L. Jian , N. Wu , F. Bi , H. Li , M. Zhu , M. Bao , Z. Ai , J. Wang , C. Fang , X. Yu
{"title":"宫颈腺癌患者术后预后风险分层:综合生物标志物的开发和验证","authors":"L. Jian , N. Wu , F. Bi , H. Li , M. Zhu , M. Bao , Z. Ai , J. Wang , C. Fang , X. Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2025.107000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Currently, there is a lack of prognostic assessment tools for cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC). To develop a prognostic tool for patients with CAC after surgery, we innovatively integrated radiomic features from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images, clinicopathologic variables, and DNA methylation data.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively collected the clinical and imaging data of patients with CAC. Pre-, post-, and fusion radiomic models were constructed using a support-vector-machine classifier. Clinical, radiomic features, and DNA methylation data were integrated to develop the combined model. Model performance for the prediction of progression-free survival was evaluated using Harrell' concordance index (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show the survival difference between high- and low-risk groups stratified by the models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 127 CAC patients (training cohort, n=86; validation cohort, n=41) were included. In the validation cohort, the clinical model based on chemoradiotherapy and invasion depth achieved a C-index of 0.811 (95%CI: 0.784–0.838). The pre-contrast, post-contrast, and fusion radiomic models yielded a C-index of 0.745 (95%CI: 0.688–0.802), 0.723 (95%CI: 0.668–0.778), 0.757 (95%CI: 0.708–0.806), respectively. The combined model based on chemoradiotherapy, ZNF582, and post-contrast radiomic features obtained the highest C-index of 0.872 (95%CI: 0.835–0.909). The Kaplan-Meier curves display that the high-risk patients had significantly shorter PFS compared to the low-risk patients (all P<0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combined model can be used as a prognosis stratification tool for patients with CAC, which can facilitate disease monitoring and clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 107000"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognosis risk stratification in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma after surgery: Development and validation of integrated biomarkers\",\"authors\":\"L. Jian , N. Wu , F. Bi , H. Li , M. Zhu , M. Bao , Z. Ai , J. Wang , C. Fang , X. Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crad.2025.107000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Currently, there is a lack of prognostic assessment tools for cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC). To develop a prognostic tool for patients with CAC after surgery, we innovatively integrated radiomic features from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images, clinicopathologic variables, and DNA methylation data.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively collected the clinical and imaging data of patients with CAC. Pre-, post-, and fusion radiomic models were constructed using a support-vector-machine classifier. Clinical, radiomic features, and DNA methylation data were integrated to develop the combined model. Model performance for the prediction of progression-free survival was evaluated using Harrell' concordance index (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show the survival difference between high- and low-risk groups stratified by the models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 127 CAC patients (training cohort, n=86; validation cohort, n=41) were included. In the validation cohort, the clinical model based on chemoradiotherapy and invasion depth achieved a C-index of 0.811 (95%CI: 0.784–0.838). The pre-contrast, post-contrast, and fusion radiomic models yielded a C-index of 0.745 (95%CI: 0.688–0.802), 0.723 (95%CI: 0.668–0.778), 0.757 (95%CI: 0.708–0.806), respectively. The combined model based on chemoradiotherapy, ZNF582, and post-contrast radiomic features obtained the highest C-index of 0.872 (95%CI: 0.835–0.909). The Kaplan-Meier curves display that the high-risk patients had significantly shorter PFS compared to the low-risk patients (all P<0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combined model can be used as a prognosis stratification tool for patients with CAC, which can facilitate disease monitoring and clinical decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926025002053\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926025002053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognosis risk stratification in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma after surgery: Development and validation of integrated biomarkers
Aims
Currently, there is a lack of prognostic assessment tools for cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC). To develop a prognostic tool for patients with CAC after surgery, we innovatively integrated radiomic features from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images, clinicopathologic variables, and DNA methylation data.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively collected the clinical and imaging data of patients with CAC. Pre-, post-, and fusion radiomic models were constructed using a support-vector-machine classifier. Clinical, radiomic features, and DNA methylation data were integrated to develop the combined model. Model performance for the prediction of progression-free survival was evaluated using Harrell' concordance index (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show the survival difference between high- and low-risk groups stratified by the models.
Results
A total of 127 CAC patients (training cohort, n=86; validation cohort, n=41) were included. In the validation cohort, the clinical model based on chemoradiotherapy and invasion depth achieved a C-index of 0.811 (95%CI: 0.784–0.838). The pre-contrast, post-contrast, and fusion radiomic models yielded a C-index of 0.745 (95%CI: 0.688–0.802), 0.723 (95%CI: 0.668–0.778), 0.757 (95%CI: 0.708–0.806), respectively. The combined model based on chemoradiotherapy, ZNF582, and post-contrast radiomic features obtained the highest C-index of 0.872 (95%CI: 0.835–0.909). The Kaplan-Meier curves display that the high-risk patients had significantly shorter PFS compared to the low-risk patients (all P<0.05).
Conclusions
The combined model can be used as a prognosis stratification tool for patients with CAC, which can facilitate disease monitoring and clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including:
• Computed tomography
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Ultrasonography
• Digital radiology
• Interventional radiology
• Radiography
• Nuclear medicine
Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.