基于计算工具的大学英语六级、雅思和托福阅读文章文本特征比较研究

IF 3.4 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lin Chen, Qingyun Luo
{"title":"基于计算工具的大学英语六级、雅思和托福阅读文章文本特征比较研究","authors":"Lin Chen,&nbsp;Qingyun Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study conducts a multidimensional analysis of reading texts from three major English proficiency tests--CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL--using computational tools such as Coh-Metrix, VocabProfile, and WordSmith. Based on a corpus of 60 reading passages from each test, the study evaluates text characteristics across five dimensions: vocabulary, syntax, textbase, situation model, and readability. The results reveal significant variations across multiple indices: (a) CET-6 texts demonstrate lower lexical and syntactic complexity but weaker cohesion at the textbase and situation model levels, while TOEFL passages exhibit the highest levels of lexical and syntactic sophistication; (b) IELTS texts occupy an intermediate position, with greater variability in text length; (c) no significant differences were observed across the three tests in terms of L2 Readability, suggesting that these exams may be more comparable in this aspect than previously assumed.</div><div>The findings highlight the interplay between text characteristics and cognitive demands, offering empirical insights for both test development and language education. This study underscores the necessity of adopting a multidimensional approach to assess text complexity, ultimately assisting learners in optimizing test preparation and language acquisition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101556"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of text characteristics of CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL reading passages based on computational tools\",\"authors\":\"Lin Chen,&nbsp;Qingyun Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study conducts a multidimensional analysis of reading texts from three major English proficiency tests--CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL--using computational tools such as Coh-Metrix, VocabProfile, and WordSmith. Based on a corpus of 60 reading passages from each test, the study evaluates text characteristics across five dimensions: vocabulary, syntax, textbase, situation model, and readability. The results reveal significant variations across multiple indices: (a) CET-6 texts demonstrate lower lexical and syntactic complexity but weaker cohesion at the textbase and situation model levels, while TOEFL passages exhibit the highest levels of lexical and syntactic sophistication; (b) IELTS texts occupy an intermediate position, with greater variability in text length; (c) no significant differences were observed across the three tests in terms of L2 Readability, suggesting that these exams may be more comparable in this aspect than previously assumed.</div><div>The findings highlight the interplay between text characteristics and cognitive demands, offering empirical insights for both test development and language education. This study underscores the necessity of adopting a multidimensional approach to assess text complexity, ultimately assisting learners in optimizing test preparation and language acquisition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用Coh-Metrix、VocabProfile和WordSmith等计算工具,对三种主要英语水平考试——CET-6、IELTS和TOEFL的阅读文本进行了多维度分析。基于每个测试的60篇阅读文章的语料库,该研究从五个方面评估文本特征:词汇、语法、文本库、情境模型和可读性。结果显示,在多个指标上存在显著差异:(a)在文本库和情景模型层面,CET-6文本的词汇和句法复杂性较低,衔接能力较弱,而TOEFL文本的词汇和句法复杂性最高;(b)雅思文本处于中间位置,文本长度变化较大;(c)在二语可读性方面,三个测试没有观察到显著差异,这表明这些测试在这方面可能比之前假设的更具可比性。研究结果强调了文本特征与认知需求之间的相互作用,为测试开发和语言教育提供了经验见解。本研究强调了采用多维方法评估文本复杂性的必要性,最终帮助学习者优化考试准备和语言习得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of text characteristics of CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL reading passages based on computational tools
This study conducts a multidimensional analysis of reading texts from three major English proficiency tests--CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL--using computational tools such as Coh-Metrix, VocabProfile, and WordSmith. Based on a corpus of 60 reading passages from each test, the study evaluates text characteristics across five dimensions: vocabulary, syntax, textbase, situation model, and readability. The results reveal significant variations across multiple indices: (a) CET-6 texts demonstrate lower lexical and syntactic complexity but weaker cohesion at the textbase and situation model levels, while TOEFL passages exhibit the highest levels of lexical and syntactic sophistication; (b) IELTS texts occupy an intermediate position, with greater variability in text length; (c) no significant differences were observed across the three tests in terms of L2 Readability, suggesting that these exams may be more comparable in this aspect than previously assumed.
The findings highlight the interplay between text characteristics and cognitive demands, offering empirical insights for both test development and language education. This study underscores the necessity of adopting a multidimensional approach to assess text complexity, ultimately assisting learners in optimizing test preparation and language acquisition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信