重新思考电力需求侧响应：意大利住宅灵活性挑战的相关方法

IF 4.4 3区经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS

Utilities Policy Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2025.102019

Aurore Dudka

{"title":"重新思考电力需求侧响应：意大利住宅灵活性挑战的相关方法","authors":"Aurore Dudka","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential electricity demand-side response remains a challenge when driven by market approaches. In contrast, some actors are advancing relational models that link flexibility to consumer-centric logics and broader social goals, with promising engagement results. In Italy, historically low consumer involvement poses barriers to adopting such models and hinders the development of a flexibility market. Based on qualitative analysis, this study examines how various institutional actors involved in experimental DSR projects reframe citizen engagement through more socially grounded approaches. Policy implications include recognising energy data access as a right, auditing contracted grid capacity, and fostering collaborative governance frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102019"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking electricity demand-side response: Relational approaches to the challenge of residential flexibility in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Aurore Dudka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Residential electricity demand-side response remains a challenge when driven by market approaches. In contrast, some actors are advancing relational models that link flexibility to consumer-centric logics and broader social goals, with promising engagement results. In Italy, historically low consumer involvement poses barriers to adopting such models and hinders the development of a flexibility market. Based on qualitative analysis, this study examines how various institutional actors involved in experimental DSR projects reframe citizen engagement through more socially grounded approaches. Policy implications include recognising energy data access as a right, auditing contracted grid capacity, and fostering collaborative governance frameworks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在市场方法的驱动下，住宅电力需求侧响应仍然是一个挑战。相比之下，一些参与者正在推进关系模型，将灵活性与以消费者为中心的逻辑和更广泛的社会目标联系起来，并带来了有希望的参与结果。在意大利，消费者参与度历来较低，这对采用这种模式构成了障碍，并阻碍了灵活性市场的发展。在定性分析的基础上，本研究考察了参与实验性DSR项目的各种机构参与者如何通过更基于社会的方法重塑公民参与。政策影响包括承认能源数据访问是一项权利，审计合同电网容量，以及促进协作治理框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Rethinking electricity demand-side response: Relational approaches to the challenge of residential flexibility in Italy

Residential electricity demand-side response remains a challenge when driven by market approaches. In contrast, some actors are advancing relational models that link flexibility to consumer-centric logics and broader social goals, with promising engagement results. In Italy, historically low consumer involvement poses barriers to adopting such models and hinders the development of a flexibility market. Based on qualitative analysis, this study examines how various institutional actors involved in experimental DSR projects reframe citizen engagement through more socially grounded approaches. Policy implications include recognising energy data access as a right, auditing contracted grid capacity, and fostering collaborative governance frameworks.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

66 days

期刊介绍： Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.