{"title":"房屋市场的重新上市、代理转换和销售结果","authors":"Darren K. Hayunga , William Swymer","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2025.102086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Single-family homes do not always sell during their initial listing contract. This study investigates how relisting a home–whether with the same or a different agent–affects transaction prices and marketing durations, using over 670,000 sales from 2000 to 2019, including nearly 45,000 relistings. We find that outcomes are shaped by the housing market phase, off-market gap between listings, and relisting type (expired vs. canceled). Relistings during the Peak phase (May 2005–March 2006) yield positive price effects, while other periods exhibit largely discounts. Short off-market gaps (0–7 days) lead to longer total marketing periods, suggesting market skepticism of superficial resets. In contrast, longer gaps (31–180 days) reduce total marketing durations, consistent with a new buyer pool or home renovations. Representation changes following expirations generate modest price gains, contrasting prior findings. Overall, relisting should not be viewed as a uniform signal of failure but as a strategic action shaped by timing and listing history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 102086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relisting, agent switching, and sale outcomes in the housing market\",\"authors\":\"Darren K. Hayunga , William Swymer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhe.2025.102086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Single-family homes do not always sell during their initial listing contract. This study investigates how relisting a home–whether with the same or a different agent–affects transaction prices and marketing durations, using over 670,000 sales from 2000 to 2019, including nearly 45,000 relistings. We find that outcomes are shaped by the housing market phase, off-market gap between listings, and relisting type (expired vs. canceled). Relistings during the Peak phase (May 2005–March 2006) yield positive price effects, while other periods exhibit largely discounts. Short off-market gaps (0–7 days) lead to longer total marketing periods, suggesting market skepticism of superficial resets. In contrast, longer gaps (31–180 days) reduce total marketing durations, consistent with a new buyer pool or home renovations. Representation changes following expirations generate modest price gains, contrasting prior findings. Overall, relisting should not be viewed as a uniform signal of failure but as a strategic action shaped by timing and listing history.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Housing Economics\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Housing Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137725000452\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137725000452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relisting, agent switching, and sale outcomes in the housing market
Single-family homes do not always sell during their initial listing contract. This study investigates how relisting a home–whether with the same or a different agent–affects transaction prices and marketing durations, using over 670,000 sales from 2000 to 2019, including nearly 45,000 relistings. We find that outcomes are shaped by the housing market phase, off-market gap between listings, and relisting type (expired vs. canceled). Relistings during the Peak phase (May 2005–March 2006) yield positive price effects, while other periods exhibit largely discounts. Short off-market gaps (0–7 days) lead to longer total marketing periods, suggesting market skepticism of superficial resets. In contrast, longer gaps (31–180 days) reduce total marketing durations, consistent with a new buyer pool or home renovations. Representation changes following expirations generate modest price gains, contrasting prior findings. Overall, relisting should not be viewed as a uniform signal of failure but as a strategic action shaped by timing and listing history.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Housing Economics provides a focal point for the publication of economic research related to housing and encourages papers that bring to bear careful analytical technique on important housing-related questions. The journal covers the broad spectrum of topics and approaches that constitute housing economics, including analysis of important public policy issues.