{"title":"基于计算工具的大学英语六级、雅思和托福阅读文章文本特征比较研究","authors":"Lin Chen, Qingyun Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study conducts a multidimensional analysis of reading texts from three major English proficiency tests--CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL--using computational tools such as Coh-Metrix, VocabProfile, and WordSmith. Based on a corpus of 60 reading passages from each test, the study evaluates text characteristics across five dimensions: vocabulary, syntax, textbase, situation model, and readability. The results reveal significant variations across multiple indices: (a) CET-6 texts demonstrate lower lexical and syntactic complexity but weaker cohesion at the textbase and situation model levels, while TOEFL passages exhibit the highest levels of lexical and syntactic sophistication; (b) IELTS texts occupy an intermediate position, with greater variability in text length; (c) no significant differences were observed across the three tests in terms of L2 Readability, suggesting that these exams may be more comparable in this aspect than previously assumed.</div><div>The findings highlight the interplay between text characteristics and cognitive demands, offering empirical insights for both test development and language education. This study underscores the necessity of adopting a multidimensional approach to assess text complexity, ultimately assisting learners in optimizing test preparation and language acquisition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101556"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of text characteristics of CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL reading passages based on computational tools\",\"authors\":\"Lin Chen, Qingyun Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study conducts a multidimensional analysis of reading texts from three major English proficiency tests--CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL--using computational tools such as Coh-Metrix, VocabProfile, and WordSmith. Based on a corpus of 60 reading passages from each test, the study evaluates text characteristics across five dimensions: vocabulary, syntax, textbase, situation model, and readability. The results reveal significant variations across multiple indices: (a) CET-6 texts demonstrate lower lexical and syntactic complexity but weaker cohesion at the textbase and situation model levels, while TOEFL passages exhibit the highest levels of lexical and syntactic sophistication; (b) IELTS texts occupy an intermediate position, with greater variability in text length; (c) no significant differences were observed across the three tests in terms of L2 Readability, suggesting that these exams may be more comparable in this aspect than previously assumed.</div><div>The findings highlight the interplay between text characteristics and cognitive demands, offering empirical insights for both test development and language education. This study underscores the necessity of adopting a multidimensional approach to assess text complexity, ultimately assisting learners in optimizing test preparation and language acquisition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of text characteristics of CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL reading passages based on computational tools
This study conducts a multidimensional analysis of reading texts from three major English proficiency tests--CET-6, IELTS, and TOEFL--using computational tools such as Coh-Metrix, VocabProfile, and WordSmith. Based on a corpus of 60 reading passages from each test, the study evaluates text characteristics across five dimensions: vocabulary, syntax, textbase, situation model, and readability. The results reveal significant variations across multiple indices: (a) CET-6 texts demonstrate lower lexical and syntactic complexity but weaker cohesion at the textbase and situation model levels, while TOEFL passages exhibit the highest levels of lexical and syntactic sophistication; (b) IELTS texts occupy an intermediate position, with greater variability in text length; (c) no significant differences were observed across the three tests in terms of L2 Readability, suggesting that these exams may be more comparable in this aspect than previously assumed.
The findings highlight the interplay between text characteristics and cognitive demands, offering empirical insights for both test development and language education. This study underscores the necessity of adopting a multidimensional approach to assess text complexity, ultimately assisting learners in optimizing test preparation and language acquisition.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.