冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影预测未来心脏事件的高级分析:一项荟萃分析。

IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Emiliano Bianchini, Foziyah Alqahtani, Sara Alsubai, Paolo Alberto Del Sole, Hesham Elzomor, Ruth Sharif, John McCormick, Pruthvi Chenniganahosahalli Revaiah, Felicita Andreotti, Francesco Burzotta, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick Washington Serruys, Faisal Sharif
{"title":"冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影预测未来心脏事件的高级分析:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Emiliano Bianchini, Foziyah Alqahtani, Sara Alsubai, Paolo Alberto Del Sole, Hesham Elzomor, Ruth Sharif, John McCormick, Pruthvi Chenniganahosahalli Revaiah, Felicita Andreotti, Francesco Burzotta, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick Washington Serruys, Faisal Sharif","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is widely used for anatomical evaluation, its advanced analyses, including plaque characterization, computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), and radiomics signature extraction, hold promise for improved prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the added prognostic value of advanced coronary CTA-based analyses in predicting MACE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL identified studies reporting coronary CTA-based advanced analyses predicting MACE. The pooled HR of advanced coronary CTA-based analyses for the prediction of MACE was the primary outcome measure. The secondary endpoint included the mean difference in C index (ΔC index) between advanced coronary CTA-based predictive models and conventional models. MACE were defined according to study-level definitions. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024606545).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 75 studies, 52 were included in the primary analysis of HRs (n = 58,123) and 32 in the secondary analysis of ΔC index. The median follow-up time was 36 months (Q1-Q3: 24-57 months). Most advanced coronary CTA-based analyses, including CT-FFR, high-risk plaque, fat attenuation index, total plaque volume or low-attenuation plaque volume, and radiomics-derived scores, demonstrated a significant and consistent association with MACE, observed across both pooled unadjusted and adjusted HRs. In particular, CT-FFR (HR: 6.14 [95% CI: 3.75-10.05]; P < 0.01) and high-risk plaque (HR: 4.05 [95% CI: 3.16-5.18]; P < 0.01) showed the strongest associations with MACE despite a moderate to severe between-studies heterogeneity for most of the pooled analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced coronary CTA-based analyses show consistent association to the occurrence of MACE, suggesting their potential for refining cardiovascular risk stratification on top of conventional clinical risk assessment. Given the heterogeneity of advanced imaging analyses by coronary CTA and their varying pathophysiological targets, future comparative studies are needed to evaluate their implementation in different clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":14767,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Analyses of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Predict Future Cardiac Events: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Emiliano Bianchini, Foziyah Alqahtani, Sara Alsubai, Paolo Alberto Del Sole, Hesham Elzomor, Ruth Sharif, John McCormick, Pruthvi Chenniganahosahalli Revaiah, Felicita Andreotti, Francesco Burzotta, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick Washington Serruys, Faisal Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.05.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is widely used for anatomical evaluation, its advanced analyses, including plaque characterization, computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), and radiomics signature extraction, hold promise for improved prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the added prognostic value of advanced coronary CTA-based analyses in predicting MACE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL identified studies reporting coronary CTA-based advanced analyses predicting MACE. The pooled HR of advanced coronary CTA-based analyses for the prediction of MACE was the primary outcome measure. The secondary endpoint included the mean difference in C index (ΔC index) between advanced coronary CTA-based predictive models and conventional models. MACE were defined according to study-level definitions. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024606545).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 75 studies, 52 were included in the primary analysis of HRs (n = 58,123) and 32 in the secondary analysis of ΔC index. The median follow-up time was 36 months (Q1-Q3: 24-57 months). Most advanced coronary CTA-based analyses, including CT-FFR, high-risk plaque, fat attenuation index, total plaque volume or low-attenuation plaque volume, and radiomics-derived scores, demonstrated a significant and consistent association with MACE, observed across both pooled unadjusted and adjusted HRs. In particular, CT-FFR (HR: 6.14 [95% CI: 3.75-10.05]; P < 0.01) and high-risk plaque (HR: 4.05 [95% CI: 3.16-5.18]; P < 0.01) showed the strongest associations with MACE despite a moderate to severe between-studies heterogeneity for most of the pooled analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced coronary CTA-based analyses show consistent association to the occurrence of MACE, suggesting their potential for refining cardiovascular risk stratification on top of conventional clinical risk assessment. Given the heterogeneity of advanced imaging analyses by coronary CTA and their varying pathophysiological targets, future comparative studies are needed to evaluate their implementation in different clinical scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.05.017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.05.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管冠状动脉ct血管造影(CTA)被广泛用于解剖评估,但其先进的分析,包括斑块表征、CT-FFR和放射组学特征提取,有望改善主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测。目的:本荟萃分析的目的是评估晚期冠状动脉cta分析在预测MACE方面的附加预后价值。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和CENTRAL确认的报告冠脉cta高级分析预测MACE的研究。基于晚期冠状动脉cta分析预测MACE的总HR是主要的结局指标。次要终点包括基于cta的晚期冠状动脉预测模型与常规模型之间C指数(ΔC指数)的平均差异。MACE是根据研究级别定义定义的。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(CRD42024606545)中注册。结果:75项研究中,52项纳入hr的初步分析(n = 58,123), 32项纳入ΔC指数的二次分析。中位随访时间36个月(Q1-Q3: 24-57个月)。大多数先进的冠状动脉cta分析,包括CT-FFR、高危斑块、脂肪衰减指数、总斑块体积或低衰减斑块体积,以及放射组学衍生的评分,显示了与MACE的显著和一致的关联,在合并的未调整和调整的hr中都观察到。特别是CT-FFR (HR: 6.14 [95% CI: 3.75-10.05];P < 0.01)和高危斑块(HR: 4.05 [95% CI: 3.16-5.18];P < 0.01)显示与MACE最强的相关性,尽管大多数合并分析的研究间存在中度至重度异质性。结论:基于冠状动脉cta的先进分析显示与MACE的发生有一致的关联,这表明在传统临床风险评估的基础上,它们有可能完善心血管风险分层。鉴于冠状动脉CTA高级成像分析的异质性及其不同的病理生理目标,需要进一步的比较研究来评估其在不同临床情况下的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced Analyses of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Predict Future Cardiac Events: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Although coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is widely used for anatomical evaluation, its advanced analyses, including plaque characterization, computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), and radiomics signature extraction, hold promise for improved prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the added prognostic value of advanced coronary CTA-based analyses in predicting MACE.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL identified studies reporting coronary CTA-based advanced analyses predicting MACE. The pooled HR of advanced coronary CTA-based analyses for the prediction of MACE was the primary outcome measure. The secondary endpoint included the mean difference in C index (ΔC index) between advanced coronary CTA-based predictive models and conventional models. MACE were defined according to study-level definitions. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024606545).

Results: Of 75 studies, 52 were included in the primary analysis of HRs (n = 58,123) and 32 in the secondary analysis of ΔC index. The median follow-up time was 36 months (Q1-Q3: 24-57 months). Most advanced coronary CTA-based analyses, including CT-FFR, high-risk plaque, fat attenuation index, total plaque volume or low-attenuation plaque volume, and radiomics-derived scores, demonstrated a significant and consistent association with MACE, observed across both pooled unadjusted and adjusted HRs. In particular, CT-FFR (HR: 6.14 [95% CI: 3.75-10.05]; P < 0.01) and high-risk plaque (HR: 4.05 [95% CI: 3.16-5.18]; P < 0.01) showed the strongest associations with MACE despite a moderate to severe between-studies heterogeneity for most of the pooled analyses.

Conclusions: Advanced coronary CTA-based analyses show consistent association to the occurrence of MACE, suggesting their potential for refining cardiovascular risk stratification on top of conventional clinical risk assessment. Given the heterogeneity of advanced imaging analyses by coronary CTA and their varying pathophysiological targets, future comparative studies are needed to evaluate their implementation in different clinical scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, part of the prestigious Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family, offers readers a comprehensive perspective on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging. This specialist journal covers original clinical research on both non-invasive and invasive imaging techniques, including echocardiography, CT, CMR, nuclear, optical imaging, and cine-angiography. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging highlights advances in basic science and molecular imaging that are expected to significantly impact clinical practice in the next decade. This influence encompasses improvements in diagnostic performance, enhanced understanding of the pathogenetic basis of diseases, and advancements in therapy. In addition to cutting-edge research,the content of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging emphasizes practical aspects for the practicing cardiologist, including advocacy and practice management.The journal also features state-of-the-art reviews, ensuring a well-rounded and insightful resource for professionals in the field of cardiovascular imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信