{"title":"即刻加载与延迟加载牙种植体临床与影像学变化的比较评价。","authors":"Amanjyot Kaur Bains, Amit Dhawan, Tejinder Kaur Gumber, Ramandeep Singh Bhullar, Sarika Kapila","doi":"10.1007/s12663-025-02495-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study is to compare the marginal bone level changes and implant survival rate between immediately loaded non-submerged versus delayed loaded submerged dental implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The implant sites of 20 patients were divided into two groups-Group A (implant placement was done by immediate loading protocol) and Group B patients (implant placement was done by conventional delayed loading protocol). Clinical parameters that were recorded include implant stability, radiographic assessment for crestal bone changes, gingival status, probing depth, and complications. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA, <i>t</i> test, and chi-square test (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On intergroup comparison, gingival status was more maintained in the case of the immediate loading group, while there was no statistically significant difference in implant stability and marginal bone loss. Complications were reported in both groups but were statistically insignificant in comparison between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate loading is a viable treatment modality and can lead to satisfactory clinical and aesthetic outcomes. The provision of an immediate restoration may lead to improved aesthetic outcomes as evidenced by gingival status evaluation when compared to delayed loading.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"24 4","pages":"952-961"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Between Immediate Loading Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Amanjyot Kaur Bains, Amit Dhawan, Tejinder Kaur Gumber, Ramandeep Singh Bhullar, Sarika Kapila\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12663-025-02495-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study is to compare the marginal bone level changes and implant survival rate between immediately loaded non-submerged versus delayed loaded submerged dental implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The implant sites of 20 patients were divided into two groups-Group A (implant placement was done by immediate loading protocol) and Group B patients (implant placement was done by conventional delayed loading protocol). Clinical parameters that were recorded include implant stability, radiographic assessment for crestal bone changes, gingival status, probing depth, and complications. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA, <i>t</i> test, and chi-square test (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On intergroup comparison, gingival status was more maintained in the case of the immediate loading group, while there was no statistically significant difference in implant stability and marginal bone loss. Complications were reported in both groups but were statistically insignificant in comparison between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate loading is a viable treatment modality and can lead to satisfactory clinical and aesthetic outcomes. The provision of an immediate restoration may lead to improved aesthetic outcomes as evidenced by gingival status evaluation when compared to delayed loading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"952-961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02495-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02495-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Changes Between Immediate Loading Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants.
Aim: The aim of the present study is to compare the marginal bone level changes and implant survival rate between immediately loaded non-submerged versus delayed loaded submerged dental implants.
Materials and methods: The implant sites of 20 patients were divided into two groups-Group A (implant placement was done by immediate loading protocol) and Group B patients (implant placement was done by conventional delayed loading protocol). Clinical parameters that were recorded include implant stability, radiographic assessment for crestal bone changes, gingival status, probing depth, and complications. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA, t test, and chi-square test (p < 0.05).
Results: On intergroup comparison, gingival status was more maintained in the case of the immediate loading group, while there was no statistically significant difference in implant stability and marginal bone loss. Complications were reported in both groups but were statistically insignificant in comparison between groups.
Conclusion: Immediate loading is a viable treatment modality and can lead to satisfactory clinical and aesthetic outcomes. The provision of an immediate restoration may lead to improved aesthetic outcomes as evidenced by gingival status evaluation when compared to delayed loading.
期刊介绍：
This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
