儿科尿石症的代谢评估:一个被忽视的关键成分吗?youu - pu工作组的一项国际调查。

Y Quiroz Madarriaga, M I Dönmez, R J M Lammers, B Bañuelos Marco, N Baydilli, E Bindi, S Sforza, I Selvi, L A Hoen
{"title":"儿科尿石症的代谢评估:一个被忽视的关键成分吗?youu - pu工作组的一项国际调查。","authors":"Y Quiroz Madarriaga, M I Dönmez, R J M Lammers, B Bañuelos Marco, N Baydilli, E Bindi, S Sforza, I Selvi, L A Hoen","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paediatric urolithiasis is increasing globally, with metabolic abnormalities as a key contributing factor. However, standardized protocols for metabolic evaluation in children are lacking. This study assessed current practices and knowledge among paediatric urologists worldwide. An international survey was distributed in Spanish and English, gathering data on clinician demographics and metabolic evaluation strategies. A total of 194 clinicians from 49 countries responded. Only 11% routinely performed metabolic evaluations, and while 78% requested stone analysis, just 46% ordered 24-h urine studies. In 84% of cases, paediatric nephrologists were responsible for evaluations, with urologists involved in fewer than 25%. Knowledge of spot urine indices varied, and only 55% recognized crystalluria as a lithogenic risk factor. Fewer than one-third felt confident interpreting metabolic results or initiating treatment. These findings highlight inconsistent practices and limited involvement of paediatric urologists, underscoring the need for clearer guidelines and targeted education to enhance metabolic assessment in stone disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":" ","pages":"501832"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic evaluation in paediatric urolithiasis: Is a key component being overlooked? An international survey by the YAU-PU Working Group.\",\"authors\":\"Y Quiroz Madarriaga, M I Dönmez, R J M Lammers, B Bañuelos Marco, N Baydilli, E Bindi, S Sforza, I Selvi, L A Hoen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Paediatric urolithiasis is increasing globally, with metabolic abnormalities as a key contributing factor. However, standardized protocols for metabolic evaluation in children are lacking. This study assessed current practices and knowledge among paediatric urologists worldwide. An international survey was distributed in Spanish and English, gathering data on clinician demographics and metabolic evaluation strategies. A total of 194 clinicians from 49 countries responded. Only 11% routinely performed metabolic evaluations, and while 78% requested stone analysis, just 46% ordered 24-h urine studies. In 84% of cases, paediatric nephrologists were responsible for evaluations, with urologists involved in fewer than 25%. Knowledge of spot urine indices varied, and only 55% recognized crystalluria as a lithogenic risk factor. Fewer than one-third felt confident interpreting metabolic results or initiating treatment. These findings highlight inconsistent practices and limited involvement of paediatric urologists, underscoring the need for clearer guidelines and targeted education to enhance metabolic assessment in stone disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"501832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童尿石症正在全球范围内增加,代谢异常是一个关键因素。然而,缺乏儿童代谢评估的标准化方案。本研究评估了目前世界范围内儿科泌尿科医生的实践和知识。以西班牙语和英语分发了一项国际调查,收集了有关临床人口统计学和代谢评估策略的数据。来自49个国家的194名临床医生做出了回应。只有11%的人进行常规代谢评估,78%的人要求进行结石分析,只有46%的人要求进行24小时尿液检查。在84%的病例中,儿科肾病专家负责评估,泌尿科医生参与的比例不到25%。对斑点尿指数的了解各不相同,只有55%的人认为结晶尿是一个产石的危险因素。不到三分之一的人有信心解释代谢结果或开始治疗。这些发现强调了不一致的实践和儿科泌尿科医生的有限参与,强调需要更明确的指南和有针对性的教育来加强对结石疾病的代谢评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metabolic evaluation in paediatric urolithiasis: Is a key component being overlooked? An international survey by the YAU-PU Working Group.

Paediatric urolithiasis is increasing globally, with metabolic abnormalities as a key contributing factor. However, standardized protocols for metabolic evaluation in children are lacking. This study assessed current practices and knowledge among paediatric urologists worldwide. An international survey was distributed in Spanish and English, gathering data on clinician demographics and metabolic evaluation strategies. A total of 194 clinicians from 49 countries responded. Only 11% routinely performed metabolic evaluations, and while 78% requested stone analysis, just 46% ordered 24-h urine studies. In 84% of cases, paediatric nephrologists were responsible for evaluations, with urologists involved in fewer than 25%. Knowledge of spot urine indices varied, and only 55% recognized crystalluria as a lithogenic risk factor. Fewer than one-third felt confident interpreting metabolic results or initiating treatment. These findings highlight inconsistent practices and limited involvement of paediatric urologists, underscoring the need for clearer guidelines and targeted education to enhance metabolic assessment in stone disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信