Maria Eduarda Pacheco Massocatto , Flávia Soster Fernandes , Ivaldir José Tamagno Junior , Luciane Batistella , Gislane Pinho de Oliveira , José Luiz Francisco Alves , Claiton Zanini Brusamarello , Michele Di Domenico
{"title":"葡萄酒工业木质纤维素残渣共热解的协同效应和动力学:迈向低碳经济的废物转化为生物燃料的例子","authors":"Maria Eduarda Pacheco Massocatto , Flávia Soster Fernandes , Ivaldir José Tamagno Junior , Luciane Batistella , Gislane Pinho de Oliveira , José Luiz Francisco Alves , Claiton Zanini Brusamarello , Michele Di Domenico","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The wine industry generates substantial lignocellulosic waste with potential for biofuel production via co-pyrolysis. This study investigates the co-pyrolysis behavior of winemaking residues, including grape stalks (GS), grape pomace from red winemaking (GPW), and grape pomace from grappa production (GPG), in binary and ternary combinations, with the aim of optimizing energy recovery. The biomasses underwent characterization, including compositional, proximate, ultimate, bulk density, and higher heating value analyses. The pyrolysis of the individual residues and their mixtures was conducted in a thermogravimetric analyzer at 5, 10, 20, and 30 °C min<sup>−1</sup>. The activation energy (<em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>) and the pre-exponential factor (<em>A</em>) were estimated using the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose isoconversional and the Kissinger methods, respectively. Synergistic effects were assessed by comparing theoretical values of solid residue mass (<em>W</em>) and <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>, with experimental values. The average <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> ranged between 190.25 and 233.13 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>, with <em>A</em> between 4.76 × 10<sup>16</sup> and 4.26 × 10<sup>20</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>. The ternary mixture exhibited a positive synergistic effect by reducing <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>, lowering the energy barrier for thermal decomposition, and enhancing the reaction's feasibility. In contrast, binary mixtures exhibited a negative synergy, with higher <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> values than individual residues. Notably, the GS + GPG mixture exhibited a positive synergy in terms of <em>W</em>, <em>T</em><sub><em>max</em></sub>, and decomposition rates. These findings show that co-processing winemaking residues can have both beneficial and adverse effects, depending on the combination. The results highlight the untapped potential of this agro-industrial waste as valuable biofuel feedstocks and offer a simplified, practical approach for industrial use, with sustainable organic residue management aligned with circular economy principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 108257"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic effect and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic residues from the winemaking industry: A waste-to-biofuel conversion example toward a low-carbon economy\",\"authors\":\"Maria Eduarda Pacheco Massocatto , Flávia Soster Fernandes , Ivaldir José Tamagno Junior , Luciane Batistella , Gislane Pinho de Oliveira , José Luiz Francisco Alves , Claiton Zanini Brusamarello , Michele Di Domenico\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The wine industry generates substantial lignocellulosic waste with potential for biofuel production via co-pyrolysis. This study investigates the co-pyrolysis behavior of winemaking residues, including grape stalks (GS), grape pomace from red winemaking (GPW), and grape pomace from grappa production (GPG), in binary and ternary combinations, with the aim of optimizing energy recovery. The biomasses underwent characterization, including compositional, proximate, ultimate, bulk density, and higher heating value analyses. The pyrolysis of the individual residues and their mixtures was conducted in a thermogravimetric analyzer at 5, 10, 20, and 30 °C min<sup>−1</sup>. The activation energy (<em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>) and the pre-exponential factor (<em>A</em>) were estimated using the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose isoconversional and the Kissinger methods, respectively. Synergistic effects were assessed by comparing theoretical values of solid residue mass (<em>W</em>) and <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>, with experimental values. The average <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> ranged between 190.25 and 233.13 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>, with <em>A</em> between 4.76 × 10<sup>16</sup> and 4.26 × 10<sup>20</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>. The ternary mixture exhibited a positive synergistic effect by reducing <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>, lowering the energy barrier for thermal decomposition, and enhancing the reaction's feasibility. In contrast, binary mixtures exhibited a negative synergy, with higher <em>E</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> values than individual residues. Notably, the GS + GPG mixture exhibited a positive synergy in terms of <em>W</em>, <em>T</em><sub><em>max</em></sub>, and decomposition rates. These findings show that co-processing winemaking residues can have both beneficial and adverse effects, depending on the combination. The results highlight the untapped potential of this agro-industrial waste as valuable biofuel feedstocks and offer a simplified, practical approach for industrial use, with sustainable organic residue management aligned with circular economy principles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425006683\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425006683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synergistic effect and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic residues from the winemaking industry: A waste-to-biofuel conversion example toward a low-carbon economy
The wine industry generates substantial lignocellulosic waste with potential for biofuel production via co-pyrolysis. This study investigates the co-pyrolysis behavior of winemaking residues, including grape stalks (GS), grape pomace from red winemaking (GPW), and grape pomace from grappa production (GPG), in binary and ternary combinations, with the aim of optimizing energy recovery. The biomasses underwent characterization, including compositional, proximate, ultimate, bulk density, and higher heating value analyses. The pyrolysis of the individual residues and their mixtures was conducted in a thermogravimetric analyzer at 5, 10, 20, and 30 °C min−1. The activation energy (Ea) and the pre-exponential factor (A) were estimated using the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose isoconversional and the Kissinger methods, respectively. Synergistic effects were assessed by comparing theoretical values of solid residue mass (W) and Ea, with experimental values. The average Ea ranged between 190.25 and 233.13 kJ mol−1, with A between 4.76 × 1016 and 4.26 × 1020 min−1. The ternary mixture exhibited a positive synergistic effect by reducing Ea, lowering the energy barrier for thermal decomposition, and enhancing the reaction's feasibility. In contrast, binary mixtures exhibited a negative synergy, with higher Ea values than individual residues. Notably, the GS + GPG mixture exhibited a positive synergy in terms of W, Tmax, and decomposition rates. These findings show that co-processing winemaking residues can have both beneficial and adverse effects, depending on the combination. The results highlight the untapped potential of this agro-industrial waste as valuable biofuel feedstocks and offer a simplified, practical approach for industrial use, with sustainable organic residue management aligned with circular economy principles.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.