数字PCR (dPCR)与定量PCR (qPCR)方法在蛤蜊组织样品中定量两种珀金苏氏菌。

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Journal of invertebrate pathology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jip.2025.108417
Elisa Chailler, Héliaz Le Bayon, Annabelle Dairain, Florentine Riquet, Leslie Stout, Aurélie Chambouvet, Morgan Smits
{"title":"数字PCR (dPCR)与定量PCR (qPCR)方法在蛤蜊组织样品中定量两种珀金苏氏菌。","authors":"Elisa Chailler, Héliaz Le Bayon, Annabelle Dairain, Florentine Riquet, Leslie Stout, Aurélie Chambouvet, Morgan Smits","doi":"10.1016/j.jip.2025.108417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The parasite Perkinsus olseni (Perkinsea, Alveolata), the etiological agent of Perkinsosis, infects a wide range of bivalves and gastropods, including clams, particularly in Europe. This parasite coexists in sympatry with another Perkinsus species, P. chesapeaki, which, as opposed to P. olseni, has not been directly associated to mortality events. Accurate detection and quantification of Perkinsus infections, even at low infection intensities, are crucial for monitoring clam population health and assessing risks associated with emerging diseases. In this study, we compared molecular methodologies based on duplex real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) in order to develop effective host resource management strategies. We first evaluated detection capabilities and the impact of potential inhibitors using both methodologies across varying DNA concentrations. Subsequently, we applied these methods to two contrasting French environments: Noirmoutier, characterized by low prevalence and infection intensity, and Arcachon Bay, which exhibits high prevalence and infection intensity. Our results demonstrate that dPCR should be prioritized for detecting and quantifying parasites at low infection intensities (10<sup>1</sup>-10<sup>2</sup> cp.µL<sup>-1</sup>), as it might minimize false-negative results compared to qPCR. Notably, dPCR provided new insights and revealed cryptic infections, demonstrating greater efficiency in detecting P. chesapeaki in lightly infected sites such as Noirmoutier. Conversely, infection intensity was underestimated with dPCR relative to qPCR for clams with moderate to high Perkinsus infection levels (10<sup>3</sup> cp.µL<sup>-1</sup> or higher), proving the latter more suitable for medium to heavily infected areas like Arcachon Bay. These findings are important as they represent the first in situ monitoring of both Perkinsus species using culture-free methodologies. This work provides essential tools for resource management and conservation strategies to address emerging diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16296,"journal":{"name":"Journal of invertebrate pathology","volume":" ","pages":"108417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital PCR (dPCR) vs. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) approaches for quantification of two Perkinsus species within clam tissue samples.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Chailler, Héliaz Le Bayon, Annabelle Dairain, Florentine Riquet, Leslie Stout, Aurélie Chambouvet, Morgan Smits\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jip.2025.108417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The parasite Perkinsus olseni (Perkinsea, Alveolata), the etiological agent of Perkinsosis, infects a wide range of bivalves and gastropods, including clams, particularly in Europe. This parasite coexists in sympatry with another Perkinsus species, P. chesapeaki, which, as opposed to P. olseni, has not been directly associated to mortality events. Accurate detection and quantification of Perkinsus infections, even at low infection intensities, are crucial for monitoring clam population health and assessing risks associated with emerging diseases. In this study, we compared molecular methodologies based on duplex real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) in order to develop effective host resource management strategies. We first evaluated detection capabilities and the impact of potential inhibitors using both methodologies across varying DNA concentrations. Subsequently, we applied these methods to two contrasting French environments: Noirmoutier, characterized by low prevalence and infection intensity, and Arcachon Bay, which exhibits high prevalence and infection intensity. Our results demonstrate that dPCR should be prioritized for detecting and quantifying parasites at low infection intensities (10<sup>1</sup>-10<sup>2</sup> cp.µL<sup>-1</sup>), as it might minimize false-negative results compared to qPCR. Notably, dPCR provided new insights and revealed cryptic infections, demonstrating greater efficiency in detecting P. chesapeaki in lightly infected sites such as Noirmoutier. Conversely, infection intensity was underestimated with dPCR relative to qPCR for clams with moderate to high Perkinsus infection levels (10<sup>3</sup> cp.µL<sup>-1</sup> or higher), proving the latter more suitable for medium to heavily infected areas like Arcachon Bay. These findings are important as they represent the first in situ monitoring of both Perkinsus species using culture-free methodologies. This work provides essential tools for resource management and conservation strategies to address emerging diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of invertebrate pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of invertebrate pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2025.108417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of invertebrate pathology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2025.108417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

珀金索斯奥尔塞尼(珀金索斯,肺泡)寄生虫是珀金索斯病的病原,广泛感染双壳类动物和腹足类动物,包括蛤蜊,特别是在欧洲。这种寄生虫与另一种珀金属物种P. chesapeaki共存,与P. olseni相反,P. chesapeaki与死亡事件没有直接关系。即使在低感染强度的情况下,准确检测和定量感染对监测蛤蜊种群健康和评估与新发疾病相关的风险至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了基于双工实时定量PCR (qPCR)和数字PCR (dPCR)的分子方法,以制定有效的宿主资源管理策略。我们首先使用两种方法在不同的DNA浓度下评估检测能力和潜在抑制剂的影响。随后,我们将这些方法应用于两个对比鲜明的法国环境:Noirmoutier,其特点是低患病率和感染强度,以及Arcachon Bay,其表现出高患病率和感染强度。我们的研究结果表明,dPCR应该优先用于检测和定量低感染强度(101-102 cp.µL-1)的寄生虫,因为与qPCR相比,它可以最大限度地减少假阴性结果。值得注意的是,dPCR提供了新的见解,揭示了隐性感染,在Noirmoutier等轻度感染地点检测P. chesapeaki的效率更高。相反,与qPCR相比,dPCR对中至高Perkinsus感染水平(103 cp.µL-1或更高)的蛤蜊的感染强度被低估,证明后者更适合于中至重度感染地区,如Arcachon Bay。这些发现很重要,因为它们代表了首次使用无培养方法对两种珀金索斯物种进行原位监测。这项工作为资源管理和保护战略提供了必要的工具,以应对新出现的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital PCR (dPCR) vs. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) approaches for quantification of two Perkinsus species within clam tissue samples.

The parasite Perkinsus olseni (Perkinsea, Alveolata), the etiological agent of Perkinsosis, infects a wide range of bivalves and gastropods, including clams, particularly in Europe. This parasite coexists in sympatry with another Perkinsus species, P. chesapeaki, which, as opposed to P. olseni, has not been directly associated to mortality events. Accurate detection and quantification of Perkinsus infections, even at low infection intensities, are crucial for monitoring clam population health and assessing risks associated with emerging diseases. In this study, we compared molecular methodologies based on duplex real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) in order to develop effective host resource management strategies. We first evaluated detection capabilities and the impact of potential inhibitors using both methodologies across varying DNA concentrations. Subsequently, we applied these methods to two contrasting French environments: Noirmoutier, characterized by low prevalence and infection intensity, and Arcachon Bay, which exhibits high prevalence and infection intensity. Our results demonstrate that dPCR should be prioritized for detecting and quantifying parasites at low infection intensities (101-102 cp.µL-1), as it might minimize false-negative results compared to qPCR. Notably, dPCR provided new insights and revealed cryptic infections, demonstrating greater efficiency in detecting P. chesapeaki in lightly infected sites such as Noirmoutier. Conversely, infection intensity was underestimated with dPCR relative to qPCR for clams with moderate to high Perkinsus infection levels (103 cp.µL-1 or higher), proving the latter more suitable for medium to heavily infected areas like Arcachon Bay. These findings are important as they represent the first in situ monitoring of both Perkinsus species using culture-free methodologies. This work provides essential tools for resource management and conservation strategies to address emerging diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
94
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invertebrate Pathology presents original research articles and notes on the induction and pathogenesis of diseases of invertebrates, including the suppression of diseases in beneficial species, and the use of diseases in controlling undesirable species. In addition, the journal publishes the results of physiological, morphological, genetic, immunological and ecological studies as related to the etiologic agents of diseases of invertebrates. The Journal of Invertebrate Pathology is the adopted journal of the Society for Invertebrate Pathology, and is available to SIP members at a special reduced price.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信