Zheng Li , Jingjing Zeng , David A. Hensher , Chenyang Wu
{"title":"出行时间可靠性、心理选择机制、可持续交通决策与智慧城市发展","authors":"Zheng Li , Jingjing Zeng , David A. Hensher , Chenyang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing land use-transportation interaction (LUTI) models largely overlooked important choice mechanisms that shape travel decision making under uncertainty, such as risk attitude and ambiguity attitude. Within a LUTI model, this study embeds a behavioral framework which accommodates the two behavioral elements into a spatial general equilibrium model. In this improved LUTI model, endogenous commuting costs are influenced by commuters’ choice behaviors in the presence of travel time variability inherent in transport systems, and, more importantly, choice outcomes are jointly determined by their taste preferences and ambiguity/risk attitudes. We then apply the model system to an Australian city, where our baseline results, compared to a conventional model that omits risk and ambiguity attitudes, align closely with observed market evidence. This alignment reinforces the validity of our behaviorally realistic modeling approach. Furthermore, simulations of improved travel time reliability reveal the potential to smart development by promoting sustainable travel and urban growth. Our findings underscore the critical role of psychological choice mechanisms in deepening the understanding of travel behavior dynamics and land use patterns. Based on the study evidence, we offer both case-specific suggestions and broader policy implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104624"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Travel time reliability, psychological choice mechanisms, sustainable transport decisions and smart urban development\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Li , Jingjing Zeng , David A. Hensher , Chenyang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Existing land use-transportation interaction (LUTI) models largely overlooked important choice mechanisms that shape travel decision making under uncertainty, such as risk attitude and ambiguity attitude. Within a LUTI model, this study embeds a behavioral framework which accommodates the two behavioral elements into a spatial general equilibrium model. In this improved LUTI model, endogenous commuting costs are influenced by commuters’ choice behaviors in the presence of travel time variability inherent in transport systems, and, more importantly, choice outcomes are jointly determined by their taste preferences and ambiguity/risk attitudes. We then apply the model system to an Australian city, where our baseline results, compared to a conventional model that omits risk and ambiguity attitudes, align closely with observed market evidence. This alignment reinforces the validity of our behaviorally realistic modeling approach. Furthermore, simulations of improved travel time reliability reveal the potential to smart development by promoting sustainable travel and urban growth. Our findings underscore the critical role of psychological choice mechanisms in deepening the understanding of travel behavior dynamics and land use patterns. Based on the study evidence, we offer both case-specific suggestions and broader policy implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002526\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002526","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Travel time reliability, psychological choice mechanisms, sustainable transport decisions and smart urban development
Existing land use-transportation interaction (LUTI) models largely overlooked important choice mechanisms that shape travel decision making under uncertainty, such as risk attitude and ambiguity attitude. Within a LUTI model, this study embeds a behavioral framework which accommodates the two behavioral elements into a spatial general equilibrium model. In this improved LUTI model, endogenous commuting costs are influenced by commuters’ choice behaviors in the presence of travel time variability inherent in transport systems, and, more importantly, choice outcomes are jointly determined by their taste preferences and ambiguity/risk attitudes. We then apply the model system to an Australian city, where our baseline results, compared to a conventional model that omits risk and ambiguity attitudes, align closely with observed market evidence. This alignment reinforces the validity of our behaviorally realistic modeling approach. Furthermore, simulations of improved travel time reliability reveal the potential to smart development by promoting sustainable travel and urban growth. Our findings underscore the critical role of psychological choice mechanisms in deepening the understanding of travel behavior dynamics and land use patterns. Based on the study evidence, we offer both case-specific suggestions and broader policy implications.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.