从企业和工人调查中发现,远程工作对生产率和偏好的影响越来越大

IF 1.4 4区 管理学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Alexander Bartik, Zoë Cullen, Ed Glaeser, Michael Luca, Christopher Stanton
{"title":"从企业和工人调查中发现,远程工作对生产率和偏好的影响越来越大","authors":"Alexander Bartik,&nbsp;Zoë Cullen,&nbsp;Ed Glaeser,&nbsp;Michael Luca,&nbsp;Christopher Stanton","doi":"10.1111/jems.12616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Drawing on surveys of small business owners and employees, we present three main findings about the evolution of remote work after the onset of COVID-19. First, uptake of remote work was abrupt and widespread in jobs suitable for telework according to the task-based measure from Dingel and Neiman (2020). The initial adoption lead to a persistent shift in work arrangements that both firms and workers forecast would continue into the future. Second, business leaders' perceptions of how remote work affected productivity shifted over time. In early 2020, 70% of small business owners reported a productivity dip due to remote work. By contrast, the median business owner reported a positive productivity impact of remote work by 2021. Third, 21% of workers report being willing to accept a pay cut in excess of 10% if it allowed them to continue working from home, but the median worker in a teleworkable job would not tradeoff any compensation for the option of continued remote work. Taken together, our evidence points to perceived productivity gains and some workers' preferences as reasons for the persistence of remote work in the years following the onset of COVID-19.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","volume":"34 3","pages":"759-772"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rise of Remote Work Evidence on Productivity and Preferences From Firm and Worker Surveys\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Bartik,&nbsp;Zoë Cullen,&nbsp;Ed Glaeser,&nbsp;Michael Luca,&nbsp;Christopher Stanton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jems.12616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Drawing on surveys of small business owners and employees, we present three main findings about the evolution of remote work after the onset of COVID-19. First, uptake of remote work was abrupt and widespread in jobs suitable for telework according to the task-based measure from Dingel and Neiman (2020). The initial adoption lead to a persistent shift in work arrangements that both firms and workers forecast would continue into the future. Second, business leaders' perceptions of how remote work affected productivity shifted over time. In early 2020, 70% of small business owners reported a productivity dip due to remote work. By contrast, the median business owner reported a positive productivity impact of remote work by 2021. Third, 21% of workers report being willing to accept a pay cut in excess of 10% if it allowed them to continue working from home, but the median worker in a teleworkable job would not tradeoff any compensation for the option of continued remote work. Taken together, our evidence points to perceived productivity gains and some workers' preferences as reasons for the persistence of remote work in the years following the onset of COVID-19.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"759-772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jems.12616\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jems.12616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据对小企业主和员工的调查,我们提出了关于COVID-19爆发后远程工作演变的三个主要发现。首先,根据Dingel和Neiman(2020)的基于任务的测量,远程工作在适合远程工作的工作中是突然和广泛的。最初的采用导致了工作安排的持续变化,公司和工人都预测这种变化将持续到未来。其次,随着时间的推移,商业领袖对远程工作如何影响生产力的看法也在发生变化。2020年初,70%的小企业主表示,由于远程工作,生产率下降。相比之下,中位数的企业主表示,到2021年,远程工作将对生产率产生积极影响。第三,21%的员工表示,如果允许他们继续在家工作,他们愿意接受超过10%的减薪,但从事远程工作的中位数员工不会为了继续远程工作的选择而牺牲任何补偿。综上所述,我们的证据表明,在COVID-19爆发后的几年里,人们认为生产率的提高和一些员工的偏好是远程工作持续存在的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Rise of Remote Work Evidence on Productivity and Preferences From Firm and Worker Surveys

Drawing on surveys of small business owners and employees, we present three main findings about the evolution of remote work after the onset of COVID-19. First, uptake of remote work was abrupt and widespread in jobs suitable for telework according to the task-based measure from Dingel and Neiman (2020). The initial adoption lead to a persistent shift in work arrangements that both firms and workers forecast would continue into the future. Second, business leaders' perceptions of how remote work affected productivity shifted over time. In early 2020, 70% of small business owners reported a productivity dip due to remote work. By contrast, the median business owner reported a positive productivity impact of remote work by 2021. Third, 21% of workers report being willing to accept a pay cut in excess of 10% if it allowed them to continue working from home, but the median worker in a teleworkable job would not tradeoff any compensation for the option of continued remote work. Taken together, our evidence points to perceived productivity gains and some workers' preferences as reasons for the persistence of remote work in the years following the onset of COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信