性别会影响人工晶状体度数的计算吗?公式精度的比较分析。

Q3 Medicine
Ionela-Iasmina Yasar, Servet Yasar, Leila Al Barri, Diana-Maria Darabus, Alina Iasmina Dumitriu, Mihnea Munteanu, Horia Tudor Stanca
{"title":"性别会影响人工晶状体度数的计算吗?公式精度的比较分析。","authors":"Ionela-Iasmina Yasar, Servet Yasar, Leila Al Barri, Diana-Maria Darabus, Alina Iasmina Dumitriu, Mihnea Munteanu, Horia Tudor Stanca","doi":"10.25122/jml-2025-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is a crucial aspect of modern cataract surgery, directly affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. Due to anatomical and physiological differences between male and female eyes, neglecting gender-specific variations may lead to systematic refractive errors in IOL power selection. This research aimed to determine the necessity of incorporating gender as a variable in future IOL calculation algorithms to improve postoperative precision. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 210 eyes that met predefined inclusion criteria. Biometric measurements for assessing intraocular lens power were obtained using the ARGOS optical biometer. The refractive power of the intraocular lenses was calculated using several established formulas, and these values were systematically compared to evaluate their predictive accuracy. A parametric statistical approach was employed, using repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among multiple calculations. The homogeneity of covariances was examined to validate the design of the repeated measures. Pairwise comparisons of the outcomes from different formulas were performed using the Bonferroni correction to identify statistically significant differences. Additionally, paired-sample <i>t</i>-tests were conducted to compare the spherical equivalent values recorded during the initial and final follow-up examinations. Significant differences were observed between genders regarding descriptive features such as age, axial length, keratometry, and white-to-white measurements. Although notable biometric differences exist between genders, they do not seem to affect the discrepancies in intraocular lens power calculations using the tested formulas. However, intra-group differences in intraocular power values suggest that the choice of formula may impact predicted intraocular power differently for men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"18 6","pages":"557-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does gender affect intraocular lens power calculations? A comparative analysis of formula accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Ionela-Iasmina Yasar, Servet Yasar, Leila Al Barri, Diana-Maria Darabus, Alina Iasmina Dumitriu, Mihnea Munteanu, Horia Tudor Stanca\",\"doi\":\"10.25122/jml-2025-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is a crucial aspect of modern cataract surgery, directly affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. Due to anatomical and physiological differences between male and female eyes, neglecting gender-specific variations may lead to systematic refractive errors in IOL power selection. This research aimed to determine the necessity of incorporating gender as a variable in future IOL calculation algorithms to improve postoperative precision. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 210 eyes that met predefined inclusion criteria. Biometric measurements for assessing intraocular lens power were obtained using the ARGOS optical biometer. The refractive power of the intraocular lenses was calculated using several established formulas, and these values were systematically compared to evaluate their predictive accuracy. A parametric statistical approach was employed, using repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among multiple calculations. The homogeneity of covariances was examined to validate the design of the repeated measures. Pairwise comparisons of the outcomes from different formulas were performed using the Bonferroni correction to identify statistically significant differences. Additionally, paired-sample <i>t</i>-tests were conducted to compare the spherical equivalent values recorded during the initial and final follow-up examinations. Significant differences were observed between genders regarding descriptive features such as age, axial length, keratometry, and white-to-white measurements. Although notable biometric differences exist between genders, they do not seem to affect the discrepancies in intraocular lens power calculations using the tested formulas. However, intra-group differences in intraocular power values suggest that the choice of formula may impact predicted intraocular power differently for men and women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"557-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工晶状体(IOL)度数计算是现代白内障手术的一个重要方面,直接影响到术后屈光效果。由于男女眼的解剖和生理差异,忽视性别差异可能导致人工晶状体度数选择的系统性屈光不正。本研究旨在确定将性别作为变量纳入未来人工晶状体计算算法的必要性,以提高术后精度。这项回顾性观察性研究分析了210只符合预定纳入标准的眼睛的数据。使用ARGOS光学生物计获得评估人工晶状体度数的生物测量值。使用几个已建立的公式计算人工晶状体的屈光度,并对这些值进行系统比较,以评估其预测准确性。采用参数统计方法,使用重复测量方差分析来评估多次计算之间的差异。检验协方差的同质性,以验证重复测量的设计。使用Bonferroni校正对不同公式的结果进行两两比较,以确定具有统计学意义的差异。此外,进行配对样本t检验以比较初始和最终随访检查期间记录的球形等效值。性别之间在描述性特征如年龄、轴长、角膜测量和白对白测量等方面观察到显著差异。尽管性别之间存在显著的生物特征差异,但它们似乎并不影响使用测试公式计算人工晶状体度数的差异。然而,组内眼力值的差异表明,配方的选择可能对男性和女性的预测眼力产生不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does gender affect intraocular lens power calculations? A comparative analysis of formula accuracy.

Does gender affect intraocular lens power calculations? A comparative analysis of formula accuracy.

Does gender affect intraocular lens power calculations? A comparative analysis of formula accuracy.

Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is a crucial aspect of modern cataract surgery, directly affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. Due to anatomical and physiological differences between male and female eyes, neglecting gender-specific variations may lead to systematic refractive errors in IOL power selection. This research aimed to determine the necessity of incorporating gender as a variable in future IOL calculation algorithms to improve postoperative precision. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 210 eyes that met predefined inclusion criteria. Biometric measurements for assessing intraocular lens power were obtained using the ARGOS optical biometer. The refractive power of the intraocular lenses was calculated using several established formulas, and these values were systematically compared to evaluate their predictive accuracy. A parametric statistical approach was employed, using repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among multiple calculations. The homogeneity of covariances was examined to validate the design of the repeated measures. Pairwise comparisons of the outcomes from different formulas were performed using the Bonferroni correction to identify statistically significant differences. Additionally, paired-sample t-tests were conducted to compare the spherical equivalent values recorded during the initial and final follow-up examinations. Significant differences were observed between genders regarding descriptive features such as age, axial length, keratometry, and white-to-white measurements. Although notable biometric differences exist between genders, they do not seem to affect the discrepancies in intraocular lens power calculations using the tested formulas. However, intra-group differences in intraocular power values suggest that the choice of formula may impact predicted intraocular power differently for men and women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信