Joren M. Snoeks, Aranya Pathak-Broome, James G. Hagan, Bram Vanschoenwinkel
{"title":"陆地岛屿水生元群落生物多样性-生态系统功能(BEF)关系的大尺度变化","authors":"Joren M. Snoeks, Aranya Pathak-Broome, James G. Hagan, Bram Vanschoenwinkel","doi":"10.1111/geb.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Recent work has shown that the biodiversity of potential colonists in a landscape (the local species pool) may be more important for ecosystem functioning than the biodiversity in local habitat patches. However, it is unknown how such biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships may change across different biomes. To explore such patterns, nested insular ecosystems where variation in local biodiversity and local species pool biodiversity can be reliably quantified can provide important insights.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Rock pool metacommunities on isolated rocky outcrops (i.e., inselbergs) in Africa, Australia, Europe, and North America.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Sampling: 2011–2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Freshwater invertebrates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We assembled a large-scale dataset of invertebrate metacommunities from replicated rock pool clusters on inselbergs as a model system to test the ability of local biodiversity and local species pool biodiversity to explain community biomass in organisms with different survival strategies (active or passive dispersers). To test our hypotheses, we used a combination of directed acrylic graph-based path analyses and general linear mixed-effects models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The biodiversity of the local species pool was influenced by climate but did not significantly impact community biomass. Instead, local environmental gradients seem to override any species pool effects on community biomass. However, in line with expectations, the relationship between local biodiversity and biomass varied across inselbergs. Contrary to expectations, inselberg prominence did not influence the BEF slope. However, in drier conditions, the BEF relationship weakened for active dispersers, likely reflecting environmental limits on recolonisation. Thus, climate and dispersal strategy jointly shaped how biodiversity influenced community biomass.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study illustrates that even in a simple ecosystem there can be substantial geographical variation in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning that may be partially explained by environmental conditions and by the survival strategy of the organisms considered.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large-Scale Variation in Biodiversity–Ecosystem Functioning (BEF) Relationships in Aquatic Metacommunities on Terrestrial Islands\",\"authors\":\"Joren M. Snoeks, Aranya Pathak-Broome, James G. Hagan, Bram Vanschoenwinkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Recent work has shown that the biodiversity of potential colonists in a landscape (the local species pool) may be more important for ecosystem functioning than the biodiversity in local habitat patches. However, it is unknown how such biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships may change across different biomes. To explore such patterns, nested insular ecosystems where variation in local biodiversity and local species pool biodiversity can be reliably quantified can provide important insights.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rock pool metacommunities on isolated rocky outcrops (i.e., inselbergs) in Africa, Australia, Europe, and North America.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sampling: 2011–2019.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Freshwater invertebrates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We assembled a large-scale dataset of invertebrate metacommunities from replicated rock pool clusters on inselbergs as a model system to test the ability of local biodiversity and local species pool biodiversity to explain community biomass in organisms with different survival strategies (active or passive dispersers). To test our hypotheses, we used a combination of directed acrylic graph-based path analyses and general linear mixed-effects models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The biodiversity of the local species pool was influenced by climate but did not significantly impact community biomass. Instead, local environmental gradients seem to override any species pool effects on community biomass. However, in line with expectations, the relationship between local biodiversity and biomass varied across inselbergs. Contrary to expectations, inselberg prominence did not influence the BEF slope. However, in drier conditions, the BEF relationship weakened for active dispersers, likely reflecting environmental limits on recolonisation. Thus, climate and dispersal strategy jointly shaped how biodiversity influenced community biomass.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study illustrates that even in a simple ecosystem there can be substantial geographical variation in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning that may be partially explained by environmental conditions and by the survival strategy of the organisms considered.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70100\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70100","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Large-Scale Variation in Biodiversity–Ecosystem Functioning (BEF) Relationships in Aquatic Metacommunities on Terrestrial Islands
Aim
Recent work has shown that the biodiversity of potential colonists in a landscape (the local species pool) may be more important for ecosystem functioning than the biodiversity in local habitat patches. However, it is unknown how such biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships may change across different biomes. To explore such patterns, nested insular ecosystems where variation in local biodiversity and local species pool biodiversity can be reliably quantified can provide important insights.
Location
Rock pool metacommunities on isolated rocky outcrops (i.e., inselbergs) in Africa, Australia, Europe, and North America.
Time Period
Sampling: 2011–2019.
Major Taxa Studied
Freshwater invertebrates.
Methods
We assembled a large-scale dataset of invertebrate metacommunities from replicated rock pool clusters on inselbergs as a model system to test the ability of local biodiversity and local species pool biodiversity to explain community biomass in organisms with different survival strategies (active or passive dispersers). To test our hypotheses, we used a combination of directed acrylic graph-based path analyses and general linear mixed-effects models.
Results
The biodiversity of the local species pool was influenced by climate but did not significantly impact community biomass. Instead, local environmental gradients seem to override any species pool effects on community biomass. However, in line with expectations, the relationship between local biodiversity and biomass varied across inselbergs. Contrary to expectations, inselberg prominence did not influence the BEF slope. However, in drier conditions, the BEF relationship weakened for active dispersers, likely reflecting environmental limits on recolonisation. Thus, climate and dispersal strategy jointly shaped how biodiversity influenced community biomass.
Main Conclusion
This study illustrates that even in a simple ecosystem there can be substantial geographical variation in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning that may be partially explained by environmental conditions and by the survival strategy of the organisms considered.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.