经皮冠状动脉介入治疗不稳定心绞痛患者的定量血流比率与支架内再狭窄的关系。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Coronary artery disease Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001494
Dongchao Liu, Zheng Xue, Jingxian Qi, Liang Yin, Bing Duan, Bulang Gao, Jie Mi
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗不稳定心绞痛患者的定量血流比率与支架内再狭窄的关系。","authors":"Dongchao Liu, Zheng Xue, Jingxian Qi, Liang Yin, Bing Duan, Bulang Gao, Jie Mi","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) with in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with unstable angina.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients treated with PCI and follow-up for ISR were divided into a poor QFR group (QFR < 0.91) and a good QFR group with (QFR ≥ 0.91). All clinical data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 143 patients enrolled, 57 (39.9%) patients were in the poor QFR group and 86 (60.1%) in the good QFR group. After stenting, the stenosis was decreased to 0 from ≥80% before PCI. At 10-month follow-up, the incidence of ISR in the good QFR group was 6.9%, significantly lower than 33.9% in the poor QFR group (P < 0.05). QFR < 0.91 was a significant (P = 0.002) risk factor for ISR, 4.25 times that of patients with QFR ≥ 0.91. After adjusting for age and sex, the risk of developing ISR in patients with poor QFR was 4.51 times that in patients with good QFR [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-11.54, P = 0.002], and QFR < 0.91 (adjusted risk ratio: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.45-17.60, P < 0.001) and diabetes (adjusted risk ratio: 7.23, 95% CI: 2.81-18.60, P < 0.001) were two independent risk factors for ISR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A positive linear relationship exists between QFR and ISR after adjusting for age and sex, and poor QFR < 0.91 after PCI is a significant independent risk factor for ISR among unstable angina patients undergoing PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":"36 6","pages":"482-487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of quantitative flow ratio with in-stent restenosis in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Dongchao Liu, Zheng Xue, Jingxian Qi, Liang Yin, Bing Duan, Bulang Gao, Jie Mi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) with in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with unstable angina.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients treated with PCI and follow-up for ISR were divided into a poor QFR group (QFR < 0.91) and a good QFR group with (QFR ≥ 0.91). All clinical data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 143 patients enrolled, 57 (39.9%) patients were in the poor QFR group and 86 (60.1%) in the good QFR group. After stenting, the stenosis was decreased to 0 from ≥80% before PCI. At 10-month follow-up, the incidence of ISR in the good QFR group was 6.9%, significantly lower than 33.9% in the poor QFR group (P < 0.05). QFR < 0.91 was a significant (P = 0.002) risk factor for ISR, 4.25 times that of patients with QFR ≥ 0.91. After adjusting for age and sex, the risk of developing ISR in patients with poor QFR was 4.51 times that in patients with good QFR [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-11.54, P = 0.002], and QFR < 0.91 (adjusted risk ratio: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.45-17.60, P < 0.001) and diabetes (adjusted risk ratio: 7.23, 95% CI: 2.81-18.60, P < 0.001) were two independent risk factors for ISR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A positive linear relationship exists between QFR and ISR after adjusting for age and sex, and poor QFR < 0.91 after PCI is a significant independent risk factor for ISR among unstable angina patients undergoing PCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"482-487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不稳定型心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后定量血流比(QFR)与支架内再狭窄(ISR)的关系。材料与方法:将接受PCI治疗并随访的ISR患者分为QFR差组(QFR)。结果:143例患者中,QFR差组57例(39.9%),QFR好组86例(60.1%)。支架术后,狭窄从PCI前的≥80%降至0。随访10个月时,QFR良好组的ISR发生率为6.9%,显著低于QFR较差组的33.9% (P)。结论:经年龄、性别调整后,QFR与ISR之间存在正线性关系,QFR较差组存在正线性关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of quantitative flow ratio with in-stent restenosis in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Objective: To investigate the association of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) with in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with unstable angina.

Materials and methods: Patients treated with PCI and follow-up for ISR were divided into a poor QFR group (QFR < 0.91) and a good QFR group with (QFR ≥ 0.91). All clinical data were analyzed.

Results: Among 143 patients enrolled, 57 (39.9%) patients were in the poor QFR group and 86 (60.1%) in the good QFR group. After stenting, the stenosis was decreased to 0 from ≥80% before PCI. At 10-month follow-up, the incidence of ISR in the good QFR group was 6.9%, significantly lower than 33.9% in the poor QFR group (P < 0.05). QFR < 0.91 was a significant (P = 0.002) risk factor for ISR, 4.25 times that of patients with QFR ≥ 0.91. After adjusting for age and sex, the risk of developing ISR in patients with poor QFR was 4.51 times that in patients with good QFR [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-11.54, P = 0.002], and QFR < 0.91 (adjusted risk ratio: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.45-17.60, P < 0.001) and diabetes (adjusted risk ratio: 7.23, 95% CI: 2.81-18.60, P < 0.001) were two independent risk factors for ISR.

Conclusion: A positive linear relationship exists between QFR and ISR after adjusting for age and sex, and poor QFR < 0.91 after PCI is a significant independent risk factor for ISR among unstable angina patients undergoing PCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信