髌骨痛跑步者的再训练技术和神经肌肉锻炼:范围回顾。

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.141861
Miguel Farraj, Thomas Guilhem, Joachim Van Cant, Alexandre Rambaud
{"title":"髌骨痛跑步者的再训练技术和神经肌肉锻炼:范围回顾。","authors":"Miguel Farraj, Thomas Guilhem, Joachim Van Cant, Alexandre Rambaud","doi":"10.26603/001c.141861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review examined the use of RRT and NME, either combined or standalone, in runners with PFP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases searched included MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. The scoping review followed the PRISMA-SCR framework, using population, concept, and context criteria. The population included recreational to professional runners over 18 years with PFP, excluding those involved in any sport other than running., as well as those with prior knee surgeries, the history or presence of other knee pathologies, or pediatric populations. The review focused on studies utilizing NME or RRT for PFP treatment, adhering to ACSM guidelines and excluding studies only providing study protocols. Exercise reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template. NME protocols were analyzed using the FITT framework (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type). RRT protocols were evaluated by session frequency, start timing, clinician input, cadence, feedback, footwear use, speed changes, self-rehabilitation, and progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were reviewed. The timing and complementarity of RRT with NME were often absent or poorly defined. NME mainly focused on single-leg squats in seven protocols, with forward lunges, step-downs, and trunk-rotating squats in three studies each. These exercises emphasized trunk inclination and gluteal activation, with variations in feedback, sets, reps, and progression. RRT treatment ranged from a single 10-minute retraining session to 12 weekly sessions. Cadence increase was addressed in six studies, dynamic valgus in four, with most feedback being auditory/visual. Minimalist shoes were used in two studies, and three standardized running speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A notable variability exists in interventions for PFP in runners, especially in the timing and complementarity of RRT and NME. A standardized reporting system is needed to better analyze study protocol implementation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 8","pages":"1107-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Farraj, Thomas Guilhem, Joachim Van Cant, Alexandre Rambaud\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.141861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review examined the use of RRT and NME, either combined or standalone, in runners with PFP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases searched included MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. The scoping review followed the PRISMA-SCR framework, using population, concept, and context criteria. The population included recreational to professional runners over 18 years with PFP, excluding those involved in any sport other than running., as well as those with prior knee surgeries, the history or presence of other knee pathologies, or pediatric populations. The review focused on studies utilizing NME or RRT for PFP treatment, adhering to ACSM guidelines and excluding studies only providing study protocols. Exercise reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template. NME protocols were analyzed using the FITT framework (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type). RRT protocols were evaluated by session frequency, start timing, clinician input, cadence, feedback, footwear use, speed changes, self-rehabilitation, and progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were reviewed. The timing and complementarity of RRT with NME were often absent or poorly defined. NME mainly focused on single-leg squats in seven protocols, with forward lunges, step-downs, and trunk-rotating squats in three studies each. These exercises emphasized trunk inclination and gluteal activation, with variations in feedback, sets, reps, and progression. RRT treatment ranged from a single 10-minute retraining session to 12 weekly sessions. Cadence increase was addressed in six studies, dynamic valgus in four, with most feedback being auditory/visual. Minimalist shoes were used in two studies, and three standardized running speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A notable variability exists in interventions for PFP in runners, especially in the timing and complementarity of RRT and NME. A standardized reporting system is needed to better analyze study protocol implementation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>N/A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"1107-1121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在治疗跑步者髌骨股痛(PFP)时,临床医生的目标是减轻患者的症状,如疼痛和不适。跑步再训练技术(RRT)和神经肌肉训练(NME)是实现这些目标的关键干预措施。目的:本综述研究了RRT和NME在PFP患者中的联合或单独应用。研究设计:范围审查。方法:检索MEDLINE、ScienceDirect、谷歌Scholar等数据库。两名研究人员独立确定了符合条件的研究并提取了数据。范围审查遵循PRISMA-SCR框架,使用人口、概念和上下文标准。研究人群包括18岁以上的PFP患者,从休闲到专业的跑步者,不包括参加除跑步以外的任何运动的人。,以及既往膝关节手术,其他膝关节疾病史或存在者,或儿科人群。本综述集中于使用NME或RRT治疗PFP的研究,遵循ACSM指南,排除仅提供研究方案的研究。使用运动报告模板共识评估运动报告。使用FITT框架(频率、强度、时间、类型)分析NME协议。通过会话频率、开始时间、临床医生输入、节奏、反馈、鞋类使用、速度变化、自我康复和进展来评估RRT方案。结果:回顾了15项研究。RRT与NME的时间和互补性往往不存在或定义不清。NME主要集中在七个方案中的单腿深蹲,以及三个研究中的前弓步,下蹲和躯干旋转深蹲。这些练习强调躯干倾斜和臀肌激活,在反馈、组、重复和进展上有变化。RRT治疗的范围从单次10分钟的再训练到每周12次的再训练。6项研究解决了节奏增加问题,4项研究解决了动态外翻问题,大多数反馈是听觉/视觉的。两项研究使用极简跑鞋,三项研究使用标准化的跑步速度。结论:跑步者的PFP干预存在显著的可变性,特别是在RRT和NME的时间和互补性方面。需要一个标准化的报告系统来更好地分析研究方案的执行情况。证据级别:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review.

Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review.

Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review.

Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review.

Background: When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals.

Purpose: This scoping review examined the use of RRT and NME, either combined or standalone, in runners with PFP.

Study design: Scoping review.

Methods: Databases searched included MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. The scoping review followed the PRISMA-SCR framework, using population, concept, and context criteria. The population included recreational to professional runners over 18 years with PFP, excluding those involved in any sport other than running., as well as those with prior knee surgeries, the history or presence of other knee pathologies, or pediatric populations. The review focused on studies utilizing NME or RRT for PFP treatment, adhering to ACSM guidelines and excluding studies only providing study protocols. Exercise reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template. NME protocols were analyzed using the FITT framework (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type). RRT protocols were evaluated by session frequency, start timing, clinician input, cadence, feedback, footwear use, speed changes, self-rehabilitation, and progression.

Results: Fifteen studies were reviewed. The timing and complementarity of RRT with NME were often absent or poorly defined. NME mainly focused on single-leg squats in seven protocols, with forward lunges, step-downs, and trunk-rotating squats in three studies each. These exercises emphasized trunk inclination and gluteal activation, with variations in feedback, sets, reps, and progression. RRT treatment ranged from a single 10-minute retraining session to 12 weekly sessions. Cadence increase was addressed in six studies, dynamic valgus in four, with most feedback being auditory/visual. Minimalist shoes were used in two studies, and three standardized running speed.

Conclusion: A notable variability exists in interventions for PFP in runners, especially in the timing and complementarity of RRT and NME. A standardized reporting system is needed to better analyze study protocol implementation.

Level of evidence: N/A.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信