Nicholas E. Lim, Steven Abbott, Marilyn Zelesco, Christopher J. Welman
{"title":"横波弹性成像采集参数可能会影响横波速度测量","authors":"Nicholas E. Lim, Steven Abbott, Marilyn Zelesco, Christopher J. Welman","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the effects of acquisition parameters on measured shear wave velocity (SWV) in reference phantoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>SWV were measured on three phantoms of certified SWV 0.794 m/s (Phantom 1), 1.711 m/s (Phantom 2) and 2.500 m/s (Phantom 3). Parameters examined were depth, location, region of interest (ROI) size, transducer type, pitch, frame rate and one-shot mode. Measurements were repeated 10 times for different levels of each parameter at 1.8 MHz and 2.5 MHz transducer frequency on both Canon Aplio i700 and i800 systems. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed models with Holm test for multiple comparisons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was an interaction between acquisition depth and phantom stiffness (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with 1 cm of depth increasing SWV by 0.037 and 0.012 m/s in Phantoms 1 and 2 but decreasing SWV by −0.049 m/s in phantom 3. Lateral acquisition box location had increased SWV compared to the middle location (left 0.048 m/s, right 0.065 m/s, <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROI size (10 mm, 0.002 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.846) had no statistically significant effect on SWV. Transducer type at 2.5 cm depth had no significant effect on SWV (linear 0.038 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Diff pitch setting of 2 had lower SWV (−0.030 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Frame rate had no statistically significant effect on SWV (1 frame per second increasing SWV by 0.037 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.025). One-shot mode had higher SWV than continuous mode by 0.042 m/s (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Acquisition parameters can have statistically significant effects on measured SWV and may bias measured SWV due to cumulative effects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear Wave Elastography Acquisition Parameters May Bias Shear Wave Velocity Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas E. Lim, Steven Abbott, Marilyn Zelesco, Christopher J. Welman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajum.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine the effects of acquisition parameters on measured shear wave velocity (SWV) in reference phantoms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>SWV were measured on three phantoms of certified SWV 0.794 m/s (Phantom 1), 1.711 m/s (Phantom 2) and 2.500 m/s (Phantom 3). Parameters examined were depth, location, region of interest (ROI) size, transducer type, pitch, frame rate and one-shot mode. Measurements were repeated 10 times for different levels of each parameter at 1.8 MHz and 2.5 MHz transducer frequency on both Canon Aplio i700 and i800 systems. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed models with Holm test for multiple comparisons.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was an interaction between acquisition depth and phantom stiffness (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with 1 cm of depth increasing SWV by 0.037 and 0.012 m/s in Phantoms 1 and 2 but decreasing SWV by −0.049 m/s in phantom 3. Lateral acquisition box location had increased SWV compared to the middle location (left 0.048 m/s, right 0.065 m/s, <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROI size (10 mm, 0.002 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.846) had no statistically significant effect on SWV. Transducer type at 2.5 cm depth had no significant effect on SWV (linear 0.038 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Diff pitch setting of 2 had lower SWV (−0.030 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Frame rate had no statistically significant effect on SWV (1 frame per second increasing SWV by 0.037 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.025). One-shot mode had higher SWV than continuous mode by 0.042 m/s (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Acquisition parameters can have statistically significant effects on measured SWV and may bias measured SWV due to cumulative effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的研究不同采集参数对参考影中横波速度的影响。方法对三种经认证的SWV进行测量,分别为0.794 m/s (Phantom 1)、1.711 m/s (Phantom 2)和2.500 m/s (Phantom 3)。检测的参数包括深度、位置、感兴趣区域(ROI)大小、传感器类型、间距、帧率和一次拍摄模式。在佳能Aplio i700和i800系统上,在1.8 MHz和2.5 MHz换能器频率下,对每个参数的不同水平重复测量10次。采用线性混合模型进行统计分析,采用Holm检验进行多重比较。结果采集深度与幻像刚度之间存在交互作用(p < 0.001), 1 cm深度使幻像1和2的SWV分别增加0.037和0.012 m/s,使幻像3的SWV减少- 0.049 m/s。与中间位置相比,横向采集盒位置增加了SWV(左0.048 m/s,右0.065 m/s, p < 0.001)。ROI大小(10 mm, 0.002 m/s, p = 0.846)对SWV的影响无统计学意义。2.5 cm深度换能器类型对SWV无显著影响(线性0.038 m/s, p = 0.049)。差异音高设置2的SWV较低(- 0.030 m/s, p = 0.002)。帧率对SWV无显著影响(每秒1帧使SWV增加0.037 m/s, p = 0.025)。单次射击模式的SWV比连续模式高0.042 m/s (p < 0.001)。结论获取参数对测量的SWV有显著的影响,并可能由于累积效应而使测量的SWV产生偏差。
To determine the effects of acquisition parameters on measured shear wave velocity (SWV) in reference phantoms.
Methods
SWV were measured on three phantoms of certified SWV 0.794 m/s (Phantom 1), 1.711 m/s (Phantom 2) and 2.500 m/s (Phantom 3). Parameters examined were depth, location, region of interest (ROI) size, transducer type, pitch, frame rate and one-shot mode. Measurements were repeated 10 times for different levels of each parameter at 1.8 MHz and 2.5 MHz transducer frequency on both Canon Aplio i700 and i800 systems. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed models with Holm test for multiple comparisons.
Results
There was an interaction between acquisition depth and phantom stiffness (p < 0.001) with 1 cm of depth increasing SWV by 0.037 and 0.012 m/s in Phantoms 1 and 2 but decreasing SWV by −0.049 m/s in phantom 3. Lateral acquisition box location had increased SWV compared to the middle location (left 0.048 m/s, right 0.065 m/s, p < 0.001). ROI size (10 mm, 0.002 m/s, p = 0.846) had no statistically significant effect on SWV. Transducer type at 2.5 cm depth had no significant effect on SWV (linear 0.038 m/s, p = 0.049). Diff pitch setting of 2 had lower SWV (−0.030 m/s, p = 0.002). Frame rate had no statistically significant effect on SWV (1 frame per second increasing SWV by 0.037 m/s, p = 0.025). One-shot mode had higher SWV than continuous mode by 0.042 m/s (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Acquisition parameters can have statistically significant effects on measured SWV and may bias measured SWV due to cumulative effects.