{"title":"水政策评估的计量经济学方法:以伊朗地下水表安装(GWMI)为例","authors":"Soorena Naderi , Ali Moridi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>The basins of Kor and Sivand Rivers, Iran.</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>More than two decades of groundwater depletion in Iran, prompted the Supreme Water Council (ISWC) approve the GWMI policy, aiming to reduce the groundwater withdrawal. Currently, although a decade has passed since the approval of the GWMI and significant financial resources have been invested in it, yet, no study has attempted to evaluate its effectiveness. To address this gap, this study evaluated the performance of the GWMI in reducing groundwater withdrawal using various propensity score-based econometric models.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological Insights for the Region</h3><div>Although all models showed acceptable fit and met their assumptions, results indicate that the GWMI —as one of Iran's most important water policies— has failed to achieve its primary goal of reducing groundwater withdrawal under all socioeconomic and water resources circumstances. This conclusion is based on the fact that the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT), used to assess GWMI’s effects, was not statistically significant in any model, despite indicating a decrease in well water withdrawal ranging from 763 m³ to 17,219 m³ in some areas. This study showed that this failure was mainly due to the mismatch between permitted volume of water extraction of wells and the dynamic storage of the aquifers, as well as as weaknesses in water pricing and low accuracy of meters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 102635"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An econometric approach toward water policy assessment: A case of groundwater meter installation (GWMI) in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Soorena Naderi , Ali Moridi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>The basins of Kor and Sivand Rivers, Iran.</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>More than two decades of groundwater depletion in Iran, prompted the Supreme Water Council (ISWC) approve the GWMI policy, aiming to reduce the groundwater withdrawal. Currently, although a decade has passed since the approval of the GWMI and significant financial resources have been invested in it, yet, no study has attempted to evaluate its effectiveness. To address this gap, this study evaluated the performance of the GWMI in reducing groundwater withdrawal using various propensity score-based econometric models.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological Insights for the Region</h3><div>Although all models showed acceptable fit and met their assumptions, results indicate that the GWMI —as one of Iran's most important water policies— has failed to achieve its primary goal of reducing groundwater withdrawal under all socioeconomic and water resources circumstances. This conclusion is based on the fact that the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT), used to assess GWMI’s effects, was not statistically significant in any model, despite indicating a decrease in well water withdrawal ranging from 763 m³ to 17,219 m³ in some areas. This study showed that this failure was mainly due to the mismatch between permitted volume of water extraction of wells and the dynamic storage of the aquifers, as well as as weaknesses in water pricing and low accuracy of meters.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825004604\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825004604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An econometric approach toward water policy assessment: A case of groundwater meter installation (GWMI) in Iran
Study region
The basins of Kor and Sivand Rivers, Iran.
Study focus
More than two decades of groundwater depletion in Iran, prompted the Supreme Water Council (ISWC) approve the GWMI policy, aiming to reduce the groundwater withdrawal. Currently, although a decade has passed since the approval of the GWMI and significant financial resources have been invested in it, yet, no study has attempted to evaluate its effectiveness. To address this gap, this study evaluated the performance of the GWMI in reducing groundwater withdrawal using various propensity score-based econometric models.
New Hydrological Insights for the Region
Although all models showed acceptable fit and met their assumptions, results indicate that the GWMI —as one of Iran's most important water policies— has failed to achieve its primary goal of reducing groundwater withdrawal under all socioeconomic and water resources circumstances. This conclusion is based on the fact that the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT), used to assess GWMI’s effects, was not statistically significant in any model, despite indicating a decrease in well water withdrawal ranging from 763 m³ to 17,219 m³ in some areas. This study showed that this failure was mainly due to the mismatch between permitted volume of water extraction of wells and the dynamic storage of the aquifers, as well as as weaknesses in water pricing and low accuracy of meters.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.