印度尼西亚东部初级保健利用方面的社会经济差异

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ratna Dwi Wulandari , Agung Dwi Laksono , Zuardin Zuardin , Nikmatur Rohmah , Maznah Dahlui
{"title":"印度尼西亚东部初级保健利用方面的社会经济差异","authors":"Ratna Dwi Wulandari ,&nbsp;Agung Dwi Laksono ,&nbsp;Zuardin Zuardin ,&nbsp;Nikmatur Rohmah ,&nbsp;Maznah Dahlui","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Indonesia's eastern region is lagging in development, including the health sector, compared to other areas. The study aims to analyze socioeconomic disparities in primary healthcare utilization in eastern Indonesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study analyzed raw data from the 2018 Indonesian Basic Health Survey. The poll collected 57,827 respondents using stratification and multistage random selection. Meanwhile, the research employed primary healthcare utilization as an outcome variable and socioeconomic status as an exposure variable. Moreover, the study controlled for nine variables: region, type of residence, age, gender, marital status, education level, work type, health insurance ownership, and time spent traveling to primary healthcare. In the final part of the analysis, the study employed binary logistic regression to examine the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results show that the poorer were 0.910 times less likely than the poorest to utilize primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.904–0.916). Individuals from a middle socioeconomic status were 0.877 times less likely than those from the poorest group to use primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.871–0.883). The richer were 0.821 times less likely than the most impoverished to utilize primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.815–0.828). The richest were 0.808 times less likely than the poorest to use primary healthcare (95 % 0.801–0.815).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Socioeconomic disparities existed in primary healthcare utilization in eastern Indonesia. For those living in poverty, this condition poses no financial obstacle to receiving primary healthcare services. This circumstance serves as an example of how well National Health Insurance policies, combined with Contribution Assistance for Recipients, work for low-income individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 102154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic disparities in primary healthcare utilization in Eastern Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Ratna Dwi Wulandari ,&nbsp;Agung Dwi Laksono ,&nbsp;Zuardin Zuardin ,&nbsp;Nikmatur Rohmah ,&nbsp;Maznah Dahlui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Indonesia's eastern region is lagging in development, including the health sector, compared to other areas. The study aims to analyze socioeconomic disparities in primary healthcare utilization in eastern Indonesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study analyzed raw data from the 2018 Indonesian Basic Health Survey. The poll collected 57,827 respondents using stratification and multistage random selection. Meanwhile, the research employed primary healthcare utilization as an outcome variable and socioeconomic status as an exposure variable. Moreover, the study controlled for nine variables: region, type of residence, age, gender, marital status, education level, work type, health insurance ownership, and time spent traveling to primary healthcare. In the final part of the analysis, the study employed binary logistic regression to examine the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results show that the poorer were 0.910 times less likely than the poorest to utilize primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.904–0.916). Individuals from a middle socioeconomic status were 0.877 times less likely than those from the poorest group to use primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.871–0.883). The richer were 0.821 times less likely than the most impoverished to utilize primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.815–0.828). The richest were 0.808 times less likely than the poorest to use primary healthcare (95 % 0.801–0.815).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Socioeconomic disparities existed in primary healthcare utilization in eastern Indonesia. For those living in poverty, this condition poses no financial obstacle to receiving primary healthcare services. This circumstance serves as an example of how well National Health Insurance policies, combined with Contribution Assistance for Recipients, work for low-income individuals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他地区相比,印度尼西亚东部地区的发展滞后,包括卫生部门。本研究旨在分析印尼东部初级卫生保健利用的社会经济差异。方法分析2018年印度尼西亚基本健康调查的原始数据。本次调查采用分层和多阶段随机抽样的方法,共收集了57827名受访者。同时,本研究以初级卫生保健利用为结果变量,以社会经济地位为暴露变量。此外,该研究还控制了9个变量:地区、居住类型、年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度、工作类型、医疗保险所有权和前往初级医疗机构的时间。在分析的最后部分,研究采用二元逻辑回归对数据进行检验。结果贫困者利用初级卫生保健的可能性是贫困者的0.910倍(95% CI 0.904 ~ 0.916)。中等社会经济地位的个体使用初级卫生保健的可能性是最贫困群体的0.877倍(95% CI 0.871-0.883)。富人利用初级卫生保健的可能性是最贫困人口的0.821倍(95%可信区间0.815-0.828)。最富有人群使用初级卫生保健的可能性是最贫穷人群的0.808倍(95% 0.801-0.815)。结论印尼东部地区初级卫生保健利用存在社会经济差异。对于那些生活贫困的人来说,这种情况对获得初级保健服务不构成经济障碍。这种情况可以作为一个例子,说明国民健康保险政策结合对受助人的缴款援助如何有效地为低收入个人服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioeconomic disparities in primary healthcare utilization in Eastern Indonesia

Objectives

Indonesia's eastern region is lagging in development, including the health sector, compared to other areas. The study aims to analyze socioeconomic disparities in primary healthcare utilization in eastern Indonesia.

Methods

The study analyzed raw data from the 2018 Indonesian Basic Health Survey. The poll collected 57,827 respondents using stratification and multistage random selection. Meanwhile, the research employed primary healthcare utilization as an outcome variable and socioeconomic status as an exposure variable. Moreover, the study controlled for nine variables: region, type of residence, age, gender, marital status, education level, work type, health insurance ownership, and time spent traveling to primary healthcare. In the final part of the analysis, the study employed binary logistic regression to examine the data.

Results

The results show that the poorer were 0.910 times less likely than the poorest to utilize primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.904–0.916). Individuals from a middle socioeconomic status were 0.877 times less likely than those from the poorest group to use primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.871–0.883). The richer were 0.821 times less likely than the most impoverished to utilize primary healthcare (95 % CI 0.815–0.828). The richest were 0.808 times less likely than the poorest to use primary healthcare (95 % 0.801–0.815).

Conclusions

Socioeconomic disparities existed in primary healthcare utilization in eastern Indonesia. For those living in poverty, this condition poses no financial obstacle to receiving primary healthcare services. This circumstance serves as an example of how well National Health Insurance policies, combined with Contribution Assistance for Recipients, work for low-income individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信