Minsub Oh , Hyunwook Lee , Seunguk Han , J. Ty Hopkins
{"title":"双侧和单侧慢性踝关节不稳定个体的姿势控制和肌肉激活的差异","authors":"Minsub Oh , Hyunwook Lee , Seunguk Han , J. Ty Hopkins","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.07.332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) exhibit deficits in postural control and muscle activation, with bilateral changes suggesting central alterations in sensorimotor function. However, differences in postural control and muscle activation between bilateral and unilateral CAI remain unclear. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing targeted rehabilitation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Do individuals with bilateral CAI, unilateral CAI, and healthy controls have differences in postural control and muscle activation?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>18 individuals with bilateral CAI (bilateral), 18 individuals with unilateral CAI (unilateral), and 18 healthy controls (control) were recruited. To assess center of pressure (COP) and integrated electromyography (iEMG), participants performed 3 trials of single-leg stance tasks and lower extremity muscle activation was recorded simultaneously. One-way ANOVA was used to assess differences in the self-reported functional outcomes, postural control, and muscle activation among the three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The bilateral group showed worse postural control in COP mediolateral velocity and COP anteroposterior velocity compared to the unilateral and control groups. However, the unilateral group showed similar postural control with the control group. The bilateral group showed greater iEMG in the tibialis anterior compared to the unilateral and control groups. The unilateral group showed lower iEMG in the tibialis anterior compared to the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Individuals with bilateral and unilateral CAI show significant differences in postural control and muscle activation during single-leg stance, suggesting that the central nervous system may process sensorimotor function differently. Understanding these differences can guide personalized treatments, which may enhance patient outcomes and reduce recurrent sprain risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"122 ","pages":"Pages 255-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in postural control and muscle activation in individuals with bilateral and unilateral chronic ankle instability\",\"authors\":\"Minsub Oh , Hyunwook Lee , Seunguk Han , J. Ty Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.07.332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) exhibit deficits in postural control and muscle activation, with bilateral changes suggesting central alterations in sensorimotor function. However, differences in postural control and muscle activation between bilateral and unilateral CAI remain unclear. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing targeted rehabilitation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Do individuals with bilateral CAI, unilateral CAI, and healthy controls have differences in postural control and muscle activation?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>18 individuals with bilateral CAI (bilateral), 18 individuals with unilateral CAI (unilateral), and 18 healthy controls (control) were recruited. To assess center of pressure (COP) and integrated electromyography (iEMG), participants performed 3 trials of single-leg stance tasks and lower extremity muscle activation was recorded simultaneously. One-way ANOVA was used to assess differences in the self-reported functional outcomes, postural control, and muscle activation among the three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The bilateral group showed worse postural control in COP mediolateral velocity and COP anteroposterior velocity compared to the unilateral and control groups. However, the unilateral group showed similar postural control with the control group. The bilateral group showed greater iEMG in the tibialis anterior compared to the unilateral and control groups. The unilateral group showed lower iEMG in the tibialis anterior compared to the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Individuals with bilateral and unilateral CAI show significant differences in postural control and muscle activation during single-leg stance, suggesting that the central nervous system may process sensorimotor function differently. Understanding these differences can guide personalized treatments, which may enhance patient outcomes and reduce recurrent sprain risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 255-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225005971\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225005971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in postural control and muscle activation in individuals with bilateral and unilateral chronic ankle instability
Background
Individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) exhibit deficits in postural control and muscle activation, with bilateral changes suggesting central alterations in sensorimotor function. However, differences in postural control and muscle activation between bilateral and unilateral CAI remain unclear. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing targeted rehabilitation strategies.
Research question
Do individuals with bilateral CAI, unilateral CAI, and healthy controls have differences in postural control and muscle activation?
Methods
18 individuals with bilateral CAI (bilateral), 18 individuals with unilateral CAI (unilateral), and 18 healthy controls (control) were recruited. To assess center of pressure (COP) and integrated electromyography (iEMG), participants performed 3 trials of single-leg stance tasks and lower extremity muscle activation was recorded simultaneously. One-way ANOVA was used to assess differences in the self-reported functional outcomes, postural control, and muscle activation among the three groups.
Results
The bilateral group showed worse postural control in COP mediolateral velocity and COP anteroposterior velocity compared to the unilateral and control groups. However, the unilateral group showed similar postural control with the control group. The bilateral group showed greater iEMG in the tibialis anterior compared to the unilateral and control groups. The unilateral group showed lower iEMG in the tibialis anterior compared to the control group.
Significance
Individuals with bilateral and unilateral CAI show significant differences in postural control and muscle activation during single-leg stance, suggesting that the central nervous system may process sensorimotor function differently. Understanding these differences can guide personalized treatments, which may enhance patient outcomes and reduce recurrent sprain risk.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.