{"title":"确定超高剂量率电子束下可能的非线性闪烁体响应的来源","authors":"Daline Tho , Sam Beddar","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2025.107494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/objective</h3><div>Previous studies of the Exradin-W2 (Standard Imaging, Middleton, WI, USA) organic scintillator under ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beams, have shown signs of saturation at high pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) and high doses per pulse (DPP). This study investigated the hypothesis that the saturation observed in the W2 is due to limitations of the electrometer rather than the scintillator itself.</div></div><div><h3>Material/methods</h3><div>We conducted a series of measurements to assess the performance of a 1 × 3 mm W2 detector and a 1 × 2 mm BCF-12 scintillator under 9 MeV electron beams. The experiment was carried out using a spectrometer capable of handling a wide range of signal intensities. The area under the curve was computed for each spectrum and used to compare across all measurements. To investigate the behavior of the detector to variations in PRF, we adjusted the PRF values from 10 Hz to 120 Hz. The linearity to integrated dose was validated by varying the number of pulses per acquisition. Additionally, we tested the linearity of the detector's response to DPP by changing the surface-to-source distance up to a DPP of 5.4 Gy. Finally, the W2 was connected to a long clear fiber extension and was used with the MAX SD electrometer under the same beam parameters as the previous measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The signal sensitivity variation for BCF-12 remained under 6 % for all pulse width (PW) values tested across all PRFs, whereas for the W2, the maximum decrease in signal sensitivity (3 %) was for a PW of 2 μs at 60 Hz. The linearity of the detector's response was maintained across all pulse numbers tested. Both detectors' responses remained linear with respect to both integrated dose and DPP. The W2 with the clear fiber extension showed a decrease in signal as the PRF increased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that the previously observed nonlinear effects are likely attributable to limitations of the electrometer, which was not designed for use with UHDR beams, rather than intrinsic properties of the W2 scintillator.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 107494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the origins of possible nonlinear scintillator response under ultra-high dose rate electron beams\",\"authors\":\"Daline Tho , Sam Beddar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmeas.2025.107494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose/objective</h3><div>Previous studies of the Exradin-W2 (Standard Imaging, Middleton, WI, USA) organic scintillator under ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beams, have shown signs of saturation at high pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) and high doses per pulse (DPP). This study investigated the hypothesis that the saturation observed in the W2 is due to limitations of the electrometer rather than the scintillator itself.</div></div><div><h3>Material/methods</h3><div>We conducted a series of measurements to assess the performance of a 1 × 3 mm W2 detector and a 1 × 2 mm BCF-12 scintillator under 9 MeV electron beams. The experiment was carried out using a spectrometer capable of handling a wide range of signal intensities. The area under the curve was computed for each spectrum and used to compare across all measurements. To investigate the behavior of the detector to variations in PRF, we adjusted the PRF values from 10 Hz to 120 Hz. The linearity to integrated dose was validated by varying the number of pulses per acquisition. Additionally, we tested the linearity of the detector's response to DPP by changing the surface-to-source distance up to a DPP of 5.4 Gy. Finally, the W2 was connected to a long clear fiber extension and was used with the MAX SD electrometer under the same beam parameters as the previous measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The signal sensitivity variation for BCF-12 remained under 6 % for all pulse width (PW) values tested across all PRFs, whereas for the W2, the maximum decrease in signal sensitivity (3 %) was for a PW of 2 μs at 60 Hz. The linearity of the detector's response was maintained across all pulse numbers tested. Both detectors' responses remained linear with respect to both integrated dose and DPP. The W2 with the clear fiber extension showed a decrease in signal as the PRF increased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that the previously observed nonlinear effects are likely attributable to limitations of the electrometer, which was not designed for use with UHDR beams, rather than intrinsic properties of the W2 scintillator.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448725001234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448725001234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying the origins of possible nonlinear scintillator response under ultra-high dose rate electron beams
Purpose/objective
Previous studies of the Exradin-W2 (Standard Imaging, Middleton, WI, USA) organic scintillator under ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beams, have shown signs of saturation at high pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) and high doses per pulse (DPP). This study investigated the hypothesis that the saturation observed in the W2 is due to limitations of the electrometer rather than the scintillator itself.
Material/methods
We conducted a series of measurements to assess the performance of a 1 × 3 mm W2 detector and a 1 × 2 mm BCF-12 scintillator under 9 MeV electron beams. The experiment was carried out using a spectrometer capable of handling a wide range of signal intensities. The area under the curve was computed for each spectrum and used to compare across all measurements. To investigate the behavior of the detector to variations in PRF, we adjusted the PRF values from 10 Hz to 120 Hz. The linearity to integrated dose was validated by varying the number of pulses per acquisition. Additionally, we tested the linearity of the detector's response to DPP by changing the surface-to-source distance up to a DPP of 5.4 Gy. Finally, the W2 was connected to a long clear fiber extension and was used with the MAX SD electrometer under the same beam parameters as the previous measurements.
Results
The signal sensitivity variation for BCF-12 remained under 6 % for all pulse width (PW) values tested across all PRFs, whereas for the W2, the maximum decrease in signal sensitivity (3 %) was for a PW of 2 μs at 60 Hz. The linearity of the detector's response was maintained across all pulse numbers tested. Both detectors' responses remained linear with respect to both integrated dose and DPP. The W2 with the clear fiber extension showed a decrease in signal as the PRF increased.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that the previously observed nonlinear effects are likely attributable to limitations of the electrometer, which was not designed for use with UHDR beams, rather than intrinsic properties of the W2 scintillator.
期刊介绍:
The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal.
Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.