无标记下肢关节运动学和动力学回归运动筛选任务的会话间可靠性。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2541490
Jiaming Xu, Zhishen Wen, Sylvia Augustine, Raihana Sharir, Camilla De Bleecker, Mark A Robinson, Parunchaya Jamkrajang, Annemie Smeets, Jos Vanrenterghem
{"title":"无标记下肢关节运动学和动力学回归运动筛选任务的会话间可靠性。","authors":"Jiaming Xu, Zhishen Wen, Sylvia Augustine, Raihana Sharir, Camilla De Bleecker, Mark A Robinson, Parunchaya Jamkrajang, Annemie Smeets, Jos Vanrenterghem","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2541490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluating movement quality in dynamic tasks is vital in return-to-sport (RTS) decision-making, yet marker-based motion capture (MoCap) can be complex. This study assessed the inter-session reliability of lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics obtained using Theia3D, a markerless MoCap solution, during dynamic RTS screening tasks. Eighteen healthy participants performed six tasks over two sessions. Joint kinematics and kinetics were evaluated for absolute reliability between sessions, for discrete values and time-varying profiles. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using (integrated) intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). With few exceptions, integrated ICC values of joint angular displacements and moments showed moderate-to-excellent reliability (0.61-0.86 and 0.62-0.90 for angles in the sagittal and frontal plane, respectively; 0.54-0.88 and 0.51-0.85 for moments). SEM values for joint angles were low, indicating minimal session-to-session variation for kinematics. However, most MDC values were relatively high compared to expected intervention effects, particularly showing that kinetic measurements may not yet accurately detect clinically meaningful changes. Overall, these findings thus support the markerless MoCap's potential for tracking lower extremity dynamics during RTS screening, particularly for kinematics and sagittal plane kinetics, but highlight limited inter-session reliability for frontal plane kinetic parameters at the hip and ankle.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2576-2590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-session reliability of markerless lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics for return-to-sport screening tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaming Xu, Zhishen Wen, Sylvia Augustine, Raihana Sharir, Camilla De Bleecker, Mark A Robinson, Parunchaya Jamkrajang, Annemie Smeets, Jos Vanrenterghem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2541490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evaluating movement quality in dynamic tasks is vital in return-to-sport (RTS) decision-making, yet marker-based motion capture (MoCap) can be complex. This study assessed the inter-session reliability of lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics obtained using Theia3D, a markerless MoCap solution, during dynamic RTS screening tasks. Eighteen healthy participants performed six tasks over two sessions. Joint kinematics and kinetics were evaluated for absolute reliability between sessions, for discrete values and time-varying profiles. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using (integrated) intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). With few exceptions, integrated ICC values of joint angular displacements and moments showed moderate-to-excellent reliability (0.61-0.86 and 0.62-0.90 for angles in the sagittal and frontal plane, respectively; 0.54-0.88 and 0.51-0.85 for moments). SEM values for joint angles were low, indicating minimal session-to-session variation for kinematics. However, most MDC values were relatively high compared to expected intervention effects, particularly showing that kinetic measurements may not yet accurately detect clinically meaningful changes. Overall, these findings thus support the markerless MoCap's potential for tracking lower extremity dynamics during RTS screening, particularly for kinematics and sagittal plane kinetics, but highlight limited inter-session reliability for frontal plane kinetic parameters at the hip and ankle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2576-2590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2541490\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2541490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估动态任务中的运动质量对于RTS决策至关重要,但基于标记的动作捕捉(MoCap)可能很复杂。本研究评估了在动态RTS筛选任务中使用Theia3D(无标记MoCap解决方案)获得的下肢关节运动学和动力学的会话间可靠性。18名健康的参与者在两次会议中完成了6项任务。关节运动学和动力学评估绝对可靠性之间的会议,离散值和时变剖面。使用(综合)类内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)评估重测信度。除了少数例外,关节角位移和力矩的综合ICC值显示出中等至优异的可靠性(矢状面和正面角度分别为0.61-0.86和0.62-0.90);力矩为0.54-0.88和0.51-0.85)。关节角的扫描电镜值很低,表明运动学的最小变化。然而,与预期的干预效果相比,大多数MDC值相对较高,特别是表明动力学测量可能尚未准确检测到临床有意义的变化。总的来说,这些研究结果支持无标记动作捕捉在RTS筛查过程中跟踪下肢动态的潜力,特别是运动学和矢状面动力学,但强调了髋关节和踝关节正面动力学参数的有限可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inter-session reliability of markerless lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics for return-to-sport screening tasks.

Evaluating movement quality in dynamic tasks is vital in return-to-sport (RTS) decision-making, yet marker-based motion capture (MoCap) can be complex. This study assessed the inter-session reliability of lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics obtained using Theia3D, a markerless MoCap solution, during dynamic RTS screening tasks. Eighteen healthy participants performed six tasks over two sessions. Joint kinematics and kinetics were evaluated for absolute reliability between sessions, for discrete values and time-varying profiles. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using (integrated) intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). With few exceptions, integrated ICC values of joint angular displacements and moments showed moderate-to-excellent reliability (0.61-0.86 and 0.62-0.90 for angles in the sagittal and frontal plane, respectively; 0.54-0.88 and 0.51-0.85 for moments). SEM values for joint angles were low, indicating minimal session-to-session variation for kinematics. However, most MDC values were relatively high compared to expected intervention effects, particularly showing that kinetic measurements may not yet accurately detect clinically meaningful changes. Overall, these findings thus support the markerless MoCap's potential for tracking lower extremity dynamics during RTS screening, particularly for kinematics and sagittal plane kinetics, but highlight limited inter-session reliability for frontal plane kinetic parameters at the hip and ankle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信