Raphael Bartin M.D. , Nikan Zargarzadeh M.D. , Mohammadamin Parsaei M.D. , Alireza A. Shamshirsaz M.D. , Julien J. Stirnemann M.D. , Stephen P. Emery M.D.
{"title":"I期双胎输血综合征的干预或预期管理","authors":"Raphael Bartin M.D. , Nikan Zargarzadeh M.D. , Mohammadamin Parsaei M.D. , Alireza A. Shamshirsaz M.D. , Julien J. Stirnemann M.D. , Stephen P. Emery M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2025.102645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SFPL) is well established as the first line of therapy for stage II-IV twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). The optimal management of stage I TTTS is less well-defined. While many stage I patients resolve spontaneously or remain stage I with good pregnancy outcomes, a majority progress to higher stages. Risk factors that differentiate those who will remain stable or regress vs. those who will progress are lacking. This has led some centers to offer SFLP to patients with stage I disease either immediately or after a period of close observation. The objective of this manuscript is to review the current evidence on the merits of laser treatment versus expectant management for stage I TTTS. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar using the keywords “stage I,” “twin transfusion,” and “management” was undertaken. The results of this review suggest that expectant management of stable, asymptomatic stage I TTTS is a reasonable first-line treatment, whereas selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation is an appropriate first step in some circumstances. Treatment of stage I TTTS should remain an option in select patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102645"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention or expectant management for stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Raphael Bartin M.D. , Nikan Zargarzadeh M.D. , Mohammadamin Parsaei M.D. , Alireza A. Shamshirsaz M.D. , Julien J. Stirnemann M.D. , Stephen P. Emery M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2025.102645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SFPL) is well established as the first line of therapy for stage II-IV twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). The optimal management of stage I TTTS is less well-defined. While many stage I patients resolve spontaneously or remain stage I with good pregnancy outcomes, a majority progress to higher stages. Risk factors that differentiate those who will remain stable or regress vs. those who will progress are lacking. This has led some centers to offer SFLP to patients with stage I disease either immediately or after a period of close observation. The objective of this manuscript is to review the current evidence on the merits of laser treatment versus expectant management for stage I TTTS. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar using the keywords “stage I,” “twin transfusion,” and “management” was undertaken. The results of this review suggest that expectant management of stable, asymptomatic stage I TTTS is a reasonable first-line treatment, whereas selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation is an appropriate first step in some circumstances. Treatment of stage I TTTS should remain an option in select patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693425000690\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693425000690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intervention or expectant management for stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome
Selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SFPL) is well established as the first line of therapy for stage II-IV twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). The optimal management of stage I TTTS is less well-defined. While many stage I patients resolve spontaneously or remain stage I with good pregnancy outcomes, a majority progress to higher stages. Risk factors that differentiate those who will remain stable or regress vs. those who will progress are lacking. This has led some centers to offer SFLP to patients with stage I disease either immediately or after a period of close observation. The objective of this manuscript is to review the current evidence on the merits of laser treatment versus expectant management for stage I TTTS. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar using the keywords “stage I,” “twin transfusion,” and “management” was undertaken. The results of this review suggest that expectant management of stable, asymptomatic stage I TTTS is a reasonable first-line treatment, whereas selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation is an appropriate first step in some circumstances. Treatment of stage I TTTS should remain an option in select patients.
期刊介绍:
In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology.
All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management.
Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.