. Second, while comparative transcriptomic studies have historically focused on a few key model organisms and on species closely related to humans, recent trends have shifted toward both broader phylogenetic coverage and deeper sampling within clades. In parallel, the growing amount of transcriptomic data, together with the advent of machine learning approaches, are leading to the development of new modeling frameworks. These frameworks range from reconstruction of cell type phylogenies to prediction of RNA coverage from genomic sequence alone and have propelled significant progress in evolutionary biology and its biomedical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50606,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Genetics & Development","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of comparative transcriptomics: biological scales, phylogenetic spans, and modeling frameworks\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Zambon , Federica Mantica , Mafalda Dias , Jonathan Frazer , Manuel Irimia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gde.2025.102387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Comparative transcriptomic studies are key to understanding how molecular evolution drives phenotypic divergence across the tree of life. Here, we discuss three major directions in which the field of comparative transcriptomics is evolving. The first one is enabled by advances in sequencing technologies. Bulk RNA sequencing emerged two decades ago as a key tool to characterize transcriptomic states, enabling evolutionary comparisons at the tissue and organ levels. However, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics are now driving a shift toward a paradigm centered around cell types. Second, while comparative transcriptomic studies have historically focused on a few key model organisms and on species closely related to humans, recent trends have shifted toward both broader phylogenetic coverage and deeper sampling within clades. In parallel, the growing amount of transcriptomic data, together with the advent of machine learning approaches, are leading to the development of new modeling frameworks. These frameworks range from reconstruction of cell type phylogenies to prediction of RNA coverage from genomic sequence alone and have propelled significant progress in evolutionary biology and its biomedical applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Genetics & Development\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Genetics & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959437X25000796\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Genetics & Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959437X25000796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evolution of comparative transcriptomics: biological scales, phylogenetic spans, and modeling frameworks
Comparative transcriptomic studies are key to understanding how molecular evolution drives phenotypic divergence across the tree of life. Here, we discuss three major directions in which the field of comparative transcriptomics is evolving. The first one is enabled by advances in sequencing technologies. Bulk RNA sequencing emerged two decades ago as a key tool to characterize transcriptomic states, enabling evolutionary comparisons at the tissue and organ levels. However, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics are now driving a shift toward a paradigm centered around cell types. Second, while comparative transcriptomic studies have historically focused on a few key model organisms and on species closely related to humans, recent trends have shifted toward both broader phylogenetic coverage and deeper sampling within clades. In parallel, the growing amount of transcriptomic data, together with the advent of machine learning approaches, are leading to the development of new modeling frameworks. These frameworks range from reconstruction of cell type phylogenies to prediction of RNA coverage from genomic sequence alone and have propelled significant progress in evolutionary biology and its biomedical applications.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Genetics and Development aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed.
In Current Opinion in Genetics and Development we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form.
2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.[...]
The subject of Genetics and Development is divided into six themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year:
• Cancer Genomics
• Genome Architecture and Expression
• Molecular and genetic basis of disease
• Developmental mechanisms, patterning and evolution
• Cell reprogramming, regeneration and repair
• Genetics of Human Origin / Evolutionary genetics (alternate years)