新型TLIF装置生物力学稳定性与减轻疼痛的比较分析。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2025.2520264
Shaolong Tang, Dan Pan, Siyuan Chen, Hengyuan Li, Zhaoming Ye
{"title":"新型TLIF装置生物力学稳定性与减轻疼痛的比较分析。","authors":"Shaolong Tang, Dan Pan, Siyuan Chen, Hengyuan Li, Zhaoming Ye","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2025.2520264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical performance of a new anti-backout TLIF device compared to a traditional device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved a rat model, with biomechanical tests including static axial compression, static and dynamic settlement, and blade-cutting torque tests. Pain behavior in rats (<i>n</i> = 6) and material compatibility through cell toxicity and hemolysis tests were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified anti-backout interbody fusion cage demonstrated a yield load of 7747.36 ± 274.96 N in static axial compression testing, significantly higher than the traditional TLIF cage's 6933.36 ± 65.00 N (<i>p</i> < 0.05), indicating superior load resistance. In static settlement testing, the modified cage's yield load was 1020.87 ± 13.22 N, also notably higher than the traditional cage's 939.06 ± 8.03 N (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In static pullout testing, the maximum pullout force of the modified cage with the blade extended reached 534.02 ± 21.24 N, exceeding the 476.97 ± 24.45 N without the blade (<i>p</i> < 0.05), showing advantages in maximum pullout force and stiffness. Biocompatibility tests revealed lower cytotoxicity and a hemolysis rate of less than 5% for the modified cage material, significantly better than the traditional material's 8% (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new anti-backout TLIF device provides enhanced stability, reduced pain, and improved material compatibility, supporting its potential for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2520264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Biomechanical Stability and Pain Reduction in Novel TLIF Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Shaolong Tang, Dan Pan, Siyuan Chen, Hengyuan Li, Zhaoming Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941939.2025.2520264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical performance of a new anti-backout TLIF device compared to a traditional device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved a rat model, with biomechanical tests including static axial compression, static and dynamic settlement, and blade-cutting torque tests. Pain behavior in rats (<i>n</i> = 6) and material compatibility through cell toxicity and hemolysis tests were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified anti-backout interbody fusion cage demonstrated a yield load of 7747.36 ± 274.96 N in static axial compression testing, significantly higher than the traditional TLIF cage's 6933.36 ± 65.00 N (<i>p</i> < 0.05), indicating superior load resistance. In static settlement testing, the modified cage's yield load was 1020.87 ± 13.22 N, also notably higher than the traditional cage's 939.06 ± 8.03 N (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In static pullout testing, the maximum pullout force of the modified cage with the blade extended reached 534.02 ± 21.24 N, exceeding the 476.97 ± 24.45 N without the blade (<i>p</i> < 0.05), showing advantages in maximum pullout force and stiffness. Biocompatibility tests revealed lower cytotoxicity and a hemolysis rate of less than 5% for the modified cage material, significantly better than the traditional material's 8% (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new anti-backout TLIF device provides enhanced stability, reduced pain, and improved material compatibility, supporting its potential for clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"2520264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2520264\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2520264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估一种新型的抗反退TLIF装置与传统装置的生物力学和临床性能。方法:采用大鼠模型进行生物力学试验,包括静轴压、静、动沉降和刀切扭矩试验。大鼠疼痛行为(n = 6)和材料相容性通过细胞毒性和溶血试验进行评估。结果:改进后的抗后援椎间融合器在静态轴压试验中屈服载荷为7747.36±274.96 N,显著高于传统TLIF椎间融合器的6933.36±65.00 N (p pp p)。结论:新型抗后援TLIF椎间融合器稳定性增强,疼痛减轻,材料相容性改善,具有临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Biomechanical Stability and Pain Reduction in Novel TLIF Devices.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical performance of a new anti-backout TLIF device compared to a traditional device.

Methods: This study involved a rat model, with biomechanical tests including static axial compression, static and dynamic settlement, and blade-cutting torque tests. Pain behavior in rats (n = 6) and material compatibility through cell toxicity and hemolysis tests were also assessed.

Results: The modified anti-backout interbody fusion cage demonstrated a yield load of 7747.36 ± 274.96 N in static axial compression testing, significantly higher than the traditional TLIF cage's 6933.36 ± 65.00 N (p < 0.05), indicating superior load resistance. In static settlement testing, the modified cage's yield load was 1020.87 ± 13.22 N, also notably higher than the traditional cage's 939.06 ± 8.03 N (p < 0.05). In static pullout testing, the maximum pullout force of the modified cage with the blade extended reached 534.02 ± 21.24 N, exceeding the 476.97 ± 24.45 N without the blade (p < 0.05), showing advantages in maximum pullout force and stiffness. Biocompatibility tests revealed lower cytotoxicity and a hemolysis rate of less than 5% for the modified cage material, significantly better than the traditional material's 8% (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The new anti-backout TLIF device provides enhanced stability, reduced pain, and improved material compatibility, supporting its potential for clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信