应用人工智能算法对颌面部病变的精确诊断:系统综述。

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s12663-025-02664-4
Meysam Rahmanzadeh, Auob Rustamzadeh, Enam Alhagh Gorgich, Hajir Mehrbani, Arezoo Aghakouchakzadeh
{"title":"应用人工智能算法对颌面部病变的精确诊断:系统综述。","authors":"Meysam Rahmanzadeh, Auob Rustamzadeh, Enam Alhagh Gorgich, Hajir Mehrbani, Arezoo Aghakouchakzadeh","doi":"10.1007/s12663-025-02664-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review highlights the potential of artificial intelligence algorithms, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), in improving the diagnosis and management of oral and maxillofacial diseases through advanced imaging techniques such as computerized tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current review was conducted on the basis of ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2010-2024) using keywords related to radiography, MRI, CT, CBCT, ML, DL, and maxillofacial pathology, with a focus on clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL algorithms for detecting vertical root fractures achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 89.0% for premolars, with a sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 94.0%. It demonstrated an accuracy of 93% and a specificity of 88% in evaluating CBCT images. The GoogLeNet Inception v3 architecture achieved an AUC of 0.914, sensitivity of 96.1%, and specificity of 77.1% for CBCT, outperforming the panoramic radiograph, which had an AUC of 0.847, sensitivity of 88.2%, and specificity of 77.0%. CBCT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (91.4%) than panoramic images (84.6%), with odontogenic cystic lesions exhibiting the highest accuracy. The U-Net-based DL algorithm achieves recall, precision, and F1 scores of 0.742, 0.942, and 0.831 for metastatic lymph nodes, and 0.782, 0.990, and 0.874 for nonmetastatic lymph nodes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the superior anatomical detail of CBCT, making it more reliable for diagnosing oral and dentomaxillofacial disorders. DL algorithms demonstrate high accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing dental and odontogenic disorders and often outperform radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"24 4","pages":"1151-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Precision Diagnosis of Maxillofacial Pathologies by Artificial Intelligence Algorithms: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Meysam Rahmanzadeh, Auob Rustamzadeh, Enam Alhagh Gorgich, Hajir Mehrbani, Arezoo Aghakouchakzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12663-025-02664-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review highlights the potential of artificial intelligence algorithms, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), in improving the diagnosis and management of oral and maxillofacial diseases through advanced imaging techniques such as computerized tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current review was conducted on the basis of ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2010-2024) using keywords related to radiography, MRI, CT, CBCT, ML, DL, and maxillofacial pathology, with a focus on clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL algorithms for detecting vertical root fractures achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 89.0% for premolars, with a sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 94.0%. It demonstrated an accuracy of 93% and a specificity of 88% in evaluating CBCT images. The GoogLeNet Inception v3 architecture achieved an AUC of 0.914, sensitivity of 96.1%, and specificity of 77.1% for CBCT, outperforming the panoramic radiograph, which had an AUC of 0.847, sensitivity of 88.2%, and specificity of 77.0%. CBCT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (91.4%) than panoramic images (84.6%), with odontogenic cystic lesions exhibiting the highest accuracy. The U-Net-based DL algorithm achieves recall, precision, and F1 scores of 0.742, 0.942, and 0.831 for metastatic lymph nodes, and 0.782, 0.990, and 0.874 for nonmetastatic lymph nodes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the superior anatomical detail of CBCT, making it more reliable for diagnosing oral and dentomaxillofacial disorders. DL algorithms demonstrate high accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing dental and odontogenic disorders and often outperform radiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"1151-1178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02664-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02664-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文综述了人工智能算法,包括机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL),通过先进的成像技术,如计算机断层扫描(CT)和锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),在改善口腔颌面疾病的诊断和管理方面的潜力。方法:本综述基于ISI Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus和谷歌Scholar(2010-2024)数据库,使用影像学、MRI、CT、CBCT、ML、DL、颌面病理学等相关关键词,重点关注临床应用。结果:DL算法对前磨牙垂直牙根骨折的诊断准确率为89.0%,敏感性为84.0%,特异性为94.0%。它在评估CBCT图像时显示出93%的准确性和88%的特异性。GoogLeNet Inception v3架构对CBCT的AUC为0.914,灵敏度为96.1%,特异性为77.1%,优于全景x线片的AUC为0.847,灵敏度为88.2%,特异性为77.0%。CBCT的诊断准确率(91.4%)高于全景图像(84.6%),其中牙源性囊性病变的准确率最高。基于u - net的深度学习算法对于转移性淋巴结的查全率、查准率和F1得分分别为0.742、0.942和0.831,对于非转移性淋巴结的查全率、查准率和F1得分分别为0.782、0.990和0.874。结论:本研究突出了CBCT优越的解剖细节,使其在口腔和牙颌面疾病的诊断中更加可靠。DL算法在诊断牙齿和牙源性疾病方面表现出很高的准确性和敏感性,并且通常优于放射科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward Precision Diagnosis of Maxillofacial Pathologies by Artificial Intelligence Algorithms: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: This review highlights the potential of artificial intelligence algorithms, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), in improving the diagnosis and management of oral and maxillofacial diseases through advanced imaging techniques such as computerized tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods: The current review was conducted on the basis of ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2010-2024) using keywords related to radiography, MRI, CT, CBCT, ML, DL, and maxillofacial pathology, with a focus on clinical applications.

Results: The DL algorithms for detecting vertical root fractures achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 89.0% for premolars, with a sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 94.0%. It demonstrated an accuracy of 93% and a specificity of 88% in evaluating CBCT images. The GoogLeNet Inception v3 architecture achieved an AUC of 0.914, sensitivity of 96.1%, and specificity of 77.1% for CBCT, outperforming the panoramic radiograph, which had an AUC of 0.847, sensitivity of 88.2%, and specificity of 77.0%. CBCT demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (91.4%) than panoramic images (84.6%), with odontogenic cystic lesions exhibiting the highest accuracy. The U-Net-based DL algorithm achieves recall, precision, and F1 scores of 0.742, 0.942, and 0.831 for metastatic lymph nodes, and 0.782, 0.990, and 0.874 for nonmetastatic lymph nodes, respectively.

Conclusion: This study highlights the superior anatomical detail of CBCT, making it more reliable for diagnosing oral and dentomaxillofacial disorders. DL algorithms demonstrate high accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing dental and odontogenic disorders and often outperform radiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信