经骨瓣入路骨密度成骨术与骨切开术的鼻窦提升术:系统回顾。

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s12663-025-02585-2
Prathamesh Moreshwar Dhore, Adil Gandevivala, Srivalli Natarajan
{"title":"经骨瓣入路骨密度成骨术与骨切开术的鼻窦提升术:系统回顾。","authors":"Prathamesh Moreshwar Dhore, Adil Gandevivala, Srivalli Natarajan","doi":"10.1007/s12663-025-02585-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review is to critically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Osseodensification and Osteotome techniques in the transcrestal approach for sinus floor elevation in patients with posterior atrophic maxilla thereby providing valuable insights into the selection of the most appropriate approach for sinus lifting procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic and comprehensive search of electronic databases over the last ten years, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library, was conducted using the formulated search strategy. The protocol was registered in the International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42023455968) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=455968).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies consistently reported varying degrees of implant stability following both Osseodensification and Osteotome techniques. The exact quantitative differences were not uniform across studies. Findings regarding marginal bone loss were mixed and found no significant differences. Residual bone height and bone gain were generally improved with both techniques, but the magnitude of improvement varied among studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review recognizes the potential advantages of Osseodensification but also highlights the heterogeneity in study designs and results, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive and standardized research to provide more definitive clinical guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"24 4","pages":"929-936"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sinus Lifting Procedure Using Osseodensification Versus Osteotome Technique Via Transcrestal Approach: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Prathamesh Moreshwar Dhore, Adil Gandevivala, Srivalli Natarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12663-025-02585-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review is to critically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Osseodensification and Osteotome techniques in the transcrestal approach for sinus floor elevation in patients with posterior atrophic maxilla thereby providing valuable insights into the selection of the most appropriate approach for sinus lifting procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic and comprehensive search of electronic databases over the last ten years, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library, was conducted using the formulated search strategy. The protocol was registered in the International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42023455968) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=455968).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies consistently reported varying degrees of implant stability following both Osseodensification and Osteotome techniques. The exact quantitative differences were not uniform across studies. Findings regarding marginal bone loss were mixed and found no significant differences. Residual bone height and bone gain were generally improved with both techniques, but the magnitude of improvement varied among studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review recognizes the potential advantages of Osseodensification but also highlights the heterogeneity in study designs and results, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive and standardized research to provide more definitive clinical guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"929-936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02585-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02585-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述的目的是批判性地评估和比较骨密度化和成骨技术在经瓣入路治疗上颌后萎缩患者窦底抬高手术中的有效性,从而为选择最合适的窦底抬高手术入路提供有价值的见解。材料与方法:采用制定的检索策略,对PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane Library等近十年的电子数据库进行系统、全面的检索。该方案已在国际系统评价注册(PROSPERO)(CRD42023455968) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=455968).Results)上注册:研究一致报告在骨密度化和成骨技术后种植体的稳定性不同程度。在不同的研究中,确切的数量差异并不一致。关于边缘骨质流失的研究结果是混合的,没有发现显著的差异。残骨高度和骨增重在两种技术下均有改善,但改善的幅度在不同的研究中有所不同。结论:本综述承认骨致密化的潜在优势,但也强调了研究设计和结果的异质性,强调需要更全面和标准化的研究,以提供更明确的临床指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sinus Lifting Procedure Using Osseodensification Versus Osteotome Technique Via Transcrestal Approach: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review is to critically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Osseodensification and Osteotome techniques in the transcrestal approach for sinus floor elevation in patients with posterior atrophic maxilla thereby providing valuable insights into the selection of the most appropriate approach for sinus lifting procedures.

Materials and methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of electronic databases over the last ten years, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library, was conducted using the formulated search strategy. The protocol was registered in the International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42023455968) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=455968).

Results: Studies consistently reported varying degrees of implant stability following both Osseodensification and Osteotome techniques. The exact quantitative differences were not uniform across studies. Findings regarding marginal bone loss were mixed and found no significant differences. Residual bone height and bone gain were generally improved with both techniques, but the magnitude of improvement varied among studies.

Conclusion: The review recognizes the potential advantages of Osseodensification but also highlights the heterogeneity in study designs and results, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive and standardized research to provide more definitive clinical guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信