{"title":"性别会影响人工晶状体度数的计算吗?公式精度的比较分析。","authors":"Ionela-Iasmina Yasar, Servet Yasar, Leila Al Barri, Diana-Maria Darabus, Alina Iasmina Dumitriu, Mihnea Munteanu, Horia Tudor Stanca","doi":"10.25122/jml-2025-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is a crucial aspect of modern cataract surgery, directly affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. Due to anatomical and physiological differences between male and female eyes, neglecting gender-specific variations may lead to systematic refractive errors in IOL power selection. This research aimed to determine the necessity of incorporating gender as a variable in future IOL calculation algorithms to improve postoperative precision. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 210 eyes that met predefined inclusion criteria. Biometric measurements for assessing intraocular lens power were obtained using the ARGOS optical biometer. The refractive power of the intraocular lenses was calculated using several established formulas, and these values were systematically compared to evaluate their predictive accuracy. A parametric statistical approach was employed, using repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among multiple calculations. The homogeneity of covariances was examined to validate the design of the repeated measures. Pairwise comparisons of the outcomes from different formulas were performed using the Bonferroni correction to identify statistically significant differences. Additionally, paired-sample <i>t</i>-tests were conducted to compare the spherical equivalent values recorded during the initial and final follow-up examinations. Significant differences were observed between genders regarding descriptive features such as age, axial length, keratometry, and white-to-white measurements. Although notable biometric differences exist between genders, they do not seem to affect the discrepancies in intraocular lens power calculations using the tested formulas. However, intra-group differences in intraocular power values suggest that the choice of formula may impact predicted intraocular power differently for men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"18 6","pages":"557-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does gender affect intraocular lens power calculations? A comparative analysis of formula accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Ionela-Iasmina Yasar, Servet Yasar, Leila Al Barri, Diana-Maria Darabus, Alina Iasmina Dumitriu, Mihnea Munteanu, Horia Tudor Stanca\",\"doi\":\"10.25122/jml-2025-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is a crucial aspect of modern cataract surgery, directly affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. Due to anatomical and physiological differences between male and female eyes, neglecting gender-specific variations may lead to systematic refractive errors in IOL power selection. This research aimed to determine the necessity of incorporating gender as a variable in future IOL calculation algorithms to improve postoperative precision. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 210 eyes that met predefined inclusion criteria. Biometric measurements for assessing intraocular lens power were obtained using the ARGOS optical biometer. The refractive power of the intraocular lenses was calculated using several established formulas, and these values were systematically compared to evaluate their predictive accuracy. A parametric statistical approach was employed, using repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among multiple calculations. The homogeneity of covariances was examined to validate the design of the repeated measures. Pairwise comparisons of the outcomes from different formulas were performed using the Bonferroni correction to identify statistically significant differences. Additionally, paired-sample <i>t</i>-tests were conducted to compare the spherical equivalent values recorded during the initial and final follow-up examinations. Significant differences were observed between genders regarding descriptive features such as age, axial length, keratometry, and white-to-white measurements. Although notable biometric differences exist between genders, they do not seem to affect the discrepancies in intraocular lens power calculations using the tested formulas. However, intra-group differences in intraocular power values suggest that the choice of formula may impact predicted intraocular power differently for men and women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"557-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does gender affect intraocular lens power calculations? A comparative analysis of formula accuracy.
Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is a crucial aspect of modern cataract surgery, directly affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. Due to anatomical and physiological differences between male and female eyes, neglecting gender-specific variations may lead to systematic refractive errors in IOL power selection. This research aimed to determine the necessity of incorporating gender as a variable in future IOL calculation algorithms to improve postoperative precision. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 210 eyes that met predefined inclusion criteria. Biometric measurements for assessing intraocular lens power were obtained using the ARGOS optical biometer. The refractive power of the intraocular lenses was calculated using several established formulas, and these values were systematically compared to evaluate their predictive accuracy. A parametric statistical approach was employed, using repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among multiple calculations. The homogeneity of covariances was examined to validate the design of the repeated measures. Pairwise comparisons of the outcomes from different formulas were performed using the Bonferroni correction to identify statistically significant differences. Additionally, paired-sample t-tests were conducted to compare the spherical equivalent values recorded during the initial and final follow-up examinations. Significant differences were observed between genders regarding descriptive features such as age, axial length, keratometry, and white-to-white measurements. Although notable biometric differences exist between genders, they do not seem to affect the discrepancies in intraocular lens power calculations using the tested formulas. However, intra-group differences in intraocular power values suggest that the choice of formula may impact predicted intraocular power differently for men and women.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.