P. Bhattarai, K. Khadka, P. L. Hatzenbuehler, A. T. Adjesiwor
{"title":"将秋种谷物覆盖作物与除草剂结合使用,以控制干食用豆类的杂草","authors":"P. Bhattarai, K. Khadka, P. L. Hatzenbuehler, A. T. Adjesiwor","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field experiments were conducted in Parma and Kimberly, ID, in 2023 and 2024 to determine weed suppression by fall-planted small grain cover crops in dry beans <i>(Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.). Cover crops included barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.), triticale (<i>Triticosecale wittmack</i> L.), and winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.), and these treatments were compared to a no-cover crop control. Cereal cover crops were either terminated chemically with glyphosate or harvested for forage. Herbicide treatments included pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides and a nontreated check. Based on cover crops, termination, and herbicide treatments, there were 35 treatments that were replicated four times. Haying treatments reduced dry bean population by 38% in Parma but had no significant impact on dry bean seed yield. Chemically terminated cover crop treatments reduced dry bean population in Kimberly by 37% and seed yield by up to 49%. Cover crops reduced weed biomass in dry beans by 65%–80% in Parma and 14%–54% in Kimberly at 8 weeks after dry bean planting. All herbicide treatments, except dimethenamid-p + <i>S</i>-ethyl-N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate, reduced weed biomass by 25%–75% in Parma and 33%–76% in Kimberly. The dry bean seed yield was reduced by 31% in Parma and 67%–72% in Kimberly in the nontreated check. Economic analysis indicated that all cover crop treatments were profitable, except for wheat in Parma and chemically terminated barley in Kimberly. There is promising potential for integrating cover crops and herbicides for effective weed management in dry beans.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70125","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating fall-planted cereal cover crops with herbicides for weed control in dry edible beans\",\"authors\":\"P. Bhattarai, K. Khadka, P. L. Hatzenbuehler, A. T. Adjesiwor\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Field experiments were conducted in Parma and Kimberly, ID, in 2023 and 2024 to determine weed suppression by fall-planted small grain cover crops in dry beans <i>(Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.). Cover crops included barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.), triticale (<i>Triticosecale wittmack</i> L.), and winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.), and these treatments were compared to a no-cover crop control. Cereal cover crops were either terminated chemically with glyphosate or harvested for forage. Herbicide treatments included pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides and a nontreated check. Based on cover crops, termination, and herbicide treatments, there were 35 treatments that were replicated four times. Haying treatments reduced dry bean population by 38% in Parma but had no significant impact on dry bean seed yield. Chemically terminated cover crop treatments reduced dry bean population in Kimberly by 37% and seed yield by up to 49%. Cover crops reduced weed biomass in dry beans by 65%–80% in Parma and 14%–54% in Kimberly at 8 weeks after dry bean planting. All herbicide treatments, except dimethenamid-p + <i>S</i>-ethyl-N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate, reduced weed biomass by 25%–75% in Parma and 33%–76% in Kimberly. The dry bean seed yield was reduced by 31% in Parma and 67%–72% in Kimberly in the nontreated check. Economic analysis indicated that all cover crop treatments were profitable, except for wheat in Parma and chemically terminated barley in Kimberly. There is promising potential for integrating cover crops and herbicides for effective weed management in dry beans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70125\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70125\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
于2023年和2024年在爱达荷州帕尔马和金伯利进行了田间试验,以确定秋种小粒覆盖作物对干豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)杂草的抑制作用。覆盖作物包括大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)、小黑麦(triticcoscale wittmack L.)和冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.),并将这些处理与无覆盖作物对照进行比较。谷物覆盖作物要么被草甘膦化学终止,要么被收获作为饲料。除草剂处理包括发芽前和发芽后的除草剂和未处理的检查。基于覆盖作物、终止和除草剂处理,有35种处理被重复了4次。海鹰处理使帕尔马干豆种群减少38%,但对干豆种子产量无显著影响。化学终止覆盖作物处理使金伯利的干豆数量减少了37%,种子产量减少了49%。在种植干豆8周后,覆盖作物使帕尔马和金伯利的干豆杂草生物量分别减少了65%-80%和14%-54%。除二甲胺-p + s -乙基- n, n -二丙基硫代氨基甲酸酯外,所有除草剂处理均使帕尔马的杂草生物量减少25% ~ 75%,金伯利减少33% ~ 76%。在未处理的对照中,帕尔马的干豆种子产量下降了31%,金伯利的干豆种子产量下降了67%-72%。经济分析表明,除帕尔马的小麦和金伯利的化学终止大麦外,所有覆盖作物处理都是有利可图的。利用覆盖作物和除草剂对干豆进行有效的杂草管理具有很大的潜力。
Integrating fall-planted cereal cover crops with herbicides for weed control in dry edible beans
Field experiments were conducted in Parma and Kimberly, ID, in 2023 and 2024 to determine weed suppression by fall-planted small grain cover crops in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Cover crops included barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), triticale (Triticosecale wittmack L.), and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and these treatments were compared to a no-cover crop control. Cereal cover crops were either terminated chemically with glyphosate or harvested for forage. Herbicide treatments included pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides and a nontreated check. Based on cover crops, termination, and herbicide treatments, there were 35 treatments that were replicated four times. Haying treatments reduced dry bean population by 38% in Parma but had no significant impact on dry bean seed yield. Chemically terminated cover crop treatments reduced dry bean population in Kimberly by 37% and seed yield by up to 49%. Cover crops reduced weed biomass in dry beans by 65%–80% in Parma and 14%–54% in Kimberly at 8 weeks after dry bean planting. All herbicide treatments, except dimethenamid-p + S-ethyl-N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate, reduced weed biomass by 25%–75% in Parma and 33%–76% in Kimberly. The dry bean seed yield was reduced by 31% in Parma and 67%–72% in Kimberly in the nontreated check. Economic analysis indicated that all cover crop treatments were profitable, except for wheat in Parma and chemically terminated barley in Kimberly. There is promising potential for integrating cover crops and herbicides for effective weed management in dry beans.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.