人类在行走时如何处理任务切换的视听线索?脑电图/ERP研究。

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Julian Elias Reiser, Gerhard Rinkenauer, Stefan Arnau, Lewis L Chuang, Edmund Wascher
{"title":"人类在行走时如何处理任务切换的视听线索?脑电图/ERP研究。","authors":"Julian Elias Reiser, Gerhard Rinkenauer, Stefan Arnau, Lewis L Chuang, Edmund Wascher","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary work environments require humans to process audiovisual information displays during active locomotion. The attentional demands associated with using devices such as in-ear headphones and head-mounted displays may be significantly influenced by varying locomotor demands, yet this relationship remains poorly understood. This study investigates the interplay of information presentation modality, movement state, and cognitive task difficulty. In a virtual reality laboratory, 22 participants performed a cued task-switch paradigm with three cognitive task difficulty levels while standing, walking, or walking with perturbations on a treadmill. We used a questionnaire, behavioral, and mobile EEG data to investigate cognitive-motor interference. We find that locomotion interfered with cognitive task performance, and that the presentation modality of task-switch notification modified the nature of this interference. While auditory cue presentation resulted in faster responses under low cognitive load conditions, visual information presentation was less impaired by higher cognitive and locomotor demands. A detailed analysis of the EEG response to cues addressed these differences in terms of multi-modal attentional mechanisms. Hence, information presentation on wearable devices should be tailored to the specific task demands, particularly for cognitively demanding information in mobile work settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 8","pages":"e70122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Humans Process Audiovisual Cues for Task-Switching While Walking? An EEG/ERP Study.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Elias Reiser, Gerhard Rinkenauer, Stefan Arnau, Lewis L Chuang, Edmund Wascher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contemporary work environments require humans to process audiovisual information displays during active locomotion. The attentional demands associated with using devices such as in-ear headphones and head-mounted displays may be significantly influenced by varying locomotor demands, yet this relationship remains poorly understood. This study investigates the interplay of information presentation modality, movement state, and cognitive task difficulty. In a virtual reality laboratory, 22 participants performed a cued task-switch paradigm with three cognitive task difficulty levels while standing, walking, or walking with perturbations on a treadmill. We used a questionnaire, behavioral, and mobile EEG data to investigate cognitive-motor interference. We find that locomotion interfered with cognitive task performance, and that the presentation modality of task-switch notification modified the nature of this interference. While auditory cue presentation resulted in faster responses under low cognitive load conditions, visual information presentation was less impaired by higher cognitive and locomotor demands. A detailed analysis of the EEG response to cues addressed these differences in terms of multi-modal attentional mechanisms. Hence, information presentation on wearable devices should be tailored to the specific task demands, particularly for cognitively demanding information in mobile work settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 8\",\"pages\":\"e70122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代工作环境要求人类在主动运动时处理视听信息显示。与使用入耳式耳机和头戴式显示器等设备相关的注意需求可能会受到不同运动需求的显著影响,但这种关系仍然知之甚少。本研究探讨了信息呈现方式、运动状态与认知任务难度的相互作用。在虚拟现实实验室中,22名参与者在跑步机上站立、行走或行走时进行了三种认知任务难度水平的提示任务切换范式。我们使用问卷调查、行为和移动脑电图数据来调查认知-运动干扰。我们发现运动干扰认知任务的表现,而任务切换通知的呈现方式改变了这种干扰的性质。在低认知负荷条件下,听觉提示的呈现导致更快的反应,而视觉信息的呈现受到更高认知和运动要求的损害较小。详细分析了脑电图对线索的反应,从多模态注意机制的角度解决了这些差异。因此,可穿戴设备上的信息呈现应该针对特定的任务需求进行定制,特别是对于移动工作环境中认知要求高的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How Do Humans Process Audiovisual Cues for Task-Switching While Walking? An EEG/ERP Study.

How Do Humans Process Audiovisual Cues for Task-Switching While Walking? An EEG/ERP Study.

How Do Humans Process Audiovisual Cues for Task-Switching While Walking? An EEG/ERP Study.

How Do Humans Process Audiovisual Cues for Task-Switching While Walking? An EEG/ERP Study.

Contemporary work environments require humans to process audiovisual information displays during active locomotion. The attentional demands associated with using devices such as in-ear headphones and head-mounted displays may be significantly influenced by varying locomotor demands, yet this relationship remains poorly understood. This study investigates the interplay of information presentation modality, movement state, and cognitive task difficulty. In a virtual reality laboratory, 22 participants performed a cued task-switch paradigm with three cognitive task difficulty levels while standing, walking, or walking with perturbations on a treadmill. We used a questionnaire, behavioral, and mobile EEG data to investigate cognitive-motor interference. We find that locomotion interfered with cognitive task performance, and that the presentation modality of task-switch notification modified the nature of this interference. While auditory cue presentation resulted in faster responses under low cognitive load conditions, visual information presentation was less impaired by higher cognitive and locomotor demands. A detailed analysis of the EEG response to cues addressed these differences in terms of multi-modal attentional mechanisms. Hence, information presentation on wearable devices should be tailored to the specific task demands, particularly for cognitively demanding information in mobile work settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信