药物治疗对耐力运动员运动性支气管收缩和过敏性炎症反应的影响。

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.141859
Ronaldo Aparecido da Silva, Renata Nakata Teixeira, Gerson Dos Santos Leite, Rosana C Agondi, Renata Gorjão, Cristina Maria Kokron, Yara Nely Fiks, Celso Ricardo Fernandes Carvalho
{"title":"药物治疗对耐力运动员运动性支气管收缩和过敏性炎症反应的影响。","authors":"Ronaldo Aparecido da Silva, Renata Nakata Teixeira, Gerson Dos Santos Leite, Rosana C Agondi, Renata Gorjão, Cristina Maria Kokron, Yara Nely Fiks, Celso Ricardo Fernandes Carvalho","doi":"10.26603/001c.141859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endurance athletes (EA) with lung disease and allergic inflammation have worse performance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether pharmacological treatment can reduce airway disorders such as exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and allergic inflammatory response (AIR) in EA.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EA who were marathon runners underwent eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) for screening assessment. EA who fulfilled the criteria for an EIB+ after an EVH were included in the treatment group (EIB+; n=13), and those who did not were included in the control group (CON; n=18). The athletes were assessed before and 30 days after the intervention. Outcomes included cardiopulmonary exercise testing, lung function, allergic symptoms (allergic questionnaire for athletes [AQUA©]), AIR (T helper [Th]-1, Th2, and Th17 lymphocytes in cell cultures), inflammatory mediator expression, salivary immunoglobulin (Ig)A, blood cortisol, blood IgE levels, and airway inflammation (fraction exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]). Both groups were advised to keep the same training routine, and only the EIB+ received pharmacological treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (400-800 mcg/day) and long-acting bronchodilators (12 mcg/day). The CON and EIB+ groups underwent the same assessments after the intervention and were compared pre- and post-intervention, and effect sizes were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EIB+ (males, age 28.1±7.4 years, BMI 20.3±1.0 kg/m2) CON (males, age 29.8±6.5 years, BMI 20.5±1.6 kg/m2) participated. At baseline, the O2 peak, lung function, allergic symptoms, IgE, IgA, FeNO levels, and AIR were not significancly different between groups (p>0.05). After pharmacological treatment, only the EIB+ group showed a decrease in EIB (p<0.001) and an increase in VO2peak compared to baseline (p<0.05). However, no difference was observed in the expression of inflammatory mediators (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacological treatment reduces EIB and increases the aerobic perforance/fitness in endurance athletes. These benefits occur without modification of the AIR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II- Prospective Comparative Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 8","pages":"1222-1231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Pharmacological Treatment on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and Allergic Inflammatory Response in Endurance Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Ronaldo Aparecido da Silva, Renata Nakata Teixeira, Gerson Dos Santos Leite, Rosana C Agondi, Renata Gorjão, Cristina Maria Kokron, Yara Nely Fiks, Celso Ricardo Fernandes Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.141859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endurance athletes (EA) with lung disease and allergic inflammation have worse performance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether pharmacological treatment can reduce airway disorders such as exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and allergic inflammatory response (AIR) in EA.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EA who were marathon runners underwent eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) for screening assessment. EA who fulfilled the criteria for an EIB+ after an EVH were included in the treatment group (EIB+; n=13), and those who did not were included in the control group (CON; n=18). The athletes were assessed before and 30 days after the intervention. Outcomes included cardiopulmonary exercise testing, lung function, allergic symptoms (allergic questionnaire for athletes [AQUA©]), AIR (T helper [Th]-1, Th2, and Th17 lymphocytes in cell cultures), inflammatory mediator expression, salivary immunoglobulin (Ig)A, blood cortisol, blood IgE levels, and airway inflammation (fraction exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]). Both groups were advised to keep the same training routine, and only the EIB+ received pharmacological treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (400-800 mcg/day) and long-acting bronchodilators (12 mcg/day). The CON and EIB+ groups underwent the same assessments after the intervention and were compared pre- and post-intervention, and effect sizes were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EIB+ (males, age 28.1±7.4 years, BMI 20.3±1.0 kg/m2) CON (males, age 29.8±6.5 years, BMI 20.5±1.6 kg/m2) participated. At baseline, the O2 peak, lung function, allergic symptoms, IgE, IgA, FeNO levels, and AIR were not significancly different between groups (p>0.05). After pharmacological treatment, only the EIB+ group showed a decrease in EIB (p<0.001) and an increase in VO2peak compared to baseline (p<0.05). However, no difference was observed in the expression of inflammatory mediators (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacological treatment reduces EIB and increases the aerobic perforance/fitness in endurance athletes. These benefits occur without modification of the AIR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II- Prospective Comparative Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"1222-1231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有肺部疾病和过敏性炎症的耐力运动员(EA)表现较差。目的:探讨药物治疗是否能减少运动性支气管收缩(EIB)和过敏性炎症反应(AIR)等气道疾病。研究设计:前瞻性、对照临床试验。方法:对参加马拉松比赛的EA患者进行自发性超换气(EVH)筛查评估。EVH后符合EIB+标准的EA被纳入治疗组(EIB+;n=13),未纳入对照组(CON;n = 18)。在干预前和干预后30天对运动员进行评估。结果包括心肺运动试验、肺功能、过敏症状(运动员过敏问卷[AQUA©])、AIR(细胞培养中辅助性T [Th]-1、Th2和Th17淋巴细胞)、炎症介质表达、唾液免疫球蛋白(Ig)A、血液皮质醇、血液IgE水平和气道炎症(呼出一氧化氮分数[FeNO])。建议两组保持相同的训练常规,只有EIB+组接受吸入皮质类固醇(400-800微克/天)和长效支气管扩张剂(12微克/天)的药物治疗。CON组和EIB+组在干预后进行相同的评估,并比较干预前和干预后的效果,并计算效应量。结果:参加EIB+(男性,年龄28.1±7.4岁,BMI 20.3±1.0 kg/m2) CON(男性,年龄29.8±6.5岁,BMI 20.5±1.6 kg/m2)。基线时,两组患者的O2峰值、肺功能、过敏症状、IgE、IgA、FeNO水平、AIR均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。药物治疗后,只有EIB+组EIB降低(p0.05)。结论:药物治疗可降低耐力运动员的EIB,提高有氧运动能力。这些好处无需修改AIR即可实现。证据等级:二级——前瞻性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Pharmacological Treatment on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and Allergic Inflammatory Response in Endurance Athletes.

Effect of Pharmacological Treatment on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and Allergic Inflammatory Response in Endurance Athletes.

Effect of Pharmacological Treatment on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and Allergic Inflammatory Response in Endurance Athletes.

Background: Endurance athletes (EA) with lung disease and allergic inflammation have worse performance.

Purpose: To examine whether pharmacological treatment can reduce airway disorders such as exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and allergic inflammatory response (AIR) in EA.

Study design: Prospective, controlled clinical trial.

Methods: EA who were marathon runners underwent eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) for screening assessment. EA who fulfilled the criteria for an EIB+ after an EVH were included in the treatment group (EIB+; n=13), and those who did not were included in the control group (CON; n=18). The athletes were assessed before and 30 days after the intervention. Outcomes included cardiopulmonary exercise testing, lung function, allergic symptoms (allergic questionnaire for athletes [AQUA©]), AIR (T helper [Th]-1, Th2, and Th17 lymphocytes in cell cultures), inflammatory mediator expression, salivary immunoglobulin (Ig)A, blood cortisol, blood IgE levels, and airway inflammation (fraction exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]). Both groups were advised to keep the same training routine, and only the EIB+ received pharmacological treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (400-800 mcg/day) and long-acting bronchodilators (12 mcg/day). The CON and EIB+ groups underwent the same assessments after the intervention and were compared pre- and post-intervention, and effect sizes were calculated.

Results: EIB+ (males, age 28.1±7.4 years, BMI 20.3±1.0 kg/m2) CON (males, age 29.8±6.5 years, BMI 20.5±1.6 kg/m2) participated. At baseline, the O2 peak, lung function, allergic symptoms, IgE, IgA, FeNO levels, and AIR were not significancly different between groups (p>0.05). After pharmacological treatment, only the EIB+ group showed a decrease in EIB (p<0.001) and an increase in VO2peak compared to baseline (p<0.05). However, no difference was observed in the expression of inflammatory mediators (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Pharmacological treatment reduces EIB and increases the aerobic perforance/fitness in endurance athletes. These benefits occur without modification of the AIR.

Level of evidence: Level II- Prospective Comparative Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信