农业食品系统的循环经济定义和测量框架的回顾:一个南非葡萄酒的观点

Frederik J. Wolfaardt , Adriano Q.P. Chikande , Anscha J.J. Zietsman , Melané A. Vivier , Annie F.A. Chimphango
{"title":"农业食品系统的循环经济定义和测量框架的回顾:一个南非葡萄酒的观点","authors":"Frederik J. Wolfaardt ,&nbsp;Adriano Q.P. Chikande ,&nbsp;Anscha J.J. Zietsman ,&nbsp;Melané A. Vivier ,&nbsp;Annie F.A. Chimphango","doi":"10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The circular economy (CE) can help agrifood industries, such as the wine industry, address their economic, environmental and social sustainability challenges. However, a relevant CE definition considering the industry and socio-economic context is required to direct the transition. This work reviewed academic literature for trends and developments in CE definitions, highlighting the remaining points of contention: the necessity for considering social sustainability impacts, the required scale and complexity of a CE approach, and the activities that can constitute a CE. Targeting a South African context, CE-related South African policies, guidelines and national initiatives were evaluated to capture the local socio-economic context. Consequently, a relevant CE definition was formulated for the South African agrifood industry, prioritising social sustainability contributions and activities targeting natural system regeneration. Literature related to existing CE measurement frameworks and their applicability to agrifood systems was reviewed, considering the wine industry as an example agrifood system. It highlighted the insufficient consideration of energy efficiencies, circularity of biological components and nutrients, and social sustainability impacts as current shortcomings. Future research should address these gaps to allow for the comprehensive evaluation of circularity in agrifood systems. Additionally, developing a standardised methodology for selecting, scaling, weighting and compositing indicators is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100250,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of circular economy definitions and measurement frameworks for an agrifood system: A South African wine perspective\",\"authors\":\"Frederik J. Wolfaardt ,&nbsp;Adriano Q.P. Chikande ,&nbsp;Anscha J.J. Zietsman ,&nbsp;Melané A. Vivier ,&nbsp;Annie F.A. Chimphango\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The circular economy (CE) can help agrifood industries, such as the wine industry, address their economic, environmental and social sustainability challenges. However, a relevant CE definition considering the industry and socio-economic context is required to direct the transition. This work reviewed academic literature for trends and developments in CE definitions, highlighting the remaining points of contention: the necessity for considering social sustainability impacts, the required scale and complexity of a CE approach, and the activities that can constitute a CE. Targeting a South African context, CE-related South African policies, guidelines and national initiatives were evaluated to capture the local socio-economic context. Consequently, a relevant CE definition was formulated for the South African agrifood industry, prioritising social sustainability contributions and activities targeting natural system regeneration. Literature related to existing CE measurement frameworks and their applicability to agrifood systems was reviewed, considering the wine industry as an example agrifood system. It highlighted the insufficient consideration of energy efficiencies, circularity of biological components and nutrients, and social sustainability impacts as current shortcomings. Future research should address these gaps to allow for the comprehensive evaluation of circularity in agrifood systems. Additionally, developing a standardised methodology for selecting, scaling, weighting and compositing indicators is recommended.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801325000363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801325000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循环经济(CE)可以帮助农业食品行业,如葡萄酒行业,解决其经济、环境和社会可持续性挑战。然而,需要考虑到行业和社会经济背景的相关CE定义来指导过渡。这项工作回顾了学术文献中关于行政长官定义的趋势和发展,突出了剩余的争论点:考虑社会可持续性影响的必要性,行政长官方法所需的规模和复杂性,以及可以构成行政长官的活动。针对南非的情况,评价了与欧洲经委会有关的南非政策、指导方针和国家倡议,以反映当地的社会经济情况。因此,为南非农业食品工业制定了相关的CE定义,优先考虑社会可持续性贡献和针对自然系统再生的活动。回顾了与现有CE测量框架及其对农业食品系统的适用性相关的文献,并将葡萄酒行业作为农业食品系统的一个例子。它强调目前的缺点是没有充分考虑到能源效率、生物成分和营养物质的循环性以及社会可持续性影响。未来的研究应该解决这些差距,以便对农业食品系统的循环性进行全面评估。此外,建议制定一种标准化的方法来选择、标度、加权和合成指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of circular economy definitions and measurement frameworks for an agrifood system: A South African wine perspective
The circular economy (CE) can help agrifood industries, such as the wine industry, address their economic, environmental and social sustainability challenges. However, a relevant CE definition considering the industry and socio-economic context is required to direct the transition. This work reviewed academic literature for trends and developments in CE definitions, highlighting the remaining points of contention: the necessity for considering social sustainability impacts, the required scale and complexity of a CE approach, and the activities that can constitute a CE. Targeting a South African context, CE-related South African policies, guidelines and national initiatives were evaluated to capture the local socio-economic context. Consequently, a relevant CE definition was formulated for the South African agrifood industry, prioritising social sustainability contributions and activities targeting natural system regeneration. Literature related to existing CE measurement frameworks and their applicability to agrifood systems was reviewed, considering the wine industry as an example agrifood system. It highlighted the insufficient consideration of energy efficiencies, circularity of biological components and nutrients, and social sustainability impacts as current shortcomings. Future research should address these gaps to allow for the comprehensive evaluation of circularity in agrifood systems. Additionally, developing a standardised methodology for selecting, scaling, weighting and compositing indicators is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信