William D. Leslie , Sajjad Aftabi , John T. Schousboe , Diane Krueger , Neil Binkley
{"title":"评估DXA扫描仪漂移对骨密度变化误分类的影响:马尼托巴骨密度登记","authors":"William D. Leslie , Sajjad Aftabi , John T. Schousboe , Diane Krueger , Neil Binkley","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2025.101620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used to assess osteoporosis and monitor BMD in untreated and treated individuals. Systematic sources of error can occur with DXA scanners, including calibration drift. Publications suggest a drift tolerance in the range 0.5 % to 1.5 %, but are not evidence- based. The current study was performed to directly determine how varying degrees of simulated DXA calibration drift would affect misclassification of BMD change in routine clinical practice. Using data from the Manitoba Bone Density Program, we accessed results for 14,942 individuals age 40 years and older undergoing baseline and repeat fan-beam DXA measurements of the total hip within an interval of 1-5 years. A small amount of simulated drift (absolute 0.003 g/cm<sup>2</sup> or relative 0.25 %) had little effect, and resulted in less than 5 % BMD change misclassification. Misclassification exceeded 10 % with absolute BMD drift greater than 0.006 g/cm<sup>2</sup> or relative drift over 0.75 %, and was greater than 35 % for absolute BMD drift of 0.024 g/cm<sup>2</sup>. Similar trends were seen when results were stratified according to use of anti-osteoporosis medication, when varying the least significant change (LSC), and for evaluating lumbar spine BMD change. In summary, relatively small degrees of DXA calibration drift can have large effects on misclassifying BMD change. Our results support a calibration drift tolerance of 0.006 g/cm<sup>2</sup> or 0.5 %. These findings may help to guide timing for DXA scanner servicing and repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"28 4","pages":"Article 101620"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effect of DXA scanner drift on misclassification of bone density change: The Manitoba BMD registry\",\"authors\":\"William D. Leslie , Sajjad Aftabi , John T. Schousboe , Diane Krueger , Neil Binkley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocd.2025.101620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used to assess osteoporosis and monitor BMD in untreated and treated individuals. Systematic sources of error can occur with DXA scanners, including calibration drift. Publications suggest a drift tolerance in the range 0.5 % to 1.5 %, but are not evidence- based. The current study was performed to directly determine how varying degrees of simulated DXA calibration drift would affect misclassification of BMD change in routine clinical practice. Using data from the Manitoba Bone Density Program, we accessed results for 14,942 individuals age 40 years and older undergoing baseline and repeat fan-beam DXA measurements of the total hip within an interval of 1-5 years. A small amount of simulated drift (absolute 0.003 g/cm<sup>2</sup> or relative 0.25 %) had little effect, and resulted in less than 5 % BMD change misclassification. Misclassification exceeded 10 % with absolute BMD drift greater than 0.006 g/cm<sup>2</sup> or relative drift over 0.75 %, and was greater than 35 % for absolute BMD drift of 0.024 g/cm<sup>2</sup>. Similar trends were seen when results were stratified according to use of anti-osteoporosis medication, when varying the least significant change (LSC), and for evaluating lumbar spine BMD change. In summary, relatively small degrees of DXA calibration drift can have large effects on misclassifying BMD change. Our results support a calibration drift tolerance of 0.006 g/cm<sup>2</sup> or 0.5 %. These findings may help to guide timing for DXA scanner servicing and repair.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695025000599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695025000599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the effect of DXA scanner drift on misclassification of bone density change: The Manitoba BMD registry
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used to assess osteoporosis and monitor BMD in untreated and treated individuals. Systematic sources of error can occur with DXA scanners, including calibration drift. Publications suggest a drift tolerance in the range 0.5 % to 1.5 %, but are not evidence- based. The current study was performed to directly determine how varying degrees of simulated DXA calibration drift would affect misclassification of BMD change in routine clinical practice. Using data from the Manitoba Bone Density Program, we accessed results for 14,942 individuals age 40 years and older undergoing baseline and repeat fan-beam DXA measurements of the total hip within an interval of 1-5 years. A small amount of simulated drift (absolute 0.003 g/cm2 or relative 0.25 %) had little effect, and resulted in less than 5 % BMD change misclassification. Misclassification exceeded 10 % with absolute BMD drift greater than 0.006 g/cm2 or relative drift over 0.75 %, and was greater than 35 % for absolute BMD drift of 0.024 g/cm2. Similar trends were seen when results were stratified according to use of anti-osteoporosis medication, when varying the least significant change (LSC), and for evaluating lumbar spine BMD change. In summary, relatively small degrees of DXA calibration drift can have large effects on misclassifying BMD change. Our results support a calibration drift tolerance of 0.006 g/cm2 or 0.5 %. These findings may help to guide timing for DXA scanner servicing and repair.
期刊介绍:
The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics.
Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.