预测双搭剪螺栓连接静力破坏的机器学习模型

IF 3.2 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
H. Almuhanna, G. Torelli, L. Susmel
{"title":"预测双搭剪螺栓连接静力破坏的机器学习模型","authors":"H. Almuhanna,&nbsp;G. Torelli,&nbsp;L. Susmel","doi":"10.1111/ffe.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the potential of machine learning models to predict the failure load and mode of double-lap shear bolted connections. Five algorithms were evaluated: adaptive boosting, artificial neural network, decision trees, support vector machines with radial basis function kernel, and k-nearest neighbors. A dataset comprising 221 experimental and numerical tests with varying input parameters, including different grades of stainless and carbon steel, was used to train the models. Unlike previous studies, the inclusion of diverse materials enabled the development of more generalizable models. To address data limitations, reduce biases associated with data split, and mitigate overfitting, k-fold cross-validation was adopted instead of the conventional 80/20 split. Results show that both regression and classification models achieved high coefficients of determination across most algorithms. Adaptive boosting delivered the most accurate failure load predictions, while artificial neural network achieved the highest accuracy in classifying failure modes. The findings highlight the potential of well-trained machine learning models to outperform traditional codified methods in accurately predicting the structural response of bolted connections, especially when trained on diverse datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12298,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","volume":"48 9","pages":"4041-4055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ffe.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Models to Predict the Static Failure of Double-Lap Shear Bolted Connections\",\"authors\":\"H. Almuhanna,&nbsp;G. Torelli,&nbsp;L. Susmel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ffe.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates the potential of machine learning models to predict the failure load and mode of double-lap shear bolted connections. Five algorithms were evaluated: adaptive boosting, artificial neural network, decision trees, support vector machines with radial basis function kernel, and k-nearest neighbors. A dataset comprising 221 experimental and numerical tests with varying input parameters, including different grades of stainless and carbon steel, was used to train the models. Unlike previous studies, the inclusion of diverse materials enabled the development of more generalizable models. To address data limitations, reduce biases associated with data split, and mitigate overfitting, k-fold cross-validation was adopted instead of the conventional 80/20 split. Results show that both regression and classification models achieved high coefficients of determination across most algorithms. Adaptive boosting delivered the most accurate failure load predictions, while artificial neural network achieved the highest accuracy in classifying failure modes. The findings highlight the potential of well-trained machine learning models to outperform traditional codified methods in accurately predicting the structural response of bolted connections, especially when trained on diverse datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"volume\":\"48 9\",\"pages\":\"4041-4055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ffe.70019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.70019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了机器学习模型在预测双搭接剪切螺栓连接的破坏载荷和模式方面的潜力。评估了五种算法:自适应增强、人工神经网络、决策树、径向基函数核支持向量机和k近邻。使用包含221个不同输入参数(包括不同等级的不锈钢和碳钢)的实验和数值测试的数据集来训练模型。与以前的研究不同,不同材料的纳入使更可推广的模型得以发展。为了解决数据限制,减少与数据分割相关的偏差,并减轻过拟合,采用k倍交叉验证而不是传统的80/20分割。结果表明,回归模型和分类模型在大多数算法中都获得了较高的决定系数。自适应增强对故障负荷的预测精度最高,而人工神经网络对故障模式的分类精度最高。研究结果表明,训练有素的机器学习模型在准确预测螺栓连接结构响应方面优于传统的编码方法,特别是在不同数据集上进行训练时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine Learning Models to Predict the Static Failure of Double-Lap Shear Bolted Connections

Machine Learning Models to Predict the Static Failure of Double-Lap Shear Bolted Connections

This study investigates the potential of machine learning models to predict the failure load and mode of double-lap shear bolted connections. Five algorithms were evaluated: adaptive boosting, artificial neural network, decision trees, support vector machines with radial basis function kernel, and k-nearest neighbors. A dataset comprising 221 experimental and numerical tests with varying input parameters, including different grades of stainless and carbon steel, was used to train the models. Unlike previous studies, the inclusion of diverse materials enabled the development of more generalizable models. To address data limitations, reduce biases associated with data split, and mitigate overfitting, k-fold cross-validation was adopted instead of the conventional 80/20 split. Results show that both regression and classification models achieved high coefficients of determination across most algorithms. Adaptive boosting delivered the most accurate failure load predictions, while artificial neural network achieved the highest accuracy in classifying failure modes. The findings highlight the potential of well-trained machine learning models to outperform traditional codified methods in accurately predicting the structural response of bolted connections, especially when trained on diverse datasets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
256
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS) encompasses the broad topic of structural integrity which is founded on the mechanics of fatigue and fracture, and is concerned with the reliability and effectiveness of various materials and structural components of any scale or geometry. The editors publish original contributions that will stimulate the intellectual innovation that generates elegant, effective and economic engineering designs. The journal is interdisciplinary and includes papers from scientists and engineers in the fields of materials science, mechanics, physics, chemistry, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信