COVID-19疫苗对COVID-19后病情/长COVID的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Caroline Peine, Anna Stoliaroff-Pepin, Ulrich Reinacher, Katharina Heldt, Giselle Sarganas, Vanessa Piechotta, Agata Mikolajewska, Antonia Pilic, Nina Barkowski, Daniel Bleve, Marie H Giebeler, Susanne Poser, Livia Searle, Elisabeth Kißner, Leonie Nitsche, Fatimanur Bayram, Waldemar Siemens, Annika Ziegler, Jörg J Meerpohl, Frank Sandmann, Ole Wichmann, Thomas Harder
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗对COVID-19后病情/长COVID的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Caroline Peine, Anna Stoliaroff-Pepin, Ulrich Reinacher, Katharina Heldt, Giselle Sarganas, Vanessa Piechotta, Agata Mikolajewska, Antonia Pilic, Nina Barkowski, Daniel Bleve, Marie H Giebeler, Susanne Poser, Livia Searle, Elisabeth Kißner, Leonie Nitsche, Fatimanur Bayram, Waldemar Siemens, Annika Ziegler, Jörg J Meerpohl, Frank Sandmann, Ole Wichmann, Thomas Harder","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.07.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 can develop long-term symptoms known as postCOVID-19 condition (PCC; symptoms ≥3 months after infection) or long COVID (LC; symptoms ≥1 month after infection). Vaccination against COVID-19 might prevent PCC/LC, but the extent of protection is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the vaccine efficacy/effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines given prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection in preventing PCC or LC.</p><p><strong>Methods data sources: </strong>Studies were identified in Embase, MEDLINE, PreView, COVID-19 L.OVE repository, and Cochrane Library up to August 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: </strong>Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSI) that investigated immunization with a COVID-19 vaccine before SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible, irrespective of participant age and sex.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Risk of bias was assessed using the ''Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions'' tool.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>Primary outcome was PCC, secondary outcomes were LC, time until reconvalescence, limitations in everyday activity, and quality of life. Meta-analyses were primarily conducted using the random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6423 records were screened, and 65 NRSI reporting adjusted estimates were included, comprising >5.7 mio.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>VE for ≥1 vaccine dose against PCC was 41.0% (95% CI 27.8%; 51.7%; 22 NRSI, certainty of evidence: low). VE after 1, 2, or 3 doses versus unvaccinated was 19.1% (-119.4%; 70.2%, 3 NRSI), 43.2% (4.5%; 66.2%; 4 NRSI), and 70.0% (30.0%; 87.0%; 1 NRSI), respectively. In <18 years old, VE against PCC was 26% for ≥1 dose (-4%; 48%, 1 NRSI) and in >60 years old 41% (17%; 59%, 1 NRSI). VE after pre-Omicron-SARS-CoV-2 infection was 32.1% (-54.3%; 70.1%, 3 NRSI) and 20.9% (-10.1%; 43.3%, 2 NRSI) after Omicron infection. Sensitivity analyses indicated no influence of risk of bias and effect measure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccines may be moderately effective in preventing PCC/LC. VE may increase with the number of vaccine doses administered.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against post-COVID-19 condition/long COVID: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Peine, Anna Stoliaroff-Pepin, Ulrich Reinacher, Katharina Heldt, Giselle Sarganas, Vanessa Piechotta, Agata Mikolajewska, Antonia Pilic, Nina Barkowski, Daniel Bleve, Marie H Giebeler, Susanne Poser, Livia Searle, Elisabeth Kißner, Leonie Nitsche, Fatimanur Bayram, Waldemar Siemens, Annika Ziegler, Jörg J Meerpohl, Frank Sandmann, Ole Wichmann, Thomas Harder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.07.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 can develop long-term symptoms known as postCOVID-19 condition (PCC; symptoms ≥3 months after infection) or long COVID (LC; symptoms ≥1 month after infection). Vaccination against COVID-19 might prevent PCC/LC, but the extent of protection is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the vaccine efficacy/effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines given prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection in preventing PCC or LC.</p><p><strong>Methods data sources: </strong>Studies were identified in Embase, MEDLINE, PreView, COVID-19 L.OVE repository, and Cochrane Library up to August 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: </strong>Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSI) that investigated immunization with a COVID-19 vaccine before SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible, irrespective of participant age and sex.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Risk of bias was assessed using the ''Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions'' tool.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>Primary outcome was PCC, secondary outcomes were LC, time until reconvalescence, limitations in everyday activity, and quality of life. Meta-analyses were primarily conducted using the random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6423 records were screened, and 65 NRSI reporting adjusted estimates were included, comprising >5.7 mio.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>VE for ≥1 vaccine dose against PCC was 41.0% (95% CI 27.8%; 51.7%; 22 NRSI, certainty of evidence: low). VE after 1, 2, or 3 doses versus unvaccinated was 19.1% (-119.4%; 70.2%, 3 NRSI), 43.2% (4.5%; 66.2%; 4 NRSI), and 70.0% (30.0%; 87.0%; 1 NRSI), respectively. In <18 years old, VE against PCC was 26% for ≥1 dose (-4%; 48%, 1 NRSI) and in >60 years old 41% (17%; 59%, 1 NRSI). VE after pre-Omicron-SARS-CoV-2 infection was 32.1% (-54.3%; 70.1%, 3 NRSI) and 20.9% (-10.1%; 43.3%, 2 NRSI) after Omicron infection. Sensitivity analyses indicated no influence of risk of bias and effect measure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccines may be moderately effective in preventing PCC/LC. VE may increase with the number of vaccine doses administered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.07.026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.07.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:感染SARS-CoV-2的人可出现长期症状,称为covid -19后症状(PCC;感染后症状≥3个月)或长期covid (LC);感染后症状≥1个月)。针对COVID-19的疫苗接种可能会预防PCC/LC,但保护程度尚不清楚。目的:本系统评价的目的是评价在sars - cov -2感染前接种COVID-19疫苗预防PCC或LC的有效性(VE)。方法数据来源:在Embase、MEDLINE、PreView、COVID-19 L.OVE库和Cochrane Library中检索截至2024年8月1日的研究。研究资格标准、参与者、干预措施:随机对照试验(rct)和非随机干预研究(NRSI)在sars - cov -2感染前调查COVID-19疫苗免疫接种,无论参与者的年龄和性别如何,均符合条件。偏倚风险评估:使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。数据综合方法:主要终点为PCC,次要终点为LC、康复时间、日常活动受限和生活质量。meta分析主要采用随机效应模型。结果:筛选了6423条记录,纳入了65项非随机干预研究(NRSI),报告了调整后的估计值,其中包括1.57亿美元。受试者:≥一剂疫苗预防PCC的VE为41.0%(95%可信区间(CI) 27.8%;51.7%;22 NRSI,证据的确定性:低)。与未接种疫苗相比,接种一、二、三剂后的VE为19.1% (-119.4%;70.2%, 3个NRSI), 43.2% (4.5%;66.2%;4个NRSI)和70.0% (30.0%;87.0%;一个NRSI)。60岁的41% (17%;59%, 1例NRSI)。前omicron - sars - cov -2感染后VE为32.1% (-54.3%;70.1%,三个NRSI)和20.9% (-10.1%;43.3%, 2例NRSI)。敏感性分析显示不影响偏倚风险和效应测量。结论:COVID-19疫苗在预防PCC/LC方面可能具有中等效果。VE可能随着接种疫苗剂量的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against post-COVID-19 condition/long COVID: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 can develop long-term symptoms known as postCOVID-19 condition (PCC; symptoms ≥3 months after infection) or long COVID (LC; symptoms ≥1 month after infection). Vaccination against COVID-19 might prevent PCC/LC, but the extent of protection is unclear.

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the vaccine efficacy/effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines given prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection in preventing PCC or LC.

Methods data sources: Studies were identified in Embase, MEDLINE, PreView, COVID-19 L.OVE repository, and Cochrane Library up to August 1, 2024.

Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSI) that investigated immunization with a COVID-19 vaccine before SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible, irrespective of participant age and sex.

Assessment of risk of bias: Risk of bias was assessed using the ''Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions'' tool.

Methods of data synthesis: Primary outcome was PCC, secondary outcomes were LC, time until reconvalescence, limitations in everyday activity, and quality of life. Meta-analyses were primarily conducted using the random-effects model.

Results: A total of 6423 records were screened, and 65 NRSI reporting adjusted estimates were included, comprising >5.7 mio.

Participants: VE for ≥1 vaccine dose against PCC was 41.0% (95% CI 27.8%; 51.7%; 22 NRSI, certainty of evidence: low). VE after 1, 2, or 3 doses versus unvaccinated was 19.1% (-119.4%; 70.2%, 3 NRSI), 43.2% (4.5%; 66.2%; 4 NRSI), and 70.0% (30.0%; 87.0%; 1 NRSI), respectively. In <18 years old, VE against PCC was 26% for ≥1 dose (-4%; 48%, 1 NRSI) and in >60 years old 41% (17%; 59%, 1 NRSI). VE after pre-Omicron-SARS-CoV-2 infection was 32.1% (-54.3%; 70.1%, 3 NRSI) and 20.9% (-10.1%; 43.3%, 2 NRSI) after Omicron infection. Sensitivity analyses indicated no influence of risk of bias and effect measure.

Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines may be moderately effective in preventing PCC/LC. VE may increase with the number of vaccine doses administered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信