颈椎亚轴位手术对颈椎和全椎矢状位排列的影响。一项前瞻性观察研究

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M. Bolcha , J. Lodin , D. Cihlář , M. Sameš , P. Vachata
{"title":"颈椎亚轴位手术对颈椎和全椎矢状位排列的影响。一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"M. Bolcha ,&nbsp;J. Lodin ,&nbsp;D. Cihlář ,&nbsp;M. Sameš ,&nbsp;P. Vachata","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sagittal balance is essential for posture, horizontal gaze and avoiding overloading the posterior segment of the spine.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Does single- or double-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) alter (1) cervical and global sagittal parameters and (2) outcomes in patients with kyphotic versus non-kyphotic alignment?</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>In a prospective cohort, 103 adults underwent 1–2-level ACDF. Standing radiographs were obtained pre-operatively and 24 months post-operatively. Analysed were six cervical parameters, thoracolumbar curves and spinopelvic angles. Pain was rated on a Visual analogue scale and disability with the Neck Disability Index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Kyphotic spines (n = 43) converted to lordosis (median ΔC2–C7 Cobb = +6.4°, CI 95 % 3,84-10,9) with concomitant reductions in C2–C7 SVA and rise in T1 slope (all p &lt; 0.05); thoracolumbar and pelvic parameters were unchanged. Non-kyphotic spines (n = 60) showed no significant radiographic shifts. Both groups clinically improved: Kyphotic group VAS neck −2, VAS Arm −4 (p = 0,00037), non-kyphotic group VAS neck −3, VAS arm −3 (p = 0,00001) and clinical gains were independent of lordotisation magnitude. In the kyphotic group, the significant importance of the T1S-CL parameter was found. No reoperations, adjacent-segment disease or serious complications occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>Single-/double-level ACDF affect local sagittal paramethers, correct kyphosis and modulates the cervicothoracic junction, but does not influence distal spinal or pelvic alignment. Pain relief and functional improvement are comparable in kyphotic and non-kyphotic patients, irrespective of relordotization magnitude. Patients may not require aggressive lordosis correction, based on their individual sagittal profiles. Nonetheless, these results and conclusions are limited to single-/double-level ACDFs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of subaxial cervical spine surgery on the sagittal alignment of the cervical and global spine. A prospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"M. Bolcha ,&nbsp;J. Lodin ,&nbsp;D. Cihlář ,&nbsp;M. Sameš ,&nbsp;P. Vachata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sagittal balance is essential for posture, horizontal gaze and avoiding overloading the posterior segment of the spine.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Does single- or double-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) alter (1) cervical and global sagittal parameters and (2) outcomes in patients with kyphotic versus non-kyphotic alignment?</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>In a prospective cohort, 103 adults underwent 1–2-level ACDF. Standing radiographs were obtained pre-operatively and 24 months post-operatively. Analysed were six cervical parameters, thoracolumbar curves and spinopelvic angles. Pain was rated on a Visual analogue scale and disability with the Neck Disability Index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Kyphotic spines (n = 43) converted to lordosis (median ΔC2–C7 Cobb = +6.4°, CI 95 % 3,84-10,9) with concomitant reductions in C2–C7 SVA and rise in T1 slope (all p &lt; 0.05); thoracolumbar and pelvic parameters were unchanged. Non-kyphotic spines (n = 60) showed no significant radiographic shifts. Both groups clinically improved: Kyphotic group VAS neck −2, VAS Arm −4 (p = 0,00037), non-kyphotic group VAS neck −3, VAS arm −3 (p = 0,00001) and clinical gains were independent of lordotisation magnitude. In the kyphotic group, the significant importance of the T1S-CL parameter was found. No reoperations, adjacent-segment disease or serious complications occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>Single-/double-level ACDF affect local sagittal paramethers, correct kyphosis and modulates the cervicothoracic junction, but does not influence distal spinal or pelvic alignment. Pain relief and functional improvement are comparable in kyphotic and non-kyphotic patients, irrespective of relordotization magnitude. Patients may not require aggressive lordosis correction, based on their individual sagittal profiles. Nonetheless, these results and conclusions are limited to single-/double-level ACDFs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425001924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425001924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

矢状面平衡对姿势、水平凝视和避免脊柱后段负荷过重至关重要。研究问题:单节段或双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)是否会改变(1)颈椎和整体矢状面参数以及(2)后凸与非后凸对齐患者的预后?材料和方法在一项前瞻性队列研究中,103名成人接受了1 - 2级ACDF。术前和术后24个月的站立x线片。分析了6项颈椎参数、胸腰椎曲线和脊柱骨盆角。疼痛以视觉模拟量表和颈部残疾指数评定。结果前凸脊柱(n = 43)转化为前凸(中位ΔC2-C7 Cobb = +6.4°,CI 95% 3,84-10,9),伴有C2-C7 SVA降低和T1斜率升高(均p <;0.05);胸腰椎和骨盆参数不变。非后凸脊柱(n = 60)没有明显的影像学改变。两组均有临床改善:后凸组VAS颈- 2,VAS臂- 4 (p = 0,00037),非后凸组VAS颈- 3,VAS臂- 3 (p = 0,00001),临床获益与脊柱前凸程度无关。后凸组T1S-CL参数具有显著性意义。无再手术、邻近节段病变及严重并发症发生。讨论与结论单/双水平ACDF影响局部矢状面参数,纠正后凸和调节颈胸交界处,但不影响远端脊柱或骨盆对齐。疼痛缓解和功能改善在后凸和非后凸患者中具有可比性,无论再放松程度如何。患者可能不需要积极的前凸矫正,基于他们个人的矢状面。然而,这些结果和结论仅限于单/双水平ACDFs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of subaxial cervical spine surgery on the sagittal alignment of the cervical and global spine. A prospective observational study

Influence of subaxial cervical spine surgery on the sagittal alignment of the cervical and global spine. A prospective observational study

Introduction

Sagittal balance is essential for posture, horizontal gaze and avoiding overloading the posterior segment of the spine.

Research question

Does single- or double-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) alter (1) cervical and global sagittal parameters and (2) outcomes in patients with kyphotic versus non-kyphotic alignment?

Material and methods

In a prospective cohort, 103 adults underwent 1–2-level ACDF. Standing radiographs were obtained pre-operatively and 24 months post-operatively. Analysed were six cervical parameters, thoracolumbar curves and spinopelvic angles. Pain was rated on a Visual analogue scale and disability with the Neck Disability Index.

Results

Kyphotic spines (n = 43) converted to lordosis (median ΔC2–C7 Cobb = +6.4°, CI 95 % 3,84-10,9) with concomitant reductions in C2–C7 SVA and rise in T1 slope (all p < 0.05); thoracolumbar and pelvic parameters were unchanged. Non-kyphotic spines (n = 60) showed no significant radiographic shifts. Both groups clinically improved: Kyphotic group VAS neck −2, VAS Arm −4 (p = 0,00037), non-kyphotic group VAS neck −3, VAS arm −3 (p = 0,00001) and clinical gains were independent of lordotisation magnitude. In the kyphotic group, the significant importance of the T1S-CL parameter was found. No reoperations, adjacent-segment disease or serious complications occurred.

Discussion and conclusion

Single-/double-level ACDF affect local sagittal paramethers, correct kyphosis and modulates the cervicothoracic junction, but does not influence distal spinal or pelvic alignment. Pain relief and functional improvement are comparable in kyphotic and non-kyphotic patients, irrespective of relordotization magnitude. Patients may not require aggressive lordosis correction, based on their individual sagittal profiles. Nonetheless, these results and conclusions are limited to single-/double-level ACDFs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信