荒漠草原降水-生产力关系:双不对称假说的检验

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70166
Scott L. Collins, Mariah T. Patton, Renée F. Brown
{"title":"荒漠草原降水-生产力关系:双不对称假说的检验","authors":"Scott L. Collins,&nbsp;Mariah T. Patton,&nbsp;Renée F. Brown","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the relationship between precipitation (PPT) and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) is essential for modeling the global carbon cycle. Across grassland to forest gradients, the PPT-ANPP relationship is well defined and nonlinear. Temporal patterns within a site over time are more variable and nearly always linear. Linear relationships, however, are inconsistent with positive asymmetry, where increases in ANPP during wet years exceed declines in dry years. The double asymmetry model predicts that concave-down nonlinearities will occur when extreme high and low PPT years are included in a time series. We tested this prediction using long-term observational ANPP data along with rainfall manipulation experiments. By combining observational records with experimental treatments, including drought, water addition, and nitrogen addition, we found some support for the double asymmetry model. However, the response under high precipitation coupled with nitrogen addition was concave-up, not down. By experimentally extending the range of monsoon precipitation, we found a weak but significant, nonlinear PPT-ANPP relationship, but only when nutrient limitation was alleviated. Our results demonstrate that multiple interacting factors govern the PPT-ANPP relationship within a site over time, challenging our ability to predict how ANPP will respond to changes in precipitation in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70166","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precipitation-productivity relationships in desert grassland: A test of the double asymmetry hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Scott L. Collins,&nbsp;Mariah T. Patton,&nbsp;Renée F. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecy.70166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Understanding the relationship between precipitation (PPT) and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) is essential for modeling the global carbon cycle. Across grassland to forest gradients, the PPT-ANPP relationship is well defined and nonlinear. Temporal patterns within a site over time are more variable and nearly always linear. Linear relationships, however, are inconsistent with positive asymmetry, where increases in ANPP during wet years exceed declines in dry years. The double asymmetry model predicts that concave-down nonlinearities will occur when extreme high and low PPT years are included in a time series. We tested this prediction using long-term observational ANPP data along with rainfall manipulation experiments. By combining observational records with experimental treatments, including drought, water addition, and nitrogen addition, we found some support for the double asymmetry model. However, the response under high precipitation coupled with nitrogen addition was concave-up, not down. By experimentally extending the range of monsoon precipitation, we found a weak but significant, nonlinear PPT-ANPP relationship, but only when nutrient limitation was alleviated. Our results demonstrate that multiple interacting factors govern the PPT-ANPP relationship within a site over time, challenging our ability to predict how ANPP will respond to changes in precipitation in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology\",\"volume\":\"106 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70166\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70166\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解降水(PPT)与地上净初级生产力(ANPP)之间的关系对于模拟全球碳循环至关重要。在草地到森林的梯度上,pp - anpp关系是明确的非线性关系。随着时间的推移,站点内的时间模式变化更大,几乎总是线性的。然而,线性关系与正不对称不一致,即湿润年ANPP的增加超过干旱年的下降。双不对称模型预测,当时间序列中包含极高和极低PPT年份时,将出现凹凸非线性。我们使用长期观测ANPP数据以及降雨操纵实验验证了这一预测。通过将观测记录与干旱、加水和加氮等试验处理相结合,我们发现了双不对称模型的一些支持。而在高降水加氮条件下,其响应呈凹形而非下降。通过实验扩大季风降水的范围,我们发现了微弱但显著的非线性PPT-ANPP关系,但只有在养分限制得到缓解的情况下。我们的研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,多个相互作用的因素控制着一个站点内pp -ANPP的关系,这对我们预测未来ANPP如何响应降水变化的能力提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Precipitation-productivity relationships in desert grassland: A test of the double asymmetry hypothesis

Precipitation-productivity relationships in desert grassland: A test of the double asymmetry hypothesis

Precipitation-productivity relationships in desert grassland: A test of the double asymmetry hypothesis

Precipitation-productivity relationships in desert grassland: A test of the double asymmetry hypothesis

Understanding the relationship between precipitation (PPT) and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) is essential for modeling the global carbon cycle. Across grassland to forest gradients, the PPT-ANPP relationship is well defined and nonlinear. Temporal patterns within a site over time are more variable and nearly always linear. Linear relationships, however, are inconsistent with positive asymmetry, where increases in ANPP during wet years exceed declines in dry years. The double asymmetry model predicts that concave-down nonlinearities will occur when extreme high and low PPT years are included in a time series. We tested this prediction using long-term observational ANPP data along with rainfall manipulation experiments. By combining observational records with experimental treatments, including drought, water addition, and nitrogen addition, we found some support for the double asymmetry model. However, the response under high precipitation coupled with nitrogen addition was concave-up, not down. By experimentally extending the range of monsoon precipitation, we found a weak but significant, nonlinear PPT-ANPP relationship, but only when nutrient limitation was alleviated. Our results demonstrate that multiple interacting factors govern the PPT-ANPP relationship within a site over time, challenging our ability to predict how ANPP will respond to changes in precipitation in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信