急诊创伤麻醉护理和儿童火器和非火器伤害的结果:来自美国地区一级创伤中心的9年经验。

Meera Gangadharan,Andrew M Walters,Pudkrong Aichholz,Maeve Muldowney,Wil Van Cleve,John R Hess,L G Stansbury,M Angele Theard,Monica S Vavilala
{"title":"急诊创伤麻醉护理和儿童火器和非火器伤害的结果:来自美国地区一级创伤中心的9年经验。","authors":"Meera Gangadharan,Andrew M Walters,Pudkrong Aichholz,Maeve Muldowney,Wil Van Cleve,John R Hess,L G Stansbury,M Angele Theard,Monica S Vavilala","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIn the United States, firearm injuries are the leading cause of pediatric injury mortality. There is little information about anesthetic care and perioperative outcomes of children with firearm injuries. This study compares clinical characteristics, anesthesia care, and perioperative survival of pediatric patients with firearm and nonfirearm injuries.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured patients <18 years admitted to a regional level 1 US pediatric trauma center between 2014 and 2022 who received anesthetic care within 2 hours of hospital arrival. Differences in clinical characteristics, anesthesia care including therapeutic intensity (arterial and central venous cannulation, blood product transfusion, vasopressor use, or hemostatic agent use) and outcomes (length of stay, mortality, and disposition) were examined between firearm and nonfirearm injury groups and by age groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nDuring the 9-year study period, pediatric firearm injury hospitalizations tripled, and 25.9% (69/266 trauma admissions) patients received emergency firearm injury anesthesia care. Six (8.8%) patients with firearm injuries were under 10 years. Polytrauma occurred in both firearm (7%) and nonfirearm injury (14%) groups. Compared to nonfirearm injuries, patients with firearm injuries were older (P < .0001), had fewer American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I (P = .03) and had more injuries with injury severity score (ISS) 16-25 (P < .01). Abdominal injury (P < .001) was more common than traumatic brain injury (TBI; P < .0001) across age groups but all children 1 to 4 years had profound (ISS ≥25) TBI. Time to anesthetic care was shorter (P < .001), arterial cannulation was more common (P < .02), estimated blood loss (P < .001) was greater, and massive transfusion (P < .0001) was more common during firearm injury anesthesia care. Etomidate (P = .01), midazolam (P < .01) and tranexamic acid (P < .01) use were more common and crystalloid resuscitation was larger (P < .0001) during firearm injury anesthesia care but varied by age group. Lengths of intensive care unit (P < .01) and hospital (P < .01) stay were longer in the firearm injury group. Intraoperative mortality was 1% and 2%, and mortality after the first anesthetic was 6% vs 10% in firearm and nonfirearm injury groups, respectively. All children 1 to 4 years were discharged to advanced placement.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPediatric trauma patients required high intraoperative therapeutic intensity, which was higher during firearm injury anesthesia care. Postoperative firearm injury mortality was high but less than from nonfirearm injury. Firearm injury patterns, anesthesia care and outcomes varied by age group. Operating room team readiness and provision of timely and high intensity anesthetic care are needed to save lives of injured children.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Trauma Anesthesia Care and Outcomes in Pediatric Firearm and Nonfirearm Injuries: 9-Year Experience From a Regional US Level 1 Trauma Center.\",\"authors\":\"Meera Gangadharan,Andrew M Walters,Pudkrong Aichholz,Maeve Muldowney,Wil Van Cleve,John R Hess,L G Stansbury,M Angele Theard,Monica S Vavilala\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ane.0000000000007652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nIn the United States, firearm injuries are the leading cause of pediatric injury mortality. There is little information about anesthetic care and perioperative outcomes of children with firearm injuries. This study compares clinical characteristics, anesthesia care, and perioperative survival of pediatric patients with firearm and nonfirearm injuries.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured patients <18 years admitted to a regional level 1 US pediatric trauma center between 2014 and 2022 who received anesthetic care within 2 hours of hospital arrival. Differences in clinical characteristics, anesthesia care including therapeutic intensity (arterial and central venous cannulation, blood product transfusion, vasopressor use, or hemostatic agent use) and outcomes (length of stay, mortality, and disposition) were examined between firearm and nonfirearm injury groups and by age groups.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nDuring the 9-year study period, pediatric firearm injury hospitalizations tripled, and 25.9% (69/266 trauma admissions) patients received emergency firearm injury anesthesia care. Six (8.8%) patients with firearm injuries were under 10 years. Polytrauma occurred in both firearm (7%) and nonfirearm injury (14%) groups. Compared to nonfirearm injuries, patients with firearm injuries were older (P < .0001), had fewer American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I (P = .03) and had more injuries with injury severity score (ISS) 16-25 (P < .01). Abdominal injury (P < .001) was more common than traumatic brain injury (TBI; P < .0001) across age groups but all children 1 to 4 years had profound (ISS ≥25) TBI. Time to anesthetic care was shorter (P < .001), arterial cannulation was more common (P < .02), estimated blood loss (P < .001) was greater, and massive transfusion (P < .0001) was more common during firearm injury anesthesia care. Etomidate (P = .01), midazolam (P < .01) and tranexamic acid (P < .01) use were more common and crystalloid resuscitation was larger (P < .0001) during firearm injury anesthesia care but varied by age group. Lengths of intensive care unit (P < .01) and hospital (P < .01) stay were longer in the firearm injury group. Intraoperative mortality was 1% and 2%, and mortality after the first anesthetic was 6% vs 10% in firearm and nonfirearm injury groups, respectively. All children 1 to 4 years were discharged to advanced placement.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nPediatric trauma patients required high intraoperative therapeutic intensity, which was higher during firearm injury anesthesia care. Postoperative firearm injury mortality was high but less than from nonfirearm injury. Firearm injury patterns, anesthesia care and outcomes varied by age group. Operating room team readiness and provision of timely and high intensity anesthetic care are needed to save lives of injured children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,枪支伤害是儿童伤害死亡的主要原因。关于火器伤儿童的麻醉护理和围手术期预后的信息很少。本研究比较了火器伤和非火器伤患儿的临床特征、麻醉护理和围手术期生存率。方法:我们对2014年至2022年间入住美国区域一级儿科创伤中心的18岁以下受伤患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者在到达医院后2小时内接受了麻醉护理。临床特征、麻醉护理(包括治疗强度(动脉和中心静脉插管、血液制品输注、血管加压剂使用或止血剂使用)和结局(住院时间、死亡率和处置)在火器伤组和非火器伤组之间以及按年龄组进行了检查。结果在9年的研究期间,儿童火器伤住院人数增加了两倍,25.9%(69/266)的创伤住院患者接受了火器伤急救麻醉护理。6例(8.8%)火器伤患者年龄在10岁以下。多发创伤发生在火器伤组(7%)和非火器伤组(14%)。与非火器伤患者相比,火器伤患者年龄更大(P < 0.0001),美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状态为I的患者更少(P = 0.03),损伤严重程度评分(ISS) 16-25的患者更多(P < 0.01)。腹部损伤(P < 0.001)较外伤性脑损伤(TBI;P < 0.0001),但所有1至4岁的儿童都有深度(ISS≥25)TBI。火器伤麻醉护理时间较短(P < 0.001),动脉插管更常见(P < 0.02),估计失血量(P < 0.001)更大,大量输血(P < 0.001)更常见。火器伤麻醉护理中使用依托咪酯(P = 0.01)、咪达唑仑(P < 0.01)和氨甲环酸(P < 0.01)较多,晶体复苏较多(P < 0.0001),但各年龄组差异较大。火器伤组重症监护时间(P < 0.01)和住院时间(P < 0.01)均较长。术中死亡率分别为1%和2%,首次麻醉后死亡率分别为6%和10%,分别为火器和非火器损伤组。所有1至4岁的儿童均出院进入进阶安置。结论小儿创伤患者术中对治疗强度要求较高,其中火器伤麻醉护理对治疗强度要求较高。术后火器伤死亡率高,但低于非火器伤。火器伤害模式、麻醉护理和结果因年龄组而异。手术室团队的准备和提供及时和高强度的麻醉护理需要挽救受伤儿童的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Trauma Anesthesia Care and Outcomes in Pediatric Firearm and Nonfirearm Injuries: 9-Year Experience From a Regional US Level 1 Trauma Center.
BACKGROUND In the United States, firearm injuries are the leading cause of pediatric injury mortality. There is little information about anesthetic care and perioperative outcomes of children with firearm injuries. This study compares clinical characteristics, anesthesia care, and perioperative survival of pediatric patients with firearm and nonfirearm injuries. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured patients <18 years admitted to a regional level 1 US pediatric trauma center between 2014 and 2022 who received anesthetic care within 2 hours of hospital arrival. Differences in clinical characteristics, anesthesia care including therapeutic intensity (arterial and central venous cannulation, blood product transfusion, vasopressor use, or hemostatic agent use) and outcomes (length of stay, mortality, and disposition) were examined between firearm and nonfirearm injury groups and by age groups. RESULTS During the 9-year study period, pediatric firearm injury hospitalizations tripled, and 25.9% (69/266 trauma admissions) patients received emergency firearm injury anesthesia care. Six (8.8%) patients with firearm injuries were under 10 years. Polytrauma occurred in both firearm (7%) and nonfirearm injury (14%) groups. Compared to nonfirearm injuries, patients with firearm injuries were older (P < .0001), had fewer American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I (P = .03) and had more injuries with injury severity score (ISS) 16-25 (P < .01). Abdominal injury (P < .001) was more common than traumatic brain injury (TBI; P < .0001) across age groups but all children 1 to 4 years had profound (ISS ≥25) TBI. Time to anesthetic care was shorter (P < .001), arterial cannulation was more common (P < .02), estimated blood loss (P < .001) was greater, and massive transfusion (P < .0001) was more common during firearm injury anesthesia care. Etomidate (P = .01), midazolam (P < .01) and tranexamic acid (P < .01) use were more common and crystalloid resuscitation was larger (P < .0001) during firearm injury anesthesia care but varied by age group. Lengths of intensive care unit (P < .01) and hospital (P < .01) stay were longer in the firearm injury group. Intraoperative mortality was 1% and 2%, and mortality after the first anesthetic was 6% vs 10% in firearm and nonfirearm injury groups, respectively. All children 1 to 4 years were discharged to advanced placement. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric trauma patients required high intraoperative therapeutic intensity, which was higher during firearm injury anesthesia care. Postoperative firearm injury mortality was high but less than from nonfirearm injury. Firearm injury patterns, anesthesia care and outcomes varied by age group. Operating room team readiness and provision of timely and high intensity anesthetic care are needed to save lives of injured children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信