弥合长期COVID治疗的差距:一个小型综述。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Wassan Nori, Zina Abdullah Hussein, Roaa Mokram Hamed, Mufeed Taha, Alexandru Cosmin Pantazi
{"title":"弥合长期COVID治疗的差距:一个小型综述。","authors":"Wassan Nori, Zina Abdullah Hussein, Roaa Mokram Hamed, Mufeed Taha, Alexandru Cosmin Pantazi","doi":"10.2174/0109298673389691250709181809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long COVID-19 (LC) is a condition that follows SARS-CoV- -2, an acute infection defined by persistent fatigue, dyspnea, and impaired cognitive function. LC presents a complex array that imposes ongoing challenges on global health, patients' quality of life, and functional capacity. Many inconsistencies surround its pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. This review aims to cover missed gaps in LC with a special focus on therapeutic strategies concerning non-pharmacological, pharmacological, experimental, and innovative approaches for better patient management and outcomes, as well as to evaluate their effectiveness and guide future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online search was conducted using five digital repositories: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A combination of keywords associated with LC therapy was employed: \"long COVID, \"pharmacological options,\" \"non-pharmacological options,\" \"innovative strategies,\" \"experimental\", and\" quality of life (QOL).\" Relevant data were extracted and synthesized to categorize therapeutic approaches into subtypes. A critical analysis was conducted on their mechanism of action, indication, outcome, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled prevalence of LC was 42%, and the symptom duration ranged from 3 months to 2 years. The most important risk factors for LC were female sex, unvaccinated status, and cases with co-morbidities. Diagnosis of LC was challenging due to a lack of diagnostic standardization and reliable biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Non-pharmacological strategies were employed first, showing diverse efficacies; however, the reported literature was hindered by small sampling. Pharmacological agents show promising results but need further validation. Experimental and innovative strategies need longer studies and validations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC has imposed a significant burden on community health, necessitating the appropriate allocation of health resources and community support. Preventive and therapeutic interventions show promise, but the variability in patient response underscores the need for personalized approaches and more well-designed trials. Collaborative research and multi-disciplinary teams are needed to mitigate the long-term effects of LC and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10984,"journal":{"name":"Current medicinal chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Gaps in Long COVID Therapy: A Mini Review.\",\"authors\":\"Wassan Nori, Zina Abdullah Hussein, Roaa Mokram Hamed, Mufeed Taha, Alexandru Cosmin Pantazi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0109298673389691250709181809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long COVID-19 (LC) is a condition that follows SARS-CoV- -2, an acute infection defined by persistent fatigue, dyspnea, and impaired cognitive function. LC presents a complex array that imposes ongoing challenges on global health, patients' quality of life, and functional capacity. Many inconsistencies surround its pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. This review aims to cover missed gaps in LC with a special focus on therapeutic strategies concerning non-pharmacological, pharmacological, experimental, and innovative approaches for better patient management and outcomes, as well as to evaluate their effectiveness and guide future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online search was conducted using five digital repositories: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A combination of keywords associated with LC therapy was employed: \\\"long COVID, \\\"pharmacological options,\\\" \\\"non-pharmacological options,\\\" \\\"innovative strategies,\\\" \\\"experimental\\\", and\\\" quality of life (QOL).\\\" Relevant data were extracted and synthesized to categorize therapeutic approaches into subtypes. A critical analysis was conducted on their mechanism of action, indication, outcome, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled prevalence of LC was 42%, and the symptom duration ranged from 3 months to 2 years. The most important risk factors for LC were female sex, unvaccinated status, and cases with co-morbidities. Diagnosis of LC was challenging due to a lack of diagnostic standardization and reliable biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Non-pharmacological strategies were employed first, showing diverse efficacies; however, the reported literature was hindered by small sampling. Pharmacological agents show promising results but need further validation. Experimental and innovative strategies need longer studies and validations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC has imposed a significant burden on community health, necessitating the appropriate allocation of health resources and community support. Preventive and therapeutic interventions show promise, but the variability in patient response underscores the need for personalized approaches and more well-designed trials. Collaborative research and multi-disciplinary teams are needed to mitigate the long-term effects of LC and improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current medicinal chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current medicinal chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0109298673389691250709181809\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medicinal chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0109298673389691250709181809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期COVID-19 (LC)是SARS-CoV- 2之后的一种疾病,是一种急性感染,表现为持续疲劳、呼吸困难和认知功能受损。LC呈现出一系列复杂的问题,给全球健康、患者生活质量和功能能力带来持续的挑战。许多不一致围绕其病理生理,诊断,预防和治疗。本综述旨在弥补LC的空白,特别关注非药物、药物、实验和创新方法的治疗策略,以更好地管理患者和改善结果,并评估其有效性和指导未来的研究。方法:使用PubMed、Scopus、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science和Cochrane Library这五个数字资源库进行在线检索。与LC治疗相关的关键词组合使用:“长COVID”,“药物选择”,“非药物选择”,“创新策略”,“实验性”和“生活质量(QOL)”。提取并综合相关数据,将治疗方法分为不同的亚型。对其作用机制、适应症、结果和局限性进行了批判性分析。结果:LC的总患病率为42%,症状持续时间为3个月~ 2年。LC最重要的危险因素是女性、未接种疫苗和合并合并症。由于缺乏诊断标准化和可靠的生物标志物,LC的诊断具有挑战性。讨论:首先采用非药物策略,疗效多样;然而,报道的文献受到小样本的阻碍。药理制剂显示出有希望的结果,但需要进一步验证。实验性和创新性策略需要更长的研究和验证时间。结论:LC给社区卫生带来了巨大的负担,需要适当分配卫生资源和社区支持。预防和治疗干预显示出希望,但患者反应的可变性强调了个性化方法和更精心设计的试验的必要性。需要合作研究和多学科团队来减轻LC的长期影响并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging Gaps in Long COVID Therapy: A Mini Review.

Introduction: Long COVID-19 (LC) is a condition that follows SARS-CoV- -2, an acute infection defined by persistent fatigue, dyspnea, and impaired cognitive function. LC presents a complex array that imposes ongoing challenges on global health, patients' quality of life, and functional capacity. Many inconsistencies surround its pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. This review aims to cover missed gaps in LC with a special focus on therapeutic strategies concerning non-pharmacological, pharmacological, experimental, and innovative approaches for better patient management and outcomes, as well as to evaluate their effectiveness and guide future research.

Methods: An online search was conducted using five digital repositories: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A combination of keywords associated with LC therapy was employed: "long COVID, "pharmacological options," "non-pharmacological options," "innovative strategies," "experimental", and" quality of life (QOL)." Relevant data were extracted and synthesized to categorize therapeutic approaches into subtypes. A critical analysis was conducted on their mechanism of action, indication, outcome, and limitations.

Results: The pooled prevalence of LC was 42%, and the symptom duration ranged from 3 months to 2 years. The most important risk factors for LC were female sex, unvaccinated status, and cases with co-morbidities. Diagnosis of LC was challenging due to a lack of diagnostic standardization and reliable biomarkers.

Discussion: Non-pharmacological strategies were employed first, showing diverse efficacies; however, the reported literature was hindered by small sampling. Pharmacological agents show promising results but need further validation. Experimental and innovative strategies need longer studies and validations.

Conclusion: LC has imposed a significant burden on community health, necessitating the appropriate allocation of health resources and community support. Preventive and therapeutic interventions show promise, but the variability in patient response underscores the need for personalized approaches and more well-designed trials. Collaborative research and multi-disciplinary teams are needed to mitigate the long-term effects of LC and improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current medicinal chemistry
Current medicinal chemistry 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Current Medicinal Chemistry covers all the latest and outstanding developments in medicinal chemistry and rational drug design. Each issue contains a series of timely in-depth reviews and guest edited thematic issues written by leaders in the field covering a range of the current topics in medicinal chemistry. The journal also publishes reviews on recent patents. Current Medicinal Chemistry is an essential journal for every medicinal chemist who wishes to be kept informed and up-to-date with the latest and most important developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信