重症监护下不同臂围分类患者的生存预测。

IF 2.6 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Clinical nutrition ESPEN Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.1131
Jorge Z Silva-Filho, Jarson P Costa-Pereira, Ivan K S Zapanta, Evi C L Brasil, Rodrigo L S Silva, Flávia M Silva
{"title":"重症监护下不同臂围分类患者的生存预测。","authors":"Jorge Z Silva-Filho, Jarson P Costa-Pereira, Ivan K S Zapanta, Evi C L Brasil, Rodrigo L S Silva, Flávia M Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.1131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a simple anthropometric measure widely used as a marker of nutritional reserves, in the context of critical illness and other clinical conditions. Although MUAC can be classified using different approaches, few studies have investigated the prognostic value of these classifications in critically ill patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of different MUAC classifications approaches to predict survival among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a cohort study with prospective data collection. Adults of all ages admitted to a general ICU were included. MUAC was measured upon ICU admission and classified using four different approaches: two continuous and two categorical. Continuous measures included (1) absolute MUAC in centimeters (MUAC<sub>cm</sub>) and (2) MUAC adequacy percentage (MUAC%), calculated using the 50th percentiles from Frisancho. Categorical classifications were (3) MUAC% based on Blackburn & Thornton criteria, categorized as low (<90 %), adequate (90-110 %), and excess (>110 %), and (4) using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) cutoff, with low MUAC defined as <23.5 cm. Outcomes of interest were 28-day ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 426 patients were included (53.1 % male, median age: 64 years, interquartile range: 53 to 71). Metabolic disorders were the most common cause of ICU admission (49.5 %). Cox regression analysis using continuous variables showed that for each 1 cm decrease in MUAC, the risk of ICU mortality increased by 11 % (HR <sub>adjusted</sub> 1.11, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.20). Furthermore, for each 1 % decrease in MUAC, the risk of ICU mortality increased by 4 % (HR <sub>adjusted</sub> 1.04, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.06). Low MUAC according to the MUST classification was associated with a 3.73-fold increase in the hazard of 28-day ICU mortality and a 2.70-fold increase in the hazard of in-hospital mortality. No significant associations were observed using the Blackburn & Thornton classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a continuous variable, MUAC was an independent predictor of 28-day ICU mortality, but not of in-hospital mortality. In contrast, low MUAC classified according to the MUST criterion independently predicted both 28-day ICU and in-hospital mortality. No significant associations were observed using the Blackburn & Thornton classification. These findings highlight the prognostic utility of a simple anthropometric measure; however, they also suggest that different classification methods may yield distinct prognostic implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":"428-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival predictions of different arm circumference classifications in patients under intensive care.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Z Silva-Filho, Jarson P Costa-Pereira, Ivan K S Zapanta, Evi C L Brasil, Rodrigo L S Silva, Flávia M Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.1131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a simple anthropometric measure widely used as a marker of nutritional reserves, in the context of critical illness and other clinical conditions. Although MUAC can be classified using different approaches, few studies have investigated the prognostic value of these classifications in critically ill patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of different MUAC classifications approaches to predict survival among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a cohort study with prospective data collection. Adults of all ages admitted to a general ICU were included. MUAC was measured upon ICU admission and classified using four different approaches: two continuous and two categorical. Continuous measures included (1) absolute MUAC in centimeters (MUAC<sub>cm</sub>) and (2) MUAC adequacy percentage (MUAC%), calculated using the 50th percentiles from Frisancho. Categorical classifications were (3) MUAC% based on Blackburn & Thornton criteria, categorized as low (<90 %), adequate (90-110 %), and excess (>110 %), and (4) using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) cutoff, with low MUAC defined as <23.5 cm. Outcomes of interest were 28-day ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 426 patients were included (53.1 % male, median age: 64 years, interquartile range: 53 to 71). Metabolic disorders were the most common cause of ICU admission (49.5 %). Cox regression analysis using continuous variables showed that for each 1 cm decrease in MUAC, the risk of ICU mortality increased by 11 % (HR <sub>adjusted</sub> 1.11, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.20). Furthermore, for each 1 % decrease in MUAC, the risk of ICU mortality increased by 4 % (HR <sub>adjusted</sub> 1.04, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.06). Low MUAC according to the MUST classification was associated with a 3.73-fold increase in the hazard of 28-day ICU mortality and a 2.70-fold increase in the hazard of in-hospital mortality. No significant associations were observed using the Blackburn & Thornton classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a continuous variable, MUAC was an independent predictor of 28-day ICU mortality, but not of in-hospital mortality. In contrast, low MUAC classified according to the MUST criterion independently predicted both 28-day ICU and in-hospital mortality. No significant associations were observed using the Blackburn & Thornton classification. These findings highlight the prognostic utility of a simple anthropometric measure; however, they also suggest that different classification methods may yield distinct prognostic implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"428-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.1131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.1131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:中上臂围(MUAC)是一种简单的人体测量方法,在危重疾病和其他临床条件下被广泛用作营养储备的标记。尽管可以使用不同的方法对MUAC进行分类,但很少有研究调查这些分类在危重患者中的预后价值。在本研究中,我们旨在评估不同的MUAC分类方法预测重症监护病房(ICU)患者生存的能力。方法:这是一项前瞻性数据收集的队列研究的二次分析。所有年龄的成年人被纳入普通ICU。在ICU入院时测量MUAC,并使用四种不同的方法进行分类:两种连续方法和两种分类方法。连续测量包括(1)绝对MUAC厘米(MUACcm)和(2)MUAC充分率(MUAC%),使用Frisancho的第50百分位数计算。分类分为(3)基于Blackburn & Thornton标准的MUAC %,分类为低(110%),(4)使用营养不良通用筛查工具(MUST)截止值,低MUAC定义为结果:共纳入426例患者(53.1%男性,中位年龄:64岁,四分位数范围:53至71)。代谢性疾病是ICU住院最常见的原因(49.5%)。使用连续变量的Cox回归分析显示,MUAC每降低1 cm, ICU死亡风险增加11% (HR调整为1.11,95% CI 1.01 ~ 1.20)。此外,MUAC每降低1%,ICU死亡风险增加4% (HR调整为1.04,95% CI 1.01至1.06)。根据MUST分类,低MUAC与28天ICU死亡率风险增加3.73倍和住院死亡率风险增加2.70倍相关。使用布莱克本和桑顿分类没有观察到显著的关联。结论:作为一个连续变量,MUAC是28天ICU死亡率的独立预测因子,但不是院内死亡率的预测因子。相比之下,根据MUST标准分类的低MUAC独立预测28天ICU和住院死亡率。使用布莱克本和桑顿分类没有观察到显著的关联。这些发现强调了简单人体测量的预后效用;然而,他们也表明,不同的分类方法可能产生不同的预后影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival predictions of different arm circumference classifications in patients under intensive care.

Background & aims: Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a simple anthropometric measure widely used as a marker of nutritional reserves, in the context of critical illness and other clinical conditions. Although MUAC can be classified using different approaches, few studies have investigated the prognostic value of these classifications in critically ill patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of different MUAC classifications approaches to predict survival among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a cohort study with prospective data collection. Adults of all ages admitted to a general ICU were included. MUAC was measured upon ICU admission and classified using four different approaches: two continuous and two categorical. Continuous measures included (1) absolute MUAC in centimeters (MUACcm) and (2) MUAC adequacy percentage (MUAC%), calculated using the 50th percentiles from Frisancho. Categorical classifications were (3) MUAC% based on Blackburn & Thornton criteria, categorized as low (<90 %), adequate (90-110 %), and excess (>110 %), and (4) using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) cutoff, with low MUAC defined as <23.5 cm. Outcomes of interest were 28-day ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality.

Results: A total of 426 patients were included (53.1 % male, median age: 64 years, interquartile range: 53 to 71). Metabolic disorders were the most common cause of ICU admission (49.5 %). Cox regression analysis using continuous variables showed that for each 1 cm decrease in MUAC, the risk of ICU mortality increased by 11 % (HR adjusted 1.11, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.20). Furthermore, for each 1 % decrease in MUAC, the risk of ICU mortality increased by 4 % (HR adjusted 1.04, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.06). Low MUAC according to the MUST classification was associated with a 3.73-fold increase in the hazard of 28-day ICU mortality and a 2.70-fold increase in the hazard of in-hospital mortality. No significant associations were observed using the Blackburn & Thornton classification.

Conclusion: As a continuous variable, MUAC was an independent predictor of 28-day ICU mortality, but not of in-hospital mortality. In contrast, low MUAC classified according to the MUST criterion independently predicted both 28-day ICU and in-hospital mortality. No significant associations were observed using the Blackburn & Thornton classification. These findings highlight the prognostic utility of a simple anthropometric measure; however, they also suggest that different classification methods may yield distinct prognostic implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信