研究文章。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Javeria Khan, Muqadas Qureshi, Arif Rasheed, Syed Muhammad Yousuf Farooq
{"title":"研究文章。","authors":"Javeria Khan, Muqadas Qureshi, Arif Rasheed, Syed Muhammad Yousuf Farooq","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional analytical study, a total of 500 pregnant women were screened, out of which 223 women, aged 18 to 45 years, with a gestational age of 26-30 weeks in the third trimester, were enrolled. Prior to participation, all subjects provided written informed consent and were made aware of the potential risks and benefits associated with the procedure. Clinical and demographic data, including risk factors and medical history, were collected using a pre-designed data collection form. Gestational age was determined based on the last menstrual period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TAS and TVS measurements of cervical length were made on 229 pregnancies of 26-40 weeks gestation. Out of 223 patients, there were 102 females had lower abdominal pain there were 100 females had bleeding and 126 females had cephalic position and breech 97. at 223 women were initially enrolled in the study. Paired TAS and TVS measurements were obtained in 123 (51.3%) women. The mean TVS CL was 35.2 ± 6.8 mm, and the mean TAS CL was 34.7 ± 6.5 mm. Significant differences were identified between the mean CL measurements of the two techniques (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>both TAS and TVS are valuable tools for cervical length assessment, TVS should be considered the gold standard for more accurate and reliable measurements, especially in clinical settings where precise monitoring of cervical length is necessary.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>By providing a novel comparison between transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester, this study advances our understanding of how to optimize measuring methods for the reduction of preterm birth risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Article.\",\"authors\":\"Javeria Khan, Muqadas Qureshi, Arif Rasheed, Syed Muhammad Yousuf Farooq\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional analytical study, a total of 500 pregnant women were screened, out of which 223 women, aged 18 to 45 years, with a gestational age of 26-30 weeks in the third trimester, were enrolled. Prior to participation, all subjects provided written informed consent and were made aware of the potential risks and benefits associated with the procedure. Clinical and demographic data, including risk factors and medical history, were collected using a pre-designed data collection form. Gestational age was determined based on the last menstrual period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TAS and TVS measurements of cervical length were made on 229 pregnancies of 26-40 weeks gestation. Out of 223 patients, there were 102 females had lower abdominal pain there were 100 females had bleeding and 126 females had cephalic position and breech 97. at 223 women were initially enrolled in the study. Paired TAS and TVS measurements were obtained in 123 (51.3%) women. The mean TVS CL was 35.2 ± 6.8 mm, and the mean TAS CL was 34.7 ± 6.5 mm. Significant differences were identified between the mean CL measurements of the two techniques (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>both TAS and TVS are valuable tools for cervical length assessment, TVS should be considered the gold standard for more accurate and reliable measurements, especially in clinical settings where precise monitoring of cervical length is necessary.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>By providing a novel comparison between transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester, this study advances our understanding of how to optimize measuring methods for the reduction of preterm birth risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较经腹和经阴道超声对妊娠晚期宫颈长度的评价。方法:在这项横断面分析研究中,共筛选了500名孕妇,其中223名妇女,年龄在18至45岁之间,孕晚期胎龄为26-30周。在参与之前,所有受试者都提供了书面知情同意书,并被告知与该程序相关的潜在风险和益处。使用预先设计的数据收集表收集临床和人口数据,包括风险因素和病史。根据最后一次月经确定胎龄。结果:对229例妊娠期26 ~ 40周的孕妇进行了宫颈长度TAS和TVS测量。223例患者中,女性下腹疼痛102例,出血100例,头位126例,臀位97例。最初有223名女性参加了这项研究。123名(51.3%)女性获得TAS和TVS配对测量。TVS平均CL为35.2±6.8 mm, TAS平均CL为34.7±6.5 mm。结论:TAS和TVS都是评估颈椎长度的宝贵工具,TVS应被视为更准确可靠测量的金标准,特别是在临床需要精确监测颈椎长度的情况下。知识进展:通过对经阴道和经腹超声在妊娠晚期评估宫颈长度的新颖比较,本研究促进了我们对如何优化测量方法以降低早产风险的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research Article.

Objective: To compare transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study, a total of 500 pregnant women were screened, out of which 223 women, aged 18 to 45 years, with a gestational age of 26-30 weeks in the third trimester, were enrolled. Prior to participation, all subjects provided written informed consent and were made aware of the potential risks and benefits associated with the procedure. Clinical and demographic data, including risk factors and medical history, were collected using a pre-designed data collection form. Gestational age was determined based on the last menstrual period.

Results: TAS and TVS measurements of cervical length were made on 229 pregnancies of 26-40 weeks gestation. Out of 223 patients, there were 102 females had lower abdominal pain there were 100 females had bleeding and 126 females had cephalic position and breech 97. at 223 women were initially enrolled in the study. Paired TAS and TVS measurements were obtained in 123 (51.3%) women. The mean TVS CL was 35.2 ± 6.8 mm, and the mean TAS CL was 34.7 ± 6.5 mm. Significant differences were identified between the mean CL measurements of the two techniques (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: both TAS and TVS are valuable tools for cervical length assessment, TVS should be considered the gold standard for more accurate and reliable measurements, especially in clinical settings where precise monitoring of cervical length is necessary.

Advances in knowledge: By providing a novel comparison between transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester, this study advances our understanding of how to optimize measuring methods for the reduction of preterm birth risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信