J Ji, X Lin, D Pan, Z Wu, Z Xue, X Tian, S Zhang, B Wang, M Qiu
{"title":"【硬输尿管镜激光碎石联合n阱治疗输尿管最大直径≥1.5 cm结石的疗效观察】。","authors":"J Ji, X Lin, D Pan, Z Wu, Z Xue, X Tian, S Zhang, B Wang, M Qiu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap (RULL + N-trap), which is scoop-shaped, in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥ 1.5 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ureteral calculi who underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RULL) combined with N-Trap stone entrapment system at the Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, by the same surgical team between June 2021 and September 2024. A total of 364 patients were initially enrolled. After excluding 21 patients due to missing critical outcome variables, two distinct cohorts were established: 38 patients with ureteral stones measuring ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter, and 305 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter. To minimize selection bias and control for confounding variables, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. This resulted in two well-balanced groups: 31 patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter and 31 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter, matched on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes assessed between the two groups included stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included changes in renal function indicators, specifically serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and other factors like postoperative hospital stay and operative time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the matched cohort, the patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter had significantly longer operative time compared with those with smaller stones: (85.8±28.8) min <i>vs.</i> (62.4±24.6) min (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay showed no significant difference: (2.26±1.79) d <i>vs.</i> (2.03 ± 0.80) d (<i>P</i>>0.05). The stone clearance on postoperative day one was 90.3% in the study group <i>vs.</i> 100.0% in the control group (<i>P</i>>0.05). One month postoperatively, the stone clearance was 93.5% <i>vs.</i> 100.0%, respectively (<i>P</i>>0.05). Changes in SCr were (-6.58±16.10) μmol/L <i>vs</i>. (-13.70±12.50) μmol/L, and changes in GFR were (5.92±14.90) mL/(min·1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) <i>vs</i>. (7.47±11.20) mL/(min·1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for either renal function marker (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with N-trap is an optional method for treating ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥1.5 cm. The overall therapeutic efficacy is comparable, with the added benefit of significantly reducing the economic burden on patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"57 4","pages":"676-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter equal to or greater than 1.5 cm].\",\"authors\":\"J Ji, X Lin, D Pan, Z Wu, Z Xue, X Tian, S Zhang, B Wang, M Qiu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap (RULL + N-trap), which is scoop-shaped, in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥ 1.5 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ureteral calculi who underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RULL) combined with N-Trap stone entrapment system at the Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, by the same surgical team between June 2021 and September 2024. A total of 364 patients were initially enrolled. After excluding 21 patients due to missing critical outcome variables, two distinct cohorts were established: 38 patients with ureteral stones measuring ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter, and 305 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter. To minimize selection bias and control for confounding variables, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. This resulted in two well-balanced groups: 31 patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter and 31 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter, matched on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes assessed between the two groups included stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included changes in renal function indicators, specifically serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and other factors like postoperative hospital stay and operative time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the matched cohort, the patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter had significantly longer operative time compared with those with smaller stones: (85.8±28.8) min <i>vs.</i> (62.4±24.6) min (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay showed no significant difference: (2.26±1.79) d <i>vs.</i> (2.03 ± 0.80) d (<i>P</i>>0.05). The stone clearance on postoperative day one was 90.3% in the study group <i>vs.</i> 100.0% in the control group (<i>P</i>>0.05). One month postoperatively, the stone clearance was 93.5% <i>vs.</i> 100.0%, respectively (<i>P</i>>0.05). Changes in SCr were (-6.58±16.10) μmol/L <i>vs</i>. (-13.70±12.50) μmol/L, and changes in GFR were (5.92±14.90) mL/(min·1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) <i>vs</i>. (7.47±11.20) mL/(min·1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for either renal function marker (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with N-trap is an optional method for treating ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥1.5 cm. The overall therapeutic efficacy is comparable, with the added benefit of significantly reducing the economic burden on patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"676-683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330901/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter equal to or greater than 1.5 cm].
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap (RULL + N-trap), which is scoop-shaped, in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥ 1.5 cm.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ureteral calculi who underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RULL) combined with N-Trap stone entrapment system at the Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, by the same surgical team between June 2021 and September 2024. A total of 364 patients were initially enrolled. After excluding 21 patients due to missing critical outcome variables, two distinct cohorts were established: 38 patients with ureteral stones measuring ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter, and 305 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter. To minimize selection bias and control for confounding variables, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. This resulted in two well-balanced groups: 31 patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter and 31 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter, matched on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes assessed between the two groups included stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included changes in renal function indicators, specifically serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and other factors like postoperative hospital stay and operative time.
Results: In the matched cohort, the patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter had significantly longer operative time compared with those with smaller stones: (85.8±28.8) min vs. (62.4±24.6) min (P < 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay showed no significant difference: (2.26±1.79) d vs. (2.03 ± 0.80) d (P>0.05). The stone clearance on postoperative day one was 90.3% in the study group vs. 100.0% in the control group (P>0.05). One month postoperatively, the stone clearance was 93.5% vs. 100.0%, respectively (P>0.05). Changes in SCr were (-6.58±16.10) μmol/L vs. (-13.70±12.50) μmol/L, and changes in GFR were (5.92±14.90) mL/(min·1.73 m2) vs. (7.47±11.20) mL/(min·1.73 m2), with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for either renal function marker (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with N-trap is an optional method for treating ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥1.5 cm. The overall therapeutic efficacy is comparable, with the added benefit of significantly reducing the economic burden on patients.
期刊介绍:
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases.
The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.