Christopher Atkin, Christina J Howard, Thom Baguley, Joshua Baker, Duncan Guest
{"title":"短期内想象能力与视觉记忆的关系。","authors":"Christopher Atkin, Christina J Howard, Thom Baguley, Joshua Baker, Duncan Guest","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual imagery and short-term memory utilize similar brain networks, but the extent to which they are related remains unclear. Here we explore whether the capacity of visual imagery (as yet unknown) is similar to the known capacity limits of visual working memory (VWM) and visual short-term memory (VSTM). Experiment 1 explored capacity limits in imagination, VWM, and VSTM using a novel paradigm that, for the first time, provided estimates of capacity across these tasks. Imagination capacity was lower than that of VWM and VSTM. Experiments 2-4 eliminated alternative explanations of this capacity difference. Manipulating the time available to generate, update, and maintain an image (imagination task) or encode, update, and maintain an image (VWM task) did not influence performance in either task (Experiment 2). Manipulating the cue location and the size of the cued area had no specific influence on the imagination task (Experiment 3). Changing the test display (Experiment 4) showed that presenting all items at test (configural information) benefited VSTM performance, presenting a single item benefited VWM performance, and manipulating test display had no impact on imagination performance. In Experiment 5, increasing object complexity eliminated the difference between VSTM and imagination capacity; however, VWM capacity remained higher than that of imagery. For the first time, these experiments using analogous tasks demonstrate a difference in the observed capacities of VWM and imagery and provide the first measurable indication of the extent to which top-down (imagery), versus bottom-up activation of sensory systems (memory) supports the representation of perceptual stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relation between the capacities of imagination and visual memory in the short term.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Atkin, Christina J Howard, Thom Baguley, Joshua Baker, Duncan Guest\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visual imagery and short-term memory utilize similar brain networks, but the extent to which they are related remains unclear. Here we explore whether the capacity of visual imagery (as yet unknown) is similar to the known capacity limits of visual working memory (VWM) and visual short-term memory (VSTM). Experiment 1 explored capacity limits in imagination, VWM, and VSTM using a novel paradigm that, for the first time, provided estimates of capacity across these tasks. Imagination capacity was lower than that of VWM and VSTM. Experiments 2-4 eliminated alternative explanations of this capacity difference. Manipulating the time available to generate, update, and maintain an image (imagination task) or encode, update, and maintain an image (VWM task) did not influence performance in either task (Experiment 2). Manipulating the cue location and the size of the cued area had no specific influence on the imagination task (Experiment 3). Changing the test display (Experiment 4) showed that presenting all items at test (configural information) benefited VSTM performance, presenting a single item benefited VWM performance, and manipulating test display had no impact on imagination performance. In Experiment 5, increasing object complexity eliminated the difference between VSTM and imagination capacity; however, VWM capacity remained higher than that of imagery. For the first time, these experiments using analogous tasks demonstrate a difference in the observed capacities of VWM and imagery and provide the first measurable indication of the extent to which top-down (imagery), versus bottom-up activation of sensory systems (memory) supports the representation of perceptual stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001364\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
视觉意象和短期记忆利用类似的大脑网络,但它们之间的关联程度尚不清楚。在这里,我们探讨视觉意象的容量(尚不清楚)是否与视觉工作记忆(VWM)和视觉短期记忆(VSTM)的已知容量限制相似。实验1探索了想象力、VWM和VSTM的能力限制,使用了一种新的范式,首次提供了跨这些任务的能力估计。想象能力低于VWM和VSTM。实验2-4排除了对这种能力差异的其他解释。操纵可用于生成、更新和维护图像(想象任务)或编码、更新和维护图像(VWM任务)的时间对这两个任务的性能都没有影响(实验2)。提示的位置和提示区域的大小对想象任务没有特定的影响(实验3)。改变测试显示(实验4)表明,在测试中呈现所有项目(配置信息)有利于VSTM性能,呈现单个项目有利于VWM性能,而操纵测试显示对想象性能没有影响。在实验5中,物体复杂度的增加消除了视阈与想象能力的差异;然而,VWM的能力仍然高于图像。这些使用类似任务的实验首次证明了观察到的VWM和意象能力的差异,并首次提供了自上而下(意象)与自下而上的感觉系统(记忆)激活在多大程度上支持感知刺激的表征的可测量指示。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
The relation between the capacities of imagination and visual memory in the short term.
Visual imagery and short-term memory utilize similar brain networks, but the extent to which they are related remains unclear. Here we explore whether the capacity of visual imagery (as yet unknown) is similar to the known capacity limits of visual working memory (VWM) and visual short-term memory (VSTM). Experiment 1 explored capacity limits in imagination, VWM, and VSTM using a novel paradigm that, for the first time, provided estimates of capacity across these tasks. Imagination capacity was lower than that of VWM and VSTM. Experiments 2-4 eliminated alternative explanations of this capacity difference. Manipulating the time available to generate, update, and maintain an image (imagination task) or encode, update, and maintain an image (VWM task) did not influence performance in either task (Experiment 2). Manipulating the cue location and the size of the cued area had no specific influence on the imagination task (Experiment 3). Changing the test display (Experiment 4) showed that presenting all items at test (configural information) benefited VSTM performance, presenting a single item benefited VWM performance, and manipulating test display had no impact on imagination performance. In Experiment 5, increasing object complexity eliminated the difference between VSTM and imagination capacity; however, VWM capacity remained higher than that of imagery. For the first time, these experiments using analogous tasks demonstrate a difference in the observed capacities of VWM and imagery and provide the first measurable indication of the extent to which top-down (imagery), versus bottom-up activation of sensory systems (memory) supports the representation of perceptual stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.